Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?

Autores
Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research.
Fil: Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina
Fil: Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia; Argentina
Materia
ETHICS
ECHINODERMATA
3RS PRINCIPLE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55493

id CONICETDig_910c3b581db3db7a868e382414a76327
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55493
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia TamaraCrespi Abril, Augusto CesarETHICSECHINODERMATA3RS PRINCIPLEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research.Fil: Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; ArgentinaFil: Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia; ArgentinaRevista de Biología Tropical2017-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/55493Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar; Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?; Revista de Biología Tropical; Revista de Biología Tropical; 65; 11-2017; 11-220034-7744CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/31662info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:07:08Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/55493instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:07:08.979CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
title Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
spellingShingle Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara
ETHICS
ECHINODERMATA
3RS PRINCIPLE
title_short Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
title_full Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
title_fullStr Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
title_full_unstemmed Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
title_sort Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara
Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar
author Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara
author_facet Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara
Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar
author_role author
author2 Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ETHICS
ECHINODERMATA
3RS PRINCIPLE
topic ETHICS
ECHINODERMATA
3RS PRINCIPLE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research.
Fil: Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina
Fil: Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia; Argentina
description Traditional ethics reflection centers the discussion in conflicts that affect humans. According toepistemology-based ethics, facts are needed to include other living beings as object of ethical consideration. Inthis sense, huge efforts have been made to demonstrate that animal suffering is real. However, the ethical reflectiononly reaches large vertebrates and some species of small ones, excluding invertebrates. However, a differentapproach (ethic-based epistemology) is equally valid and questions the assumptions of traditional ethics. Thisnew insight does not demand facts to demonstrate that living beings should be considered ethically, since ethicsshould be first than epistemology (facts). Thus, all living beings should be treated with respect and a relationshipbased on empathy should be established. In this context, we discuss all the advances made in echinodermresearch in the last 3000 years and the different uses humans made of these organisms. Finally we emphasizethat, when studying echinoderms, a reflection about our behavior as researchers is necessary, and we encouragethe use of ethically responsible research.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/55493
Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar; Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?; Revista de Biología Tropical; Revista de Biología Tropical; 65; 11-2017; 11-22
0034-7744
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/55493
identifier_str_mv Rubilar Panasiuk, Cynthia Tamara; Crespi Abril, Augusto Cesar; Does Echinoderm research deserve an ethical consideration?; Revista de Biología Tropical; Revista de Biología Tropical; 65; 11-2017; 11-22
0034-7744
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rbt/article/view/31662
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Biología Tropical
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Biología Tropical
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613928209874944
score 13.070432