La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo

Autores
Carman, Christian Carlos
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
To assert that the ancient planetary theory proposed by Ptolemy was irrefutable –at least until the telescope discovery- is a bit of a cliché. The aim of this paper is to analyze in what sense it could be said that the epicycle and deferent model proposed by Ptolemy to explain the planetary movement is irrefutable and in what sense it is not. To do this, we will use the conceptual framework developed by the Struturalist Conception, and in particular, the Moulines’ analysis of the "guiding principles".
Fil: Carman, Christian Carlos. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
IRREFUTABILIDAD
PTOLOMEO
EPICICLOS Y DEFERENTES
SERIES DE FOURIER
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192981

id CONICETDig_8bc534bda8498cc603654a1e40cd9ae1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192981
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de PtolomeoCarman, Christian CarlosIRREFUTABILIDADPTOLOMEOEPICICLOS Y DEFERENTESSERIES DE FOURIERhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6To assert that the ancient planetary theory proposed by Ptolemy was irrefutable –at least until the telescope discovery- is a bit of a cliché. The aim of this paper is to analyze in what sense it could be said that the epicycle and deferent model proposed by Ptolemy to explain the planetary movement is irrefutable and in what sense it is not. To do this, we will use the conceptual framework developed by the Struturalist Conception, and in particular, the Moulines’ analysis of the "guiding principles".Fil: Carman, Christian Carlos. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaUniversidad Federal de Santa Catarina2011-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/192981Carman, Christian Carlos; La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo; Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia; 14; 2; 8-2011; 211-2391414-42471808-1711CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p211info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:42:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/192981instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:42:41.58CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
title La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
spellingShingle La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
Carman, Christian Carlos
IRREFUTABILIDAD
PTOLOMEO
EPICICLOS Y DEFERENTES
SERIES DE FOURIER
title_short La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
title_full La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
title_fullStr La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
title_full_unstemmed La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
title_sort La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Carman, Christian Carlos
author Carman, Christian Carlos
author_facet Carman, Christian Carlos
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv IRREFUTABILIDAD
PTOLOMEO
EPICICLOS Y DEFERENTES
SERIES DE FOURIER
topic IRREFUTABILIDAD
PTOLOMEO
EPICICLOS Y DEFERENTES
SERIES DE FOURIER
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv To assert that the ancient planetary theory proposed by Ptolemy was irrefutable –at least until the telescope discovery- is a bit of a cliché. The aim of this paper is to analyze in what sense it could be said that the epicycle and deferent model proposed by Ptolemy to explain the planetary movement is irrefutable and in what sense it is not. To do this, we will use the conceptual framework developed by the Struturalist Conception, and in particular, the Moulines’ analysis of the "guiding principles".
Fil: Carman, Christian Carlos. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description To assert that the ancient planetary theory proposed by Ptolemy was irrefutable –at least until the telescope discovery- is a bit of a cliché. The aim of this paper is to analyze in what sense it could be said that the epicycle and deferent model proposed by Ptolemy to explain the planetary movement is irrefutable and in what sense it is not. To do this, we will use the conceptual framework developed by the Struturalist Conception, and in particular, the Moulines’ analysis of the "guiding principles".
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192981
Carman, Christian Carlos; La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo; Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia; 14; 2; 8-2011; 211-239
1414-4247
1808-1711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/192981
identifier_str_mv Carman, Christian Carlos; La refutabilidad del sistema de epiciclos y deferentes de Ptolomeo; Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina; Principia; 14; 2; 8-2011; 211-239
1414-4247
1808-1711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2010v14n2p211
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082929392877568
score 13.22299