Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities

Autores
del Rio, María Gimena; Elena González Blanco García; O'Donnell, Daniel
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
he theme of this session is the Digital Humanities as a ?Boundary Land? - i.e. a locus in which such objects are common. As O´Donnell argues in his paper, this aspect is one of the defining features of contemporary Digital Humanities and an important cause of its recent rapid growth. As the field grows, DH workshops, panels, and journals see increasing work by practitioners trained in more and more traditionally distinct disciplinary traditions: textual scholars, literary critics, historians, New Media specialists, as well as theologians, computer scientists, archaeologists, Cultural Heritage specialists... and geographers, physicists, biologists, and medical professionals.It is the contention of the speakers of this panel that interpersonal diversity (i.e. diversity along lines such as gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, language, economic region, etc.) is as an important element of this aspect of DH. The Digital Humanities is not only a place where different disciplines work together (and at times at odds to each other): it is also a place where different people work together and at odds in developing our field. In other words, diversity initiatives in the Digital Humanities are important not only because they let more people into our field, they are important because they change the nature of our field as its practice widens.The papers in this session each approach the issue from a different perspective. In the first paper, O?Donnell looks at the theoretical background to this understanding of diversity as a component of DH as a boundary discipline, grounding his approach in early work on interdisciplinarity and boundary work. In the second paper, Murray Ray and Bordalejo discuss the ways in which efforts to promote diversity within DH can paradoxically undermine its theoretical importance to the field, before turning to different examples of diversity´s intellectual importance. In the third paper, del Rio and González-Blanco examine the institutional and social pressures that promote and hinder dialogue among researchers in developing and developed countries and across linguistic and other boundaries before proposing new approaches in Digital Humanities that go beyond lingüistic diversity focusing on theories such as Sociology of Culture and Education and other reformulations.
Fil: del Rio, María Gimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliográficas y Crítica Textual. IIBICRIT - Subsede "Seminario Orduna"; Argentina
Fil: Elena González Blanco García. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia; España
Fil: O'Donnell, Daniel. University of Lethbridge; Canadá
Digital Humanities 2016: Conference
Cracovia
Polonia
Jagiellonian University
Pedagogical University
Materia
DIGITAL HUMANITIES
SCIENTIFIC FIELD
DISCIPLINES
ACADEMIA
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229727

id CONICETDig_835df99d88577bff972ba8e59feb15cf
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229727
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanitiesdel Rio, María GimenaElena González Blanco GarcíaO'Donnell, DanielDIGITAL HUMANITIESSCIENTIFIC FIELDDISCIPLINESACADEMIAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6he theme of this session is the Digital Humanities as a ?Boundary Land? - i.e. a locus in which such objects are common. As O´Donnell argues in his paper, this aspect is one of the defining features of contemporary Digital Humanities and an important cause of its recent rapid growth. As the field grows, DH workshops, panels, and journals see increasing work by practitioners trained in more and more traditionally distinct disciplinary traditions: textual scholars, literary critics, historians, New Media specialists, as well as theologians, computer scientists, archaeologists, Cultural Heritage specialists... and geographers, physicists, biologists, and medical professionals.It is the contention of the speakers of this panel that interpersonal diversity (i.e. diversity along lines such as gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, language, economic region, etc.) is as an important element of this aspect of DH. The Digital Humanities is not only a place where different disciplines work together (and at times at odds to each other): it is also a place where different people work together and at odds in developing our field. In other words, diversity initiatives in the Digital Humanities are important not only because they let more people into our field, they are important because they change the nature of our field as its practice widens.The papers in this session each approach the issue from a different perspective. In the first paper, O?Donnell looks at the theoretical background to this understanding of diversity as a component of DH as a boundary discipline, grounding his approach in early work on interdisciplinarity and boundary work. In the second paper, Murray Ray and Bordalejo discuss the ways in which efforts to promote diversity within DH can paradoxically undermine its theoretical importance to the field, before turning to different examples of diversity´s intellectual importance. In the third paper, del Rio and González-Blanco examine the institutional and social pressures that promote and hinder dialogue among researchers in developing and developed countries and across linguistic and other boundaries before proposing new approaches in Digital Humanities that go beyond lingüistic diversity focusing on theories such as Sociology of Culture and Education and other reformulations.Fil: del Rio, María Gimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliográficas y Crítica Textual. IIBICRIT - Subsede "Seminario Orduna"; ArgentinaFil: Elena González Blanco García. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia; EspañaFil: O'Donnell, Daniel. University of Lethbridge; CanadáDigital Humanities 2016: ConferenceCracoviaPoloniaJagiellonian UniversityPedagogical UniversityJagiellonian University; Pedagogical University2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/229727Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities; Digital Humanities 2016: Conference; Cracovia; Polonia; 2016; 1-5978–83–942760–3–4CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dh2016.adho.org/abstracts/406Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:38:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/229727instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:38:29.235CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
title Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
spellingShingle Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
