nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models
- Autores
- Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Thomas, Peter A.; Benson, Andrew; Blaizot, Jeremy; Bower, Richard; Carretero, Jorge; Castander, Francisco J.; Cattaneo, Andrea; Cora, Sofia Alejandra; Croton, Darren J.; Cui, Weiguang; Cunnama, Daniel; De Lucia, Gabriella; Devriendt, Julien E.; Elahi, Pascal J.; Font, Andreea; Fontanot, Fabio; Garcia Bellido, Juan; Gargiulo, Ignacio Daniel; Gonzalez Perez, Violeta; Helly, John; Henriques, Bruno; Hirschmann, Michaela; Lee, Jaehyun; Mamon, Gary A.; Monaco, Pierluigi; Onions, Julian; Padilla, Nelson D.; Power, Chris; Pujol, Arnau; Skibba, Ramin A.; Somerville, Rachel S.; Srisawat, Chaichalit; Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio; Yi, Sukyoung K.
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We present a comparison of 14 galaxy formation models: 12 different semi-analytical models and 2 halo-occupation distribution models for galaxy formation based upon the same cosmological simulation and merger tree information derived from it. The participating codes have proven to be very successful in their own right but they have all been calibrated independently using various observational data sets, stellar models, and merger trees. In this paper we apply them without recalibration and this leads to a wide variety of predictions for the stellar mass function, specific star formation rates, stellar-tohalo mass ratios, and the abundance of orphan galaxies. The scatter is much larger than seen in previous comparison studies primarily because the codes have been used outside of their native environment within which they are well tested and calibrated. The purpose of the ?nIFTy comparison of galaxy formation models? is to bring together as many different galaxy formation modellers as possible and to investigate a common approach to model calibration. This paper provides a unified description for all participating models and presents the initial, uncalibrated comparison as a baseline for our future studies where we will develop a common calibration framework and address the extent to which that reduces the scatter in the model predictions seen here.
Fil: Knebe, Alexander. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España
Fil: Pearce, Frazer R.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido
Fil: Thomas, Peter A.. University of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Benson, Andrew. Carnegie Observatories; Estados Unidos
Fil: Blaizot, Jeremy. Universite Lyon 1; Francia
Fil: Bower, Richard. University Of Durham; Reino Unido
Fil: Carretero, Jorge. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona; España
Fil: Castander, Francisco J.. Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai; España
Fil: Cattaneo, Andrea. Observatoire de Paris; Francia
Fil: Cora, Sofia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas; Argentina
Fil: Croton, Darren J.. Swinburne University of Technology; Australia
Fil: Cui, Weiguang. University of Western Australia; Australia
Fil: Cunnama, Daniel. University of Western Cape; Sudáfrica
Fil: De Lucia, Gabriella. INAF. Astronomical Observatory of Trieste; Italia
Fil: Devriendt, Julien E.. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Elahi, Pascal J.. University of Sydney; Australia
Fil: Font, Andreea. Liverpool John Moores University; Reino Unido
Fil: Fontanot, Fabio. INAF. Astronomical Observatory of Trieste; Italia
Fil: Garcia Bellido, Juan. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España
Fil: Gargiulo, Ignacio Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas; Argentina
Fil: Gonzalez Perez, Violeta. University Of Durham; Reino Unido
Fil: Helly, John. University Of Durham; Reino Unido
Fil: Henriques, Bruno. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik; Alemania
Fil: Hirschmann, Michaela. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; Francia
Fil: Lee, Jaehyun. Yonsei University; Corea del Sur
Fil: Mamon, Gary A.. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; Francia
Fil: Monaco, Pierluigi. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Onions, Julian. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido
Fil: Padilla, Nelson D.. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: Power, Chris. University of Western Australia; Australia
Fil: Pujol, Arnau. Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai; España
Fil: Skibba, Ramin A.. University Of California At San Diego; Estados Unidos
Fil: Somerville, Rachel S.. Rutgers University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Srisawat, Chaichalit. University Of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Yi, Sukyoung K.. Yonsei University; Corea del Sur - Materia
-
N-body simulations
Haloes
Evolution of galaxies
Cosmology
Dark matter - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14108
