Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.

Autores
Pereyra, Patricio Javier; Guiaşu, Radu Cornel
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
CommentDebate over the importance and meaning of nativerange in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.Patricio Javier Pereyra1,2,3∗and Radu Cornel Guia¸su41Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos Almirante Storni (CIMAS), San Antonio Oeste,RioNegro,Argentina2Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina3Escuela Superior de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, San Antonio Oeste, Rio Negro, Argentina4Biology Program, Glendon College, York University, 2275 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M6, CanadaIn their response to Pereyra (2020), Courchamp et al.(2020) considered problems with the concept of nativerange in invasion biology. They start by agreeing withPereyra that the concept of native range has limitations,but then proceed to criticize the work for what theyperceive as “flawed logical reasoning,” “a misleading se-lection of examples,” “cherry picking,” and a failure toappreciate the usefulness of this admittedly poorly de-fined concept. Here, we respond to the criticisms ofCourchamp et al., while addressing the important prob-lems that remain with the application of the native rangeconcept.
Fil: Pereyra, Patricio Javier. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni". - Provincia de Río Negro. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni". Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni"; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Escuela de Ciencias Marinas; Argentina
Fil: Guiaşu, Radu Cornel. York University; Canadá
Materia
native range
universal concept
biogeography
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/115213
Acceder
id CONICETDig_86a7f5d2d744bb775ffef377e2717b01
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/115213
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.Pereyra, Patricio JavierGuiaşu, Radu Cornelnative rangeuniversal conceptbiogeographyhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1CommentDebate over the importance and meaning of nativerange in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.Patricio Javier Pereyra1,2,3∗and Radu Cornel Guia¸su41Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos Almirante Storni (CIMAS), San Antonio Oeste,RioNegro,Argentina2Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina3Escuela Superior de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, San Antonio Oeste, Rio Negro, Argentina4Biology Program, Glendon College, York University, 2275 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M6, CanadaIn their response to Pereyra (2020), Courchamp et al.(2020) considered problems with the concept of nativerange in invasion biology. They start by agreeing withPereyra that the concept of native range has limitations,but then proceed to criticize the work for what theyperceive as “flawed logical reasoning,” “a misleading se-lection of examples,” “cherry picking,” and a failure toappreciate the usefulness of this admittedly poorly de-fined concept. Here, we respond to the criticisms ofCourchamp et al., while addressing the important prob-lems that remain with the application of the native rangeconcept.Fil: Pereyra, Patricio Javier. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni". - Provincia de Río Negro. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni". Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni"; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Escuela de Ciencias Marinas; ArgentinaFil: Guiaşu, Radu Cornel. York University; CanadáWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2020-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/115213Pereyra, Patricio Javier; Guiaşu, Radu Cornel; Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Conservation Biology; 34; 4; 8-2020; 1044-10460888-8892CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cobi.13529info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cobi.13529info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:40:16Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/115213instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:40:17.185CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
title Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
spellingShingle Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
Pereyra, Patricio Javier
native range
universal concept
biogeography
title_short Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
title_full Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
title_fullStr Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
title_full_unstemmed Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
title_sort Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pereyra, Patricio Javier
Guiaşu, Radu Cornel
author Pereyra, Patricio Javier
author_facet Pereyra, Patricio Javier
Guiaşu, Radu Cornel
author_role author
author2 Guiaşu, Radu Cornel
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv native range
universal concept
biogeography
topic native range
universal concept
biogeography
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv CommentDebate over the importance and meaning of nativerange in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.Patricio Javier Pereyra1,2,3∗and Radu Cornel Guia¸su41Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos Almirante Storni (CIMAS), San Antonio Oeste,RioNegro,Argentina2Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina3Escuela Superior de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, San Antonio Oeste, Rio Negro, Argentina4Biology Program, Glendon College, York University, 2275 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M6, CanadaIn their response to Pereyra (2020), Courchamp et al.(2020) considered problems with the concept of nativerange in invasion biology. They start by agreeing withPereyra that the concept of native range has limitations,but then proceed to criticize the work for what theyperceive as “flawed logical reasoning,” “a misleading se-lection of examples,” “cherry picking,” and a failure toappreciate the usefulness of this admittedly poorly de-fined concept. Here, we respond to the criticisms ofCourchamp et al., while addressing the important prob-lems that remain with the application of the native rangeconcept.
Fil: Pereyra, Patricio Javier. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni". - Provincia de Río Negro. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni". Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet Centro Nacional Patagónico. Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos "Almirante Storni"; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Escuela de Ciencias Marinas; Argentina
Fil: Guiaşu, Radu Cornel. York University; Canadá
description CommentDebate over the importance and meaning of nativerange in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.Patricio Javier Pereyra1,2,3∗and Radu Cornel Guia¸su41Centro de Investigación Aplicada y Transferencia Tecnológica en Recursos Marinos Almirante Storni (CIMAS), San Antonio Oeste,RioNegro,Argentina2Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina3Escuela Superior de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, San Antonio Oeste, Rio Negro, Argentina4Biology Program, Glendon College, York University, 2275 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M6, CanadaIn their response to Pereyra (2020), Courchamp et al.(2020) considered problems with the concept of nativerange in invasion biology. They start by agreeing withPereyra that the concept of native range has limitations,but then proceed to criticize the work for what theyperceive as “flawed logical reasoning,” “a misleading se-lection of examples,” “cherry picking,” and a failure toappreciate the usefulness of this admittedly poorly de-fined concept. Here, we respond to the criticisms ofCourchamp et al., while addressing the important prob-lems that remain with the application of the native rangeconcept.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/115213
Pereyra, Patricio Javier; Guiaşu, Radu Cornel; Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Conservation Biology; 34; 4; 8-2020; 1044-1046
0888-8892
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/115213
identifier_str_mv Pereyra, Patricio Javier; Guiaşu, Radu Cornel; Debate over the importance and meaning of native range in invasion biology: reply to Courchamp et al.; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Conservation Biology; 34; 4; 8-2020; 1044-1046
0888-8892
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cobi.13529
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cobi.13529
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613275072856064
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares