The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity

Autores
la Greca, María Inés
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing.  First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject.
Fil: la Greca, María Inés. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
philosophy of history
narrativism
Hayden White
middle voice writing
figuration
performativity
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105487

id CONICETDig_8030512e5b1ad33ea9ac3800acb7529d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105487
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativityla Greca, María Inésphilosophy of historynarrativismHayden Whitemiddle voice writingfigurationperformativityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing.  First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject.Fil: la Greca, María Inés. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBrill2014-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/105487la Greca, María Inés; The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity; Brill; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 8; 2; 7-2014; 196-2161872-261XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brill.com/view/journals/jph/8/2/article-p196_4.xml?lang=eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18722636-12341271info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:36:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105487instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:36:32.844CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
title The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
spellingShingle The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
la Greca, María Inés
philosophy of history
narrativism
Hayden White
middle voice writing
figuration
performativity
title_short The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
title_full The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
title_fullStr The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
title_full_unstemmed The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
title_sort The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv la Greca, María Inés
author la Greca, María Inés
author_facet la Greca, María Inés
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv philosophy of history
narrativism
Hayden White
middle voice writing
figuration
performativity
topic philosophy of history
narrativism
Hayden White
middle voice writing
figuration
performativity
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing.  First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject.
Fil: la Greca, María Inés. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing.  First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/105487
la Greca, María Inés; The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity; Brill; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 8; 2; 7-2014; 196-216
1872-261X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/105487
identifier_str_mv la Greca, María Inés; The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity; Brill; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 8; 2; 7-2014; 196-216
1872-261X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brill.com/view/journals/jph/8/2/article-p196_4.xml?lang=en
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18722636-12341271
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brill
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brill
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083488418103296
score 13.22299