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_8d05054ab2fb570cfa2c3f2fd2c0b62d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14108 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation modelsKnebe, AlexanderPearce, Frazer R.Thomas, Peter A.Benson, AndrewBlaizot, JeremyBower, RichardCarretero, JorgeCastander, Francisco J.Cattaneo, AndreaCora, Sofia AlejandraCroton, Darren J.Cui, WeiguangCunnama, DanielDe Lucia, GabriellaDevriendt, Julien E.Elahi, Pascal J.Font, AndreeaFontanot, FabioGarcia Bellido, JuanGargiulo, Ignacio DanielGonzalez Perez, VioletaHelly, JohnHenriques, BrunoHirschmann, MichaelaLee, JaehyunMamon, Gary A.Monaco, PierluigiOnions, JulianPadilla, Nelson D.Power, ChrisPujol, ArnauSkibba, Ramin A.Somerville, Rachel S.Srisawat, ChaichalitVega Martínez, Cristian AntonioYi, Sukyoung K.N-body simulationsHaloesEvolution of galaxiesCosmologyDark matterhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We present a comparison of 14 galaxy formation models: 12 different semi-analytical models and 2 halo-occupation distribution models for galaxy formation based upon the same cosmological simulation and merger tree information derived from it. The participating codes have proven to be very successful in their own right but they have all been calibrated independently using various observational data sets, stellar models, and merger trees. In this paper we apply them without recalibration and this leads to a wide variety of predictions for the stellar mass function, specific star formation rates, stellar-tohalo mass ratios, and the abundance of orphan galaxies. The scatter is much larger than seen in previous comparison studies primarily because the codes have been used outside of their native environment within which they are well tested and calibrated. The purpose of the ?nIFTy comparison of galaxy formation models? is to bring together as many different galaxy formation modellers as possible and to investigate a common approach to model calibration. This paper provides a unified description for all participating models and presents the initial, uncalibrated comparison as a baseline for our future studies where we will develop a common calibration framework and address the extent to which that reduces the scatter in the model predictions seen here.Fil: Knebe, Alexander. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Pearce, Frazer R.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino UnidoFil: Thomas, Peter A.. University of Sussex; Reino UnidoFil: Benson, Andrew. Carnegie Observatories; Estados UnidosFil: Blaizot, Jeremy. Universite Lyon 1; FranciaFil: Bower, Richard. University Of Durham; Reino UnidoFil: Carretero, Jorge. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona; EspañaFil: Castander, Francisco J.. Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai; EspañaFil: Cattaneo, Andrea. Observatoire de Paris; FranciaFil: Cora, Sofia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas; ArgentinaFil: Croton, Darren J.. Swinburne University of Technology; AustraliaFil: Cui, Weiguang. University of Western Australia; AustraliaFil: Cunnama, Daniel. University of Western Cape; SudáfricaFil: De Lucia, Gabriella. INAF. Astronomical Observatory of Trieste; ItaliaFil: Devriendt, Julien E.. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Elahi, Pascal J.. University of Sydney; AustraliaFil: Font, Andreea. Liverpool John Moores University; Reino UnidoFil: Fontanot, Fabio. INAF. Astronomical Observatory of Trieste; ItaliaFil: Garcia Bellido, Juan. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Gargiulo, Ignacio Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas; ArgentinaFil: Gonzalez Perez, Violeta. University Of Durham; Reino UnidoFil: Helly, John. University Of Durham; Reino UnidoFil: Henriques, Bruno. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik; AlemaniaFil: Hirschmann, Michaela. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; FranciaFil: Lee, Jaehyun. Yonsei University; Corea del SurFil: Mamon, Gary A.. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; FranciaFil: Monaco, Pierluigi. Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Onions, Julian. The University Of Nottingham; Reino UnidoFil: Padilla, Nelson D.. Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: Power, Chris. University of Western Australia; AustraliaFil: Pujol, Arnau. Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai; EspañaFil: Skibba, Ramin A.. University Of California At San Diego; Estados UnidosFil: Somerville, Rachel S.. Rutgers University; Estados UnidosFil: Srisawat, Chaichalit. University Of Sussex; Reino UnidoFil: Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Yi, Sukyoung K.. Yonsei University; Corea del SurOxford University Press2015-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/14108Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Thomas, Peter A.; Benson, Andrew; Blaizot, Jeremy; et al.; nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models; Oxford University Press; Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society; 451; 4; 6-2015; 4029-40490035-8711enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/arxiv/http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04607info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stv1149info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/mnras/stv1149info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:06:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/14108instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:06:58.806CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models |
