The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity
- Autores
- la Greca, María Inés
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing. First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject.
Fil: la Greca, María Inés. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
philosophy of history
narrativism
Hayden White
middle voice writing
figuration
performativity - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105487
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_8030512e5b1ad33ea9ac3800acb7529d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105487 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativityla Greca, María Inésphilosophy of historynarrativismHayden Whitemiddle voice writingfigurationperformativityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing. First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject.Fil: la Greca, María Inés. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBrill2014-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/105487la Greca, María Inés; The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity; Brill; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 8; 2; 7-2014; 196-2161872-261XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brill.com/view/journals/jph/8/2/article-p196_4.xml?lang=eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18722636-12341271info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:36:32Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105487instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:36:32.844CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity |
title |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity |
spellingShingle |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity la Greca, María Inés philosophy of history narrativism Hayden White middle voice writing figuration performativity |
title_short |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity |
title_full |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity |
title_fullStr |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity |
title_sort |
The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
la Greca, María Inés |
author |
la Greca, María Inés |
author_facet |
la Greca, María Inés |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
philosophy of history narrativism Hayden White middle voice writing figuration performativity |
topic |
philosophy of history narrativism Hayden White middle voice writing figuration performativity |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing. First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject. Fil: la Greca, María Inés. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tres de Febrero; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Hayden White inaugurated narrativism in philosophy of history when he effected a productive displacement of earlier epistemological discussions around the relationship between narration and historical knowledge: White identified the problem of narrative in history with the problem of the use of figurative language in the representation of the past. Thus, he enabled a new way of thinking philosophy of history’s object of study by paying attention to an aspect of historical practice he considered wrongly overlooked: the writing of history. His formal theory of the historical work needs no introduction. Instead, this paper aims at reclaiming the fundamental philosophical legacy White has left us in his latest work on middle voice writing. First, I will frame White’s thought as a response to what I call the paradoxical nature of historical narrative, as Louis Mink and Roland Barthes understand it. By presenting our narrativist past as White’s ironical and liberating stance on historical narrative, I will show how he identified figuration as the paradoxical resource and constrain of historical writing. Secondly, I will elaborate on his latest inquiries into middle voice writing as pointing the way into the future of philosophy of history. Thus, I will claim that the notion of middle voice writing that White adopted from Roland Barthes should be read from the point of view of performativity theory in order to reassess the philosophical nature of historical writing now considered as the performative self-constitution of the historical subject. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/105487 la Greca, María Inés; The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity; Brill; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 8; 2; 7-2014; 196-216 1872-261X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/105487 |
identifier_str_mv |
la Greca, María Inés; The Future of Philosophy of History from its Narrativist Past: Figuration, Middle Voice Writing and Performativity; Brill; Journal of the Philosophy of History; 8; 2; 7-2014; 196-216 1872-261X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brill.com/view/journals/jph/8/2/article-p196_4.xml?lang=en info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18722636-12341271 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brill |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brill |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083488418103296 |
score |
13.22299 |