Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters
- Autores
- Pauchard, Aníbal; Meyerson, Laura A.; Bacher, Sven; Blackburn, Tim M.; Brundu, Giuseppe; Cadotte, Marc W.; Courchamp, Franck; Essl, Franz; Genovesi, Piero; Haider, Sylvia; Holmes, Nick D.; Hulme, Philip E.; Jeschke, Jonathan M.; Lockwood, Julie L.; Novoa, Ana; Nuñez, Martin Andres; Peltzer, Duane A.; Pyšek, Petr; Richardson, David M.; Simberloff, Daniel; Smith, Kevin; van Wilgen, Brian W.; Vilà, Montserrat; Wilson, John R; Winter, Marten; Zenni, Rafael D.
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following.
Fil: Pauchard, Aníbal. Universidad de Concepción; Chile
Fil: Meyerson, Laura A.. University of Rhode Island; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bacher, Sven. University of Fribourg; Suiza
Fil: Blackburn, Tim M.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. The Zoological Society of London; Reino Unido
Fil: Brundu, Giuseppe. University of Sassari; Italia
Fil: Cadotte, Marc W.. University of Toronto; Canadá
Fil: Courchamp, Franck. Université Paris Sud; Francia
Fil: Essl, Franz. Universidad de Viena; Austria
Fil: Genovesi, Piero. Institute for Environmental Protection and Research and Chair IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group; Italia
Fil: Haider, Sylvia. Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden; Alemania
Fil: Holmes, Nick D.. Island Conservation; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hulme, Philip E.. Lincoln University; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Jeschke, Jonathan M.. Leibniz - Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries; Alemania. Freie Universität Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Lockwood, Julie L.. Rutgers University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Novoa, Ana. Czech Academy of Sciences; República Checa
Fil: Nuñez, Martin Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Peltzer, Duane A.. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Pysek, Petr. Charles University; República Checa
Fil: Richardson, David M.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica
Fil: Simberloff, Daniel. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos
Fil: Smith, Kevin. International Union for Conservation of Nature; Reino Unido
Fil: van Wilgen, Brian W.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica
Fil: Vilà, Montserrat. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Estación Biológica de Doñana; España
Fil: Wilson, John R. U.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica
Fil: Winter, Marten. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; Alemania
Fil: Zenni, Rafael D.. University of Lavras; Brasil - Materia
-
BIODIVERSITY INDEX
NON-NATIVE SPECIES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/93421
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_8fc58fc81acbe3fd18df89183bddd6e7 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/93421 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin mattersPauchard, AníbalMeyerson, Laura A.Bacher, SvenBlackburn, Tim M.Brundu, GiuseppeCadotte, Marc W.Courchamp, FranckEssl, FranzGenovesi, PieroHaider, SylviaHolmes, Nick D.Hulme, Philip E.Jeschke, Jonathan M.Lockwood, Julie L.Novoa, AnaNuñez, Martin AndresPeltzer, Duane A.Pyšek, PetrRichardson, David M.Simberloff, DanielSmith, Kevinvan Wilgen, Brian W.Vilà, MontserratWilson, John RWinter, MartenZenni, Rafael D.BIODIVERSITY INDEXNON-NATIVE SPECIEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following.Fil: Pauchard, Aníbal. Universidad de Concepción; ChileFil: Meyerson, Laura A.. University of Rhode Island; Estados UnidosFil: Bacher, Sven. University of Fribourg; SuizaFil: Blackburn, Tim M.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. The Zoological Society of London; Reino UnidoFil: Brundu, Giuseppe. University of Sassari; ItaliaFil: Cadotte, Marc W.. University of Toronto; CanadáFil: Courchamp, Franck. Université Paris Sud; FranciaFil: Essl, Franz. Universidad de Viena; AustriaFil: Genovesi, Piero. Institute for Environmental Protection and Research and Chair IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group; ItaliaFil: Haider, Sylvia. Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden; AlemaniaFil: Holmes, Nick D.. Island Conservation; Estados UnidosFil: Hulme, Philip E.. Lincoln University; Nueva ZelandaFil: Jeschke, Jonathan M.. Leibniz - Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries; Alemania. Freie Universität Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Lockwood, Julie L.. Rutgers University; Estados UnidosFil: Novoa, Ana. Czech Academy of Sciences; República ChecaFil: Nuñez, Martin Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Peltzer, Duane A.. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva ZelandaFil: Pysek, Petr. Charles University; República ChecaFil: Richardson, David M.. Stellenbosch University; SudáfricaFil: Simberloff, Daniel. University of Tennessee; Estados UnidosFil: Smith, Kevin. International Union for Conservation of Nature; Reino UnidoFil: van Wilgen, Brian W.. Stellenbosch University; SudáfricaFil: Vilà, Montserrat. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Estación Biológica de Doñana; EspañaFil: Wilson, John R. U.. Stellenbosch University; SudáfricaFil: Winter, Marten. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; AlemaniaFil: Zenni, Rafael D.. University of Lavras; BrasilPublic Library of Science2018-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/93421Pauchard, Aníbal; Meyerson, Laura A.; Bacher, Sven; Blackburn, Tim M.; Brundu, Giuseppe; et al.; Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters; Public Library of Science; PLoS Biology; 16; 11; 11-2018; 1-41544-9173CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:41:51Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/93421instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:41:52.085CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters |
| title |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters |
| spellingShingle |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters Pauchard, Aníbal BIODIVERSITY INDEX NON-NATIVE SPECIES |
| title_short |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters |
| title_full |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters |
| title_fullStr |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters |
| title_sort |
Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pauchard, Aníbal Meyerson, Laura A. Bacher, Sven Blackburn, Tim M. Brundu, Giuseppe Cadotte, Marc W. Courchamp, Franck Essl, Franz Genovesi, Piero Haider, Sylvia Holmes, Nick D. Hulme, Philip E. Jeschke, Jonathan M. Lockwood, Julie L. Novoa, Ana Nuñez, Martin Andres Peltzer, Duane A. Pyšek, Petr Richardson, David M. Simberloff, Daniel Smith, Kevin van Wilgen, Brian W. Vilà, Montserrat Wilson, John R Winter, Marten Zenni, Rafael D. |
| author |
Pauchard, Aníbal |
| author_facet |
Pauchard, Aníbal Meyerson, Laura A. Bacher, Sven Blackburn, Tim M. Brundu, Giuseppe Cadotte, Marc W. Courchamp, Franck Essl, Franz Genovesi, Piero Haider, Sylvia Holmes, Nick D. Hulme, Philip E. Jeschke, Jonathan M. Lockwood, Julie L. Novoa, Ana Nuñez, Martin Andres Peltzer, Duane A. Pyšek, Petr Richardson, David M. Simberloff, Daniel Smith, Kevin van Wilgen, Brian W. Vilà, Montserrat Wilson, John R Winter, Marten Zenni, Rafael D. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Meyerson, Laura A. Bacher, Sven Blackburn, Tim M. Brundu, Giuseppe Cadotte, Marc W. Courchamp, Franck Essl, Franz Genovesi, Piero Haider, Sylvia Holmes, Nick D. Hulme, Philip E. Jeschke, Jonathan M. Lockwood, Julie L. Novoa, Ana Nuñez, Martin Andres Peltzer, Duane A. Pyšek, Petr Richardson, David M. Simberloff, Daniel Smith, Kevin van Wilgen, Brian W. Vilà, Montserrat Wilson, John R Winter, Marten Zenni, Rafael D. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BIODIVERSITY INDEX NON-NATIVE SPECIES |
| topic |
BIODIVERSITY INDEX NON-NATIVE SPECIES |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following. Fil: Pauchard, Aníbal. Universidad de Concepción; Chile Fil: Meyerson, Laura A.. University of Rhode Island; Estados Unidos Fil: Bacher, Sven. University of Fribourg; Suiza Fil: Blackburn, Tim M.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido. The Zoological Society of London; Reino Unido Fil: Brundu, Giuseppe. University of Sassari; Italia Fil: Cadotte, Marc W.. University of Toronto; Canadá Fil: Courchamp, Franck. Université Paris Sud; Francia Fil: Essl, Franz. Universidad de Viena; Austria Fil: Genovesi, Piero. Institute for Environmental Protection and Research and Chair IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group; Italia Fil: Haider, Sylvia. Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden; Alemania Fil: Holmes, Nick D.. Island Conservation; Estados Unidos Fil: Hulme, Philip E.. Lincoln University; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Jeschke, Jonathan M.. Leibniz - Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries; Alemania. Freie Universität Berlin; Alemania Fil: Lockwood, Julie L.. Rutgers University; Estados Unidos Fil: Novoa, Ana. Czech Academy of Sciences; República Checa Fil: Nuñez, Martin Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina Fil: Peltzer, Duane A.. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Research; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Pysek, Petr. Charles University; República Checa Fil: Richardson, David M.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica Fil: Simberloff, Daniel. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos Fil: Smith, Kevin. International Union for Conservation of Nature; Reino Unido Fil: van Wilgen, Brian W.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica Fil: Vilà, Montserrat. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Estación Biológica de Doñana; España Fil: Wilson, John R. U.. Stellenbosch University; Sudáfrica Fil: Winter, Marten. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research; Alemania Fil: Zenni, Rafael D.. University of Lavras; Brasil |
| description |
Recent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/93421 Pauchard, Aníbal; Meyerson, Laura A.; Bacher, Sven; Blackburn, Tim M.; Brundu, Giuseppe; et al.; Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters; Public Library of Science; PLoS Biology; 16; 11; 11-2018; 1-4 1544-9173 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/93421 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Pauchard, Aníbal; Meyerson, Laura A.; Bacher, Sven; Blackburn, Tim M.; Brundu, Giuseppe; et al.; Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters; Public Library of Science; PLoS Biology; 16; 11; 11-2018; 1-4 1544-9173 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library of Science |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Public Library of Science |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1844613321009922048 |
| score |
13.070432 |