Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)

Autores
Bidau, Claudio Juan; Marti, Dardo Andrea; Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is almost universal in animals. Rensch?s rule proposes that SSD increases with increasing average body size in taxa where males are larger than females (male- biased SSD; MBSSD) and decreases when females are larger (femalebiased SSD; FBSSD). Although it was proposed thatboth patterns are part of the same evolutionary trend, there is more evidence for Rensch?s rule in the first case. We analyzed SSD in the acridid subfamily Melanoplinae ina sample of 718 species and subspecies covering all tribes and representative genera. As in all Orthopera, SSD is female-biased. Body length was used as a proxy for body size. Mean body size within the subfamily varied between 9 and 34.5 mm in males (N= 812) and 12.75 and 44.0 mm in females (N= 735). Except for five species (0.7%) all taxa (from subfamily to subspecies) showed moderate to strong FBSSD (mean= 1.27). The lowest SSD was observed in Melanoplus chumash(SSD= 1.01), and the highest in Phaedrotettix aptera coquinae(SSD= 1.83). To test Rensch?s rule we performed reduced major axis (RMA) regressions between log10 (male body length) and log10 (female body length). In no case RMA slopes were significantly higher than 1.0 which would signal Rensch?s rule. Thus, Melanoplinae representsa new case of FBSSD where Rensch?s rule is not verified. The proximatecauses of FBSSD and the non-occurrence of Rensch?s rule in the Orthoptera are discussed as well as the relationship between SSD patterns at the intra- and supraspecific levels.
Fil: Bidau, Claudio Juan. Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro; Argentina
Fil: Marti, Dardo Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Humanidades y Cs.sociales. Departamento de Genetica. Laboratorio de Genetica Evolutiva y Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Humanidades y Cs.sociales. Departamento de Genetica. Laboratorio de Genetica Evolutiva y Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Body size
Melanoplinae
Model II regression
sexual size dimorphism
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/8551

id CONICETDig_7f6bce283616910ea4a5d49b80f6fbb8
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/8551
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)Bidau, Claudio JuanMarti, Dardo AndreaCastillo, Elio Rodrigo DanielBody sizeMelanoplinaeModel II regressionsexual size dimorphismhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is almost universal in animals. Rensch?s rule proposes that SSD increases with increasing average body size in taxa where males are larger than females (male- biased SSD; MBSSD) and decreases when females are larger (femalebiased SSD; FBSSD). Although it was proposed thatboth patterns are part of the same evolutionary trend, there is more evidence for Rensch?s rule in the first case. We analyzed SSD in the acridid subfamily Melanoplinae ina sample of 718 species and subspecies covering all tribes and representative genera. As in all Orthopera, SSD is female-biased. Body length was used as a proxy for body size. Mean body size within the subfamily varied between 9 and 34.5 mm in males (N= 812) and 12.75 and 44.0 mm in females (N= 735). Except for five species (0.7%) all taxa (from subfamily to subspecies) showed moderate to strong FBSSD (mean= 1.27). The lowest SSD was observed in Melanoplus chumash(SSD= 1.01), and the highest in Phaedrotettix aptera coquinae(SSD= 1.83). To test Rensch?s rule we performed reduced major axis (RMA) regressions between log10 (male body length) and log10 (female body length). In no case RMA slopes were significantly higher than 1.0 which would signal Rensch?s rule. Thus, Melanoplinae representsa new case of FBSSD where Rensch?s rule is not verified. The proximatecauses of FBSSD and the non-occurrence of Rensch?s rule in the Orthoptera are discussed as well as the relationship between SSD patterns at the intra- and supraspecific levels.Fil: Bidau, Claudio Juan. Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro; ArgentinaFil: Marti, Dardo Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Humanidades y Cs.sociales. Departamento de Genetica. Laboratorio de Genetica Evolutiva y Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Humanidades y Cs.sociales. Departamento de Genetica. Laboratorio de Genetica Evolutiva y Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaInsect Biodiversity Research Group2013-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/8551Bidau, Claudio Juan; Marti, Dardo Andrea; Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel; Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae); Insect Biodiversity Research Group; Journal of Insect Biodiversity; 1; 12; 12-2013; 1-142147-7612enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.insectbiodiversity.org/index.php/jib/article/view/28/pdf_13info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12976/jib/2013.1.12info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:15:26Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/8551instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:15:26.866CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
title Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
spellingShingle Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
Bidau, Claudio Juan
Body size
Melanoplinae
Model II regression
sexual size dimorphism
title_short Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
title_full Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
title_fullStr Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
title_full_unstemmed Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
title_sort Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bidau, Claudio Juan
Marti, Dardo Andrea
Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel
author Bidau, Claudio Juan
author_facet Bidau, Claudio Juan
Marti, Dardo Andrea
Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel
author_role author
author2 Marti, Dardo Andrea
Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Body size
Melanoplinae
Model II regression
sexual size dimorphism
topic Body size
Melanoplinae
Model II regression
sexual size dimorphism
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is almost universal in animals. Rensch?s rule proposes that SSD increases with increasing average body size in taxa where males are larger than females (male- biased SSD; MBSSD) and decreases when females are larger (femalebiased SSD; FBSSD). Although it was proposed thatboth patterns are part of the same evolutionary trend, there is more evidence for Rensch?s rule in the first case. We analyzed SSD in the acridid subfamily Melanoplinae ina sample of 718 species and subspecies covering all tribes and representative genera. As in all Orthopera, SSD is female-biased. Body length was used as a proxy for body size. Mean body size within the subfamily varied between 9 and 34.5 mm in males (N= 812) and 12.75 and 44.0 mm in females (N= 735). Except for five species (0.7%) all taxa (from subfamily to subspecies) showed moderate to strong FBSSD (mean= 1.27). The lowest SSD was observed in Melanoplus chumash(SSD= 1.01), and the highest in Phaedrotettix aptera coquinae(SSD= 1.83). To test Rensch?s rule we performed reduced major axis (RMA) regressions between log10 (male body length) and log10 (female body length). In no case RMA slopes were significantly higher than 1.0 which would signal Rensch?s rule. Thus, Melanoplinae representsa new case of FBSSD where Rensch?s rule is not verified. The proximatecauses of FBSSD and the non-occurrence of Rensch?s rule in the Orthoptera are discussed as well as the relationship between SSD patterns at the intra- and supraspecific levels.
Fil: Bidau, Claudio Juan. Universidad Nacional de Rio Negro; Argentina
Fil: Marti, Dardo Andrea. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Humanidades y Cs.sociales. Departamento de Genetica. Laboratorio de Genetica Evolutiva y Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Humanidades y Cs.sociales. Departamento de Genetica. Laboratorio de Genetica Evolutiva y Molecular; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is almost universal in animals. Rensch?s rule proposes that SSD increases with increasing average body size in taxa where males are larger than females (male- biased SSD; MBSSD) and decreases when females are larger (femalebiased SSD; FBSSD). Although it was proposed thatboth patterns are part of the same evolutionary trend, there is more evidence for Rensch?s rule in the first case. We analyzed SSD in the acridid subfamily Melanoplinae ina sample of 718 species and subspecies covering all tribes and representative genera. As in all Orthopera, SSD is female-biased. Body length was used as a proxy for body size. Mean body size within the subfamily varied between 9 and 34.5 mm in males (N= 812) and 12.75 and 44.0 mm in females (N= 735). Except for five species (0.7%) all taxa (from subfamily to subspecies) showed moderate to strong FBSSD (mean= 1.27). The lowest SSD was observed in Melanoplus chumash(SSD= 1.01), and the highest in Phaedrotettix aptera coquinae(SSD= 1.83). To test Rensch?s rule we performed reduced major axis (RMA) regressions between log10 (male body length) and log10 (female body length). In no case RMA slopes were significantly higher than 1.0 which would signal Rensch?s rule. Thus, Melanoplinae representsa new case of FBSSD where Rensch?s rule is not verified. The proximatecauses of FBSSD and the non-occurrence of Rensch?s rule in the Orthoptera are discussed as well as the relationship between SSD patterns at the intra- and supraspecific levels.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/8551
Bidau, Claudio Juan; Marti, Dardo Andrea; Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel; Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae); Insect Biodiversity Research Group; Journal of Insect Biodiversity; 1; 12; 12-2013; 1-14
2147-7612
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/8551
identifier_str_mv Bidau, Claudio Juan; Marti, Dardo Andrea; Castillo, Elio Rodrigo Daniel; Rensch's rule is not verifiedin melanopline grasshoppers (Acrididae); Insect Biodiversity Research Group; Journal of Insect Biodiversity; