Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
- Autores
- Timbrell, Lucy; de la Peña, Paloma; Way, Amy; Hoggard, Christian; Backwell, Lucinda Ruth; d’Errico, Francesco; Wadley, Lyn; Grove, Matt
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Lithic assemblages immediately following the Howiesons Poort, often loosely referred to as the ‘post-Howiesons Poort’ or MSA III, have attracted relatively little attention when compared to other well-known phases of the South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sequence. Current evidence from sites occurring in widely-differing environments suggests that these assemblages are marked by temporal and technological variability, with few features in common other than the presence of unifacial points. Here we present a technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘points’ from the new excavations of Members 2 BS, 2 WA and the top of 3 BS members at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, one of the key sites for studying modern human cultural evolution. Our complementary methodologies demonstrate that, at this site, hominins adopted a knapping strategy that primarily produced non-standardised unretouched points. Triangular morphologies were manufactured using a variety of reduction strategies, of which the discoidal and Levallois recurrent centripetal methods produced distinctive morphologies. We find technological and morphological variability increases throughout the post-Howiesons Poort sequence, with clear differences between and within chrono-stratigraphic groups. Finally, we assess the suitability of the ‘Sibudan’ cultural-technological typology proposed for post-Howiesons Poort assemblages at Sibhudu, another KwaZulu-Natal site, and find similarities in the morphological axes characterising the samples, despite differences in the shaping strategies adopted. Overall, our work contributes to the growing body of research that is helping to address historical research biases that have slanted our understanding of cultural evolution during the MSA of southern Africa towards the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort technocomplexes.
Fil: Timbrell, Lucy. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido
Fil: de la Peña, Paloma. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos. Universidad de Granada; España. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica
Fil: Way, Amy. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica
Fil: Hoggard, Christian. University of Southampton; Reino Unido
Fil: Backwell, Lucinda Ruth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica
Fil: d’Errico, Francesco. University of Bergen; Noruega. Universite de Bordeaux; Francia
Fil: Wadley, Lyn. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica
Fil: Grove, Matt. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido - Materia
-
CHAÎNE OPÉRATOIRE
LITHIC TECHNOLOGY
MIDDLE STONE AGE
OUTLINE-BASED GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS
STONE TOOLS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/215225
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_83af5636fa7a1b425c6a7f7b23e141bb |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/215225 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South AfricaTimbrell, Lucyde la Peña, PalomaWay, AmyHoggard, ChristianBackwell, Lucinda Ruthd’Errico, FrancescoWadley, LynGrove, MattCHAÎNE OPÉRATOIRELITHIC TECHNOLOGYMIDDLE STONE AGEOUTLINE-BASED GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICSSTONE TOOLShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Lithic assemblages immediately following the Howiesons Poort, often loosely referred to as the ‘post-Howiesons Poort’ or MSA III, have attracted relatively little attention when compared to other well-known phases of the South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sequence. Current evidence from sites occurring in widely-differing environments suggests that these assemblages are marked by temporal and technological variability, with few features in common other than the presence of unifacial points. Here we present a technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘points’ from the new excavations of Members 2 BS, 2 WA and the top of 3 BS members at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, one of the key sites for studying modern human cultural evolution. Our complementary methodologies demonstrate that, at this site, hominins adopted a knapping strategy that primarily produced non-standardised unretouched points. Triangular morphologies were manufactured using a variety of reduction strategies, of which the discoidal and Levallois recurrent centripetal methods produced distinctive morphologies. We find technological and morphological variability increases throughout the post-Howiesons Poort sequence, with clear differences between and within chrono-stratigraphic groups. Finally, we assess the suitability of the ‘Sibudan’ cultural-technological typology proposed for post-Howiesons Poort assemblages at Sibhudu, another KwaZulu-Natal site, and find similarities in the morphological axes characterising the samples, despite differences in the shaping strategies adopted. Overall, our work contributes to the growing body of research that is helping to address historical research biases that have slanted our understanding of cultural evolution during the MSA of southern Africa towards the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort technocomplexes.Fil: Timbrell, Lucy. University of Liverpool; Reino UnidoFil: de la Peña, Paloma. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos. Universidad de Granada; España. University of the Witwatersrand; SudáfricaFil: Way, Amy. University of the Witwatersrand; SudáfricaFil: Hoggard, Christian. University of Southampton; Reino UnidoFil: Backwell, Lucinda Ruth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of the Witwatersrand; SudáfricaFil: d’Errico, Francesco. University of Bergen; Noruega. Universite de Bordeaux; FranciaFil: Wadley, Lyn. University of the Witwatersrand; SudáfricaFil: Grove, Matt. University of Liverpool; Reino UnidoPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd2022-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/215225Timbrell, Lucy; de la Peña, Paloma; Way, Amy; Hoggard, Christian; Backwell, Lucinda Ruth; et al.; Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Quaternary Science Reviews; 297; 12-2022; 1-270277-3791CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:26:21Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/215225instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:26:22.007CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
