Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions
- Autores
- Roselli, Nestor Daniel
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The main aim of this research is to recognize and differentiate several kinds or modalities of elaboration of a cognitive product in pairs, in this case, the elaboration of conceptual maps. These modalities come from a comparative analysis between individual and collective productions. This comparison is not concerned only with the quality of the productions, but also with qualitative differences that could show processes of social influence. In this case, it is interesting to analyze the different modalities of social interaction and of reaching consensus. After a master lecture of a professor, 24 university students were requested to individually produce a conceptual map of the topic. The students were able to consult their notes. Finally, in pairs, they were asked to collaboratively develop a single conceptual map, consulting their respective individual conceptual maps, but not their notes, which were taken away. The analysis is based on a comparison, inside each pair, between the individual and the collective conceptual maps. This analysis includes both cognitive (content) and formal (graph) aspects. Two dimensions were considered: homogeneity-heterogeneity and symmetry-asymmetry of individual contributions. The crossing between these dimensions allowed to differentiate the modalities of the collective construction. Finally, the article analyses the relation between cognitive and formal aspects, which are not always in accordance. The most general conclusion is that, concerning the social construction of conceptual maps, the cognitive contribution of each subject/student to the collective production must be differentiated from the instrumental operation of drawing the map.
Fil: Roselli, Nestor Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Psicología y Psicopedagogía. Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología y Psicopedagogía; Argentina - Materia
-
collaborative learning
shared cognition
sociocognitive construction
Peer interaction
group learning - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75489
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_8eca35aadc4a232acd3d0a7c4a396929 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75489 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective ProductionsRoselli, Nestor Danielcollaborative learningshared cognitionsociocognitive constructionPeer interactiongroup learninghttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The main aim of this research is to recognize and differentiate several kinds or modalities of elaboration of a cognitive product in pairs, in this case, the elaboration of conceptual maps. These modalities come from a comparative analysis between individual and collective productions. This comparison is not concerned only with the quality of the productions, but also with qualitative differences that could show processes of social influence. In this case, it is interesting to analyze the different modalities of social interaction and of reaching consensus. After a master lecture of a professor, 24 university students were requested to individually produce a conceptual map of the topic. The students were able to consult their notes. Finally, in pairs, they were asked to collaboratively develop a single conceptual map, consulting their respective individual conceptual maps, but not their notes, which were taken away. The analysis is based on a comparison, inside each pair, between the individual and the collective conceptual maps. This analysis includes both cognitive (content) and formal (graph) aspects. Two dimensions were considered: homogeneity-heterogeneity and symmetry-asymmetry of individual contributions. The crossing between these dimensions allowed to differentiate the modalities of the collective construction. Finally, the article analyses the relation between cognitive and formal aspects, which are not always in accordance. The most general conclusion is that, concerning the social construction of conceptual maps, the cognitive contribution of each subject/student to the collective production must be differentiated from the instrumental operation of drawing the map.Fil: Roselli, Nestor Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Psicología y Psicopedagogía. Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología y Psicopedagogía; ArgentinaScience and Education2017-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/75489Roselli, Nestor Daniel; Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions; Science and Education; American Journal of Educational Research; 5; 10; 11-2017; 1058-10642327-61261058-1064CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/5/10/7/index.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12691/education-5-10-7info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-17T10:47:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/75489instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-17 10:47:32.348CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions |
title |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions |
spellingShingle |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions Roselli, Nestor Daniel collaborative learning shared cognition sociocognitive construction Peer interaction group learning |
title_short |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions |
title_full |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions |
title_fullStr |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions |
title_sort |
Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Roselli, Nestor Daniel |
author |
Roselli, Nestor Daniel |
author_facet |
Roselli, Nestor Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
collaborative learning shared cognition sociocognitive construction Peer interaction group learning |
topic |
collaborative learning shared cognition sociocognitive construction Peer interaction group learning |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The main aim of this research is to recognize and differentiate several kinds or modalities of elaboration of a cognitive product in pairs, in this case, the elaboration of conceptual maps. These modalities come from a comparative analysis between individual and collective productions. This comparison is not concerned only with the quality of the productions, but also with qualitative differences that could show processes of social influence. In this case, it is interesting to analyze the different modalities of social interaction and of reaching consensus. After a master lecture of a professor, 24 university students were requested to individually produce a conceptual map of the topic. The students were able to consult their notes. Finally, in pairs, they were asked to collaboratively develop a single conceptual map, consulting their respective individual conceptual maps, but not their notes, which were taken away. The analysis is based on a comparison, inside each pair, between the individual and the collective conceptual maps. This analysis includes both cognitive (content) and formal (graph) aspects. Two dimensions were considered: homogeneity-heterogeneity and symmetry-asymmetry of individual contributions. The crossing between these dimensions allowed to differentiate the modalities of the collective construction. Finally, the article analyses the relation between cognitive and formal aspects, which are not always in accordance. The most general conclusion is that, concerning the social construction of conceptual maps, the cognitive contribution of each subject/student to the collective production must be differentiated from the instrumental operation of drawing the map. Fil: Roselli, Nestor Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Psicología y Psicopedagogía. Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología y Psicopedagogía; Argentina |
description |
The main aim of this research is to recognize and differentiate several kinds or modalities of elaboration of a cognitive product in pairs, in this case, the elaboration of conceptual maps. These modalities come from a comparative analysis between individual and collective productions. This comparison is not concerned only with the quality of the productions, but also with qualitative differences that could show processes of social influence. In this case, it is interesting to analyze the different modalities of social interaction and of reaching consensus. After a master lecture of a professor, 24 university students were requested to individually produce a conceptual map of the topic. The students were able to consult their notes. Finally, in pairs, they were asked to collaboratively develop a single conceptual map, consulting their respective individual conceptual maps, but not their notes, which were taken away. The analysis is based on a comparison, inside each pair, between the individual and the collective conceptual maps. This analysis includes both cognitive (content) and formal (graph) aspects. Two dimensions were considered: homogeneity-heterogeneity and symmetry-asymmetry of individual contributions. The crossing between these dimensions allowed to differentiate the modalities of the collective construction. Finally, the article analyses the relation between cognitive and formal aspects, which are not always in accordance. The most general conclusion is that, concerning the social construction of conceptual maps, the cognitive contribution of each subject/student to the collective production must be differentiated from the instrumental operation of drawing the map. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75489 Roselli, Nestor Daniel; Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions; Science and Education; American Journal of Educational Research; 5; 10; 11-2017; 1058-1064 2327-6126 1058-1064 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/75489 |
identifier_str_mv |
Roselli, Nestor Daniel; Modalities to Collaborate in the Social Construction of Conceptual Maps: A Comparison between Individual and Collective Productions; Science and Education; American Journal of Educational Research; 5; 10; 11-2017; 1058-1064 2327-6126 1058-1064 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://pubs.sciepub.com/education/5/10/7/index.html info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12691/education-5-10-7 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Science and Education |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Science and Education |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1843606062445363200 |
score |
13.001348 |