A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis

Autores
Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome.
Fil: Fornoni, Juan. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Ordano, Mariano Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Miguel Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Boege, Karina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Domínguez, César A.. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Materia
Floral Evolution
Intra-Floral Integration
Phenotypic Integration
Plant Mating System
Selfing Syndrome
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56330

id CONICETDig_8fcbc42831e4f8190ba03301b9dccacc
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56330
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysisFornoni, JuanOrdano, Mariano AndrésPérez Ishiwara, RubénBoege, KarinaDomínguez, César A.Floral EvolutionIntra-Floral IntegrationPhenotypic IntegrationPlant Mating SystemSelfing Syndromehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome.Fil: Fornoni, Juan. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Ordano, Mariano Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Miguel Lillo; ArgentinaFil: Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Boege, Karina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Domínguez, César A.. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoOxford University Press2016-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/56330Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.; A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis; Oxford University Press; Annals of Botany; 117; 2; 2-2016; 299-3060305-7364CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/aob/mcv166info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/117/2/299/2195683info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:37:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56330instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:37:31.093CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
title A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
spellingShingle A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
Fornoni, Juan
Floral Evolution
Intra-Floral Integration
Phenotypic Integration
Plant Mating System
Selfing Syndrome
title_short A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
title_sort A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fornoni, Juan
Ordano, Mariano Andrés
Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén
Boege, Karina
Domínguez, César A.
author Fornoni, Juan
author_facet Fornoni, Juan
Ordano, Mariano Andrés
Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén
Boege, Karina
Domínguez, César A.
author_role author
author2 Ordano, Mariano Andrés
Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén
Boege, Karina
Domínguez, César A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Floral Evolution
Intra-Floral Integration
Phenotypic Integration
Plant Mating System
Selfing Syndrome
topic Floral Evolution
Intra-Floral Integration
Phenotypic Integration
Plant Mating System
Selfing Syndrome
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome.
Fil: Fornoni, Juan. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Ordano, Mariano Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Miguel Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Boege, Karina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Domínguez, César A.. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
description Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56330
Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.; A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis; Oxford University Press; Annals of Botany; 117; 2; 2-2016; 299-306
0305-7364
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56330
identifier_str_mv Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.; A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis; Oxford University Press; Annals of Botany; 117; 2; 2-2016; 299-306
0305-7364
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/aob/mcv166
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/117/2/299/2195683
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082848332709888
score 13.22299