| title |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
| spellingShingle |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa Timbrell, Lucy CHAÎNE OPÉRATOIRE LITHIC TECHNOLOGY MIDDLE STONE AGE OUTLINE-BASED GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS STONE TOOLS |
| title_short |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
| title_full |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
| title_fullStr |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
| title_sort |
Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Timbrell, Lucy de la Peña, Paloma Way, Amy Hoggard, Christian Backwell, Lucinda Ruth d’Errico, Francesco Wadley, Lyn Grove, Matt |
| author |
Timbrell, Lucy |
| author_facet |
Timbrell, Lucy de la Peña, Paloma Way, Amy Hoggard, Christian Backwell, Lucinda Ruth d’Errico, Francesco Wadley, Lyn Grove, Matt |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
de la Peña, Paloma Way, Amy Hoggard, Christian Backwell, Lucinda Ruth d’Errico, Francesco Wadley, Lyn Grove, Matt |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CHAÎNE OPÉRATOIRE LITHIC TECHNOLOGY MIDDLE STONE AGE OUTLINE-BASED GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS STONE TOOLS |
| topic |
CHAÎNE OPÉRATOIRE LITHIC TECHNOLOGY MIDDLE STONE AGE OUTLINE-BASED GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS STONE TOOLS |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Lithic assemblages immediately following the Howiesons Poort, often loosely referred to as the ‘post-Howiesons Poort’ or MSA III, have attracted relatively little attention when compared to other well-known phases of the South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sequence. Current evidence from sites occurring in widely-differing environments suggests that these assemblages are marked by temporal and technological variability, with few features in common other than the presence of unifacial points. Here we present a technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘points’ from the new excavations of Members 2 BS, 2 WA and the top of 3 BS members at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, one of the key sites for studying modern human cultural evolution. Our complementary methodologies demonstrate that, at this site, hominins adopted a knapping strategy that primarily produced non-standardised unretouched points. Triangular morphologies were manufactured using a variety of reduction strategies, of which the discoidal and Levallois recurrent centripetal methods produced distinctive morphologies. We find technological and morphological variability increases throughout the post-Howiesons Poort sequence, with clear differences between and within chrono-stratigraphic groups. Finally, we assess the suitability of the ‘Sibudan’ cultural-technological typology proposed for post-Howiesons Poort assemblages at Sibhudu, another KwaZulu-Natal site, and find similarities in the morphological axes characterising the samples, despite differences in the shaping strategies adopted. Overall, our work contributes to the growing body of research that is helping to address historical research biases that have slanted our understanding of cultural evolution during the MSA of southern Africa towards the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort technocomplexes. Fil: Timbrell, Lucy. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido Fil: de la Peña, Paloma. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos. Universidad de Granada; España. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica Fil: Way, Amy. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica Fil: Hoggard, Christian. University of Southampton; Reino Unido Fil: Backwell, Lucinda Ruth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica Fil: d’Errico, Francesco. University of Bergen; Noruega. Universite de Bordeaux; Francia Fil: Wadley, Lyn. University of the Witwatersrand; Sudáfrica Fil: Grove, Matt. University of Liverpool; Reino Unido |
| description |
Lithic assemblages immediately following the Howiesons Poort, often loosely referred to as the ‘post-Howiesons Poort’ or MSA III, have attracted relatively little attention when compared to other well-known phases of the South African Middle Stone Age (MSA) sequence. Current evidence from sites occurring in widely-differing environments suggests that these assemblages are marked by temporal and technological variability, with few features in common other than the presence of unifacial points. Here we present a technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘points’ from the new excavations of Members 2 BS, 2 WA and the top of 3 BS members at Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, one of the key sites for studying modern human cultural evolution. Our complementary methodologies demonstrate that, at this site, hominins adopted a knapping strategy that primarily produced non-standardised unretouched points. Triangular morphologies were manufactured using a variety of reduction strategies, of which the discoidal and Levallois recurrent centripetal methods produced distinctive morphologies. We find technological and morphological variability increases throughout the post-Howiesons Poort sequence, with clear differences between and within chrono-stratigraphic groups. Finally, we assess the suitability of the ‘Sibudan’ cultural-technological typology proposed for post-Howiesons Poort assemblages at Sibhudu, another KwaZulu-Natal site, and find similarities in the morphological axes characterising the samples, despite differences in the shaping strategies adopted. Overall, our work contributes to the growing body of research that is helping to address historical research biases that have slanted our understanding of cultural evolution during the MSA of southern Africa towards the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort technocomplexes. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/215225 Timbrell, Lucy; de la Peña, Paloma; Way, Amy; Hoggard, Christian; Backwell, Lucinda Ruth; et al.; Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Quaternary Science Reviews; 297; 12-2022; 1-27 0277-3791 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/215225 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Timbrell, Lucy; de la Peña, Paloma; Way, Amy; Hoggard, Christian; Backwell, Lucinda Ruth; et al.; Technological and geometric morphometric analysis of ‘post-Howiesons Poort points’ from Border Cave, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Quaternary Science Reviews; 297; 12-2022; 1-27 0277-3791 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107813 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1846781821298147328 |
| score |
12.982451 |