A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis
- Autores
- Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome.
Fil: Fornoni, Juan. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Ordano, Mariano Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Miguel Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Boege, Karina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México
Fil: Domínguez, César A.. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México - Materia
-
Floral Evolution
Intra-Floral Integration
Phenotypic Integration
Plant Mating System
Selfing Syndrome - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56330
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_8fcbc42831e4f8190ba03301b9dccacc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56330 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysisFornoni, JuanOrdano, Mariano AndrésPérez Ishiwara, RubénBoege, KarinaDomínguez, César A.Floral EvolutionIntra-Floral IntegrationPhenotypic IntegrationPlant Mating SystemSelfing Syndromehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome.Fil: Fornoni, Juan. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Ordano, Mariano Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Miguel Lillo; ArgentinaFil: Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Boege, Karina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoFil: Domínguez, César A.. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; MéxicoOxford University Press2016-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/56330Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.; A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis; Oxford University Press; Annals of Botany; 117; 2; 2-2016; 299-3060305-7364CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/aob/mcv166info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/117/2/299/2195683info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:37:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/56330instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:37:31.093CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis |
title |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis Fornoni, Juan Floral Evolution Intra-Floral Integration Phenotypic Integration Plant Mating System Selfing Syndrome |
title_short |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis |
title_full |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis |
title_sort |
A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Fornoni, Juan Ordano, Mariano Andrés Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén Boege, Karina Domínguez, César A. |
author |
Fornoni, Juan |
author_facet |
Fornoni, Juan Ordano, Mariano Andrés Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén Boege, Karina Domínguez, César A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ordano, Mariano Andrés Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén Boege, Karina Domínguez, César A. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Floral Evolution Intra-Floral Integration Phenotypic Integration Plant Mating System Selfing Syndrome |
topic |
Floral Evolution Intra-Floral Integration Phenotypic Integration Plant Mating System Selfing Syndrome |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome. Fil: Fornoni, Juan. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México Fil: Ordano, Mariano Andrés. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación Miguel Lillo; Argentina Fil: Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México Fil: Boege, Karina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México Fil: Domínguez, César A.. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; México |
description |
Background and Aims Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system. Methods A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). Key Results The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories. Conclusions The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56330 Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.; A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis; Oxford University Press; Annals of Botany; 117; 2; 2-2016; 299-306 0305-7364 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/56330 |
identifier_str_mv |
Fornoni, Juan; Ordano, Mariano Andrés; Pérez Ishiwara, Rubén; Boege, Karina; Domínguez, César A.; A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: A meta-analysis; Oxford University Press; Annals of Botany; 117; 2; 2-2016; 299-306 0305-7364 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/aob/mcv166 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/117/2/299/2195683 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846082848332709888 |
score |
13.22299 |