| title |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models |
| spellingShingle |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models Knebe, Alexander N-body simulations Haloes Evolution of galaxies Cosmology Dark matter |
| title_short |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models |
| title_full |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models |
| title_fullStr |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models |
| title_full_unstemmed |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models |
| title_sort |
nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Knebe, Alexander Pearce, Frazer R. Thomas, Peter A. Benson, Andrew Blaizot, Jeremy Bower, Richard Carretero, Jorge Castander, Francisco J. Cattaneo, Andrea Cora, Sofia Alejandra Croton, Darren J. Cui, Weiguang Cunnama, Daniel De Lucia, Gabriella Devriendt, Julien E. Elahi, Pascal J. Font, Andreea Fontanot, Fabio Garcia Bellido, Juan Gargiulo, Ignacio Daniel Gonzalez Perez, Violeta Helly, John Henriques, Bruno Hirschmann, Michaela Lee, Jaehyun Mamon, Gary A. Monaco, Pierluigi Onions, Julian Padilla, Nelson D. Power, Chris Pujol, Arnau Skibba, Ramin A. Somerville, Rachel S. Srisawat, Chaichalit Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio Yi, Sukyoung K. |
| author |
Knebe, Alexander |
| author_facet |
Knebe, Alexander Pearce, Frazer R. Thomas, Peter A. Benson, Andrew Blaizot, Jeremy Bower, Richard Carretero, Jorge Castander, Francisco J. Cattaneo, Andrea Cora, Sofia Alejandra Croton, Darren J. Cui, Weiguang Cunnama, Daniel De Lucia, Gabriella Devriendt, Julien E. Elahi, Pascal J. Font, Andreea Fontanot, Fabio Garcia Bellido, Juan Gargiulo, Ignacio Daniel Gonzalez Perez, Violeta Helly, John Henriques, Bruno Hirschmann, Michaela Lee, Jaehyun Mamon, Gary A. Monaco, Pierluigi Onions, Julian Padilla, Nelson D. Power, Chris Pujol, Arnau Skibba, Ramin A. Somerville, Rachel S. Srisawat, Chaichalit Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio Yi, Sukyoung K. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Pearce, Frazer R. Thomas, Peter A. Benson, Andrew Blaizot, Jeremy Bower, Richard Carretero, Jorge Castander, Francisco J. Cattaneo, Andrea Cora, Sofia Alejandra Croton, Darren J. Cui, Weiguang Cunnama, Daniel De Lucia, Gabriella Devriendt, Julien E. Elahi, Pascal J. Font, Andreea Fontanot, Fabio Garcia Bellido, Juan Gargiulo, Ignacio Daniel Gonzalez Perez, Violeta Helly, John Henriques, Bruno Hirschmann, Michaela Lee, Jaehyun Mamon, Gary A. Monaco, Pierluigi Onions, Julian Padilla, Nelson D. Power, Chris Pujol, Arnau Skibba, Ramin A. Somerville, Rachel S. Srisawat, Chaichalit Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio Yi, Sukyoung K. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
N-body simulations Haloes Evolution of galaxies Cosmology Dark matter |
| topic |
N-body simulations Haloes Evolution of galaxies Cosmology Dark matter |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We present a comparison of 14 galaxy formation models: 12 different semi-analytical models and 2 halo-occupation distribution models for galaxy formation based upon the same cosmological simulation and merger tree information derived from it. The participating codes have proven to be very successful in their own right but they have all been calibrated independently using various observational data sets, stellar models, and merger trees. In this paper we apply them without recalibration and this leads to a wide variety of predictions for the stellar mass function, specific star formation rates, stellar-tohalo mass ratios, and the abundance of orphan galaxies. The scatter is much larger than seen in previous comparison studies primarily because the codes have been used outside of their native environment within which they are well tested and calibrated. The purpose of the ?nIFTy comparison of galaxy formation models? is to bring together as many different galaxy formation modellers as possible and to investigate a common approach to model calibration. This paper provides a unified description for all participating models and presents the initial, uncalibrated comparison as a baseline for our future studies where we will develop a common calibration framework and address the extent to which that reduces the scatter in the model predictions seen here. Fil: Knebe, Alexander. