Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
- Autores
- Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research.
Fil: Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina
Fil: Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia; Argentina - Materia
-
ETHICS
ECHINODERMATA
3RS PRINCIPLE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55493
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_910c3b581db3db7a868e382414a76327 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55493 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia TamaraCrespi Abril, Augusto CesarETHICSECHINODERMATA3RS PRINCIPLEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research.Fil: Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; ArgentinaFil: Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia; ArgentinaRevista de Biología Tropical2017-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/55493Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar; Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?; Revista de Biología Tropical; Revista de Biología Tropical; 65; 11-2017; 11-220034-7744CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/31662info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:07:08Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55493instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:07:08.979CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? |
title |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? |
spellingShingle |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara ETHICS ECHINODERMATA 3RS PRINCIPLE |
title_short |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? |
title_full |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? |
title_fullStr |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? |
title_sort |
Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar |
author |
Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara |
author_facet |
Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ETHICS ECHINODERMATA 3RS PRINCIPLE |
topic |
ETHICS ECHINODERMATA 3RS PRINCIPLE |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research. Fil: Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina Fil: Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia; Argentina |
description |
Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/55493 Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar; Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?; Revista de Biología Tropical; Revista de Biología Tropical; 65; 11-2017; 11-22 0034-7744 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/55493 |
identifier_str_mv |
Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar; Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?; Revista de Biología Tropical; Revista de Biología Tropical; 65; 11-2017; 11-22 0034-7744 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/31662 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Biología Tropical |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Biología Tropical |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613928209874944 |
score |
13.070432 |