del Rio, María Gimena
DIGITAL HUMANITIES
SCIENTIFIC FIELD
DISCIPLINES
ACADEMIA
title_short Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
title_full Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
title_fullStr Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
title_full_unstemmed Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
title_sort Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv del Rio, María Gimena
Elena González Blanco García
O'Donnell, Daniel
author del Rio, María Gimena
author_facet del Rio, María Gimena
Elena González Blanco García
O'Donnell, Daniel
author_role author
author2 Elena González Blanco García
O'Donnell, Daniel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DIGITAL HUMANITIES
SCIENTIFIC FIELD
DISCIPLINES
ACADEMIA
topic DIGITAL HUMANITIES
SCIENTIFIC FIELD
DISCIPLINES
ACADEMIA
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv he theme of this session is the Digital Humanities as a ?Boundary Land? - i.e. a locus in which such objects are common. As O´Donnell argues in his paper, this aspect is one of the defining features of contemporary Digital Humanities and an important cause of its recent rapid growth. As the field grows, DH workshops, panels, and journals see increasing work by practitioners trained in more and more traditionally distinct disciplinary traditions: textual scholars, literary critics, historians, New Media specialists, as well as theologians, computer scientists, archaeologists, Cultural Heritage specialists... and geographers, physicists, biologists, and medical professionals.It is the contention of the speakers of this panel that interpersonal diversity (i.e. diversity along lines such as gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, language, economic region, etc.) is as an important element of this aspect of DH. The Digital Humanities is not only a place where different disciplines work together (and at times at odds to each other): it is also a place where different people work together and at odds in developing our field. In other words, diversity initiatives in the Digital Humanities are important not only because they let more people into our field, they are important because they change the nature of our field as its practice widens.The papers in this session each approach the issue from a different perspective. In the first paper, O?Donnell looks at the theoretical background to this understanding of diversity as a component of DH as a boundary discipline, grounding his approach in early work on interdisciplinarity and boundary work. In the second paper, Murray Ray and Bordalejo discuss the ways in which efforts to promote diversity within DH can paradoxically undermine its theoretical importance to the field, before turning to different examples of diversity´s intellectual importance. In the third paper, del Rio and González-Blanco examine the institutional and social pressures that promote and hinder dialogue among researchers in developing and developed countries and across linguistic and other boundaries before proposing new approaches in Digital Humanities that go beyond lingüistic diversity focusing on theories such as Sociology of Culture and Education and other reformulations.
Fil: del Rio, María Gimena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliográficas y Crítica Textual. IIBICRIT - Subsede "Seminario Orduna"; Argentina
Fil: Elena González Blanco García. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia; España
Fil: O'Donnell, Daniel. University of Lethbridge; Canadá
Digital Humanities 2016: Conference
Cracovia
Polonia
Jagiellonian University
Pedagogical University
description he theme of this session is the Digital Humanities as a ?Boundary Land? - i.e. a locus in which such objects are common. As O´Donnell argues in his paper, this aspect is one of the defining features of contemporary Digital Humanities and an important cause of its recent rapid growth. As the field grows, DH workshops, panels, and journals see increasing work by practitioners trained in more and more traditionally distinct disciplinary traditions: textual scholars, literary critics, historians, New Media specialists, as well as theologians, computer scientists, archaeologists, Cultural Heritage specialists... and geographers, physicists, biologists, and medical professionals.It is the contention of the speakers of this panel that interpersonal diversity (i.e. diversity along lines such as gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, language, economic region, etc.) is as an important element of this aspect of DH. The Digital Humanities is not only a place where different disciplines work together (and at times at odds to each other): it is also a place where different people work together and at odds in developing our field. In other words, diversity initiatives in the Digital Humanities are important not only because they let more people into our field, they are important because they change the nature of our field as its practice widens.The papers in this session each approach the issue from a different perspective. In the first paper, O?Donnell looks at the theoretical background to this understanding of diversity as a component of DH as a boundary discipline, grounding his approach in early work on interdisciplinarity and boundary work. In the second paper, Murray Ray and Bordalejo discuss the ways in which efforts to promote diversity within DH can paradoxically undermine its theoretical importance to the field, before turning to different examples of diversity´s intellectual importance. In the third paper, del Rio and González-Blanco examine the institutional and social pressures that promote and hinder dialogue among researchers in developing and developed countries and across linguistic and other boundaries before proposing new approaches in Digital Humanities that go beyond lingüistic diversity focusing on theories such as Sociology of Culture and Education and other reformulations.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/229727
Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities; Digital Humanities 2016: Conference; Cracovia; Polonia; 2016; 1-5
978–83–942760–3–4
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/229727
identifier_str_mv Boundary land: diversity as a defining feature of the Digital Humanities; Digital Humanities 2016: Conference; Cracovia; Polonia; 2016; 1-5
978–83–942760–3–4
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dh2016.adho.org/abstracts/406
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Jagiellonian University; Pedagogical University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Jagiellonian University; Pedagogical University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614407661813760
score 13.070432