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España Fil: Pearce, Frazer R.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido Fil: Thomas, Peter A.. University of Sussex; Reino Unido Fil: Benson, Andrew. Carnegie Observatories; Estados Unidos Fil: Blaizot, Jeremy. Universite Lyon 1; Francia Fil: Bower, Richard. University Of Durham; Reino Unido Fil: Carretero, Jorge. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona; España Fil: Castander, Francisco J.. Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai; España Fil: Cattaneo, Andrea. Observatoire de Paris; Francia Fil: Cora, Sofia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas; Argentina Fil: Croton, Darren J.. Swinburne University of Technology; Australia Fil: Cui, Weiguang. University of Western Australia; Australia Fil: Cunnama, Daniel. University of Western Cape; Sudáfrica Fil: De Lucia, Gabriella. INAF. Astronomical Observatory of Trieste; Italia Fil: Devriendt, Julien E.. University of Oxford; Reino Unido Fil: Elahi, Pascal J.. University of Sydney; Australia Fil: Font, Andreea. Liverpool John Moores University; Reino Unido Fil: Fontanot, Fabio. INAF. Astronomical Observatory of Trieste; Italia Fil: Garcia Bellido, Juan. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España Fil: Gargiulo, Ignacio Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas; Argentina Fil: Gonzalez Perez, Violeta. University Of Durham; Reino Unido Fil: Helly, John. University Of Durham; Reino Unido Fil: Henriques, Bruno. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik; Alemania Fil: Hirschmann, Michaela. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; Francia Fil: Lee, Jaehyun. Yonsei University; Corea del Sur Fil: Mamon, Gary A.. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; Francia Fil: Monaco, Pierluigi. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile Fil: Onions, Julian. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido Fil: Padilla, Nelson D.. Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile Fil: Power, Chris. University of Western Australia; Australia Fil: Pujol, Arnau. Institut de Ciencies de l’Espai; España Fil: Skibba, Ramin A.. University Of California At San Diego; Estados Unidos Fil: Somerville, Rachel S.. Rutgers University; Estados Unidos Fil: Srisawat, Chaichalit. University Of Sussex; Reino Unido Fil: Vega Martínez, Cristian Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata; Argentina Fil: Yi, Sukyoung K.. Yonsei University; Corea del Sur |
| description |
We present a comparison of 14 galaxy formation models: 12 different semi-analytical models and 2 halo-occupation distribution models for galaxy formation based upon the same cosmological simulation and merger tree information derived from it. The participating codes have proven to be very successful in their own right but they have all been calibrated independently using various observational data sets, stellar models, and merger trees. In this paper we apply them without recalibration and this leads to a wide variety of predictions for the stellar mass function, specific star formation rates, stellar-tohalo mass ratios, and the abundance of orphan galaxies. The scatter is much larger than seen in previous comparison studies primarily because the codes have been used outside of their native environment within which they are well tested and calibrated. The purpose of the ?nIFTy comparison of galaxy formation models? is to bring together as many different galaxy formation modellers as possible and to investigate a common approach to model calibration. This paper provides a unified description for all participating models and presents the initial, uncalibrated comparison as a baseline for our future studies where we will develop a common calibration framework and address the extent to which that reduces the scatter in the model predictions seen here. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-06 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/14108 Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Thomas, Peter A.; Benson, Andrew; Blaizot, Jeremy; et al.; nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models; Oxford University Press; Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society; 451; 4; 6-2015; 4029-4049 0035-8711 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/14108 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Thomas, Peter A.; Benson, Andrew; Blaizot, Jeremy; et al.; nIFTy cosmology: comparison of galaxy formation models; Oxford University Press; Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society; 451; 4; 6-2015; 4029-4049 0035-8711 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/arxiv/http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04607 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stv1149 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/mnras/stv1149 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1842980302336557056 |
| score |
12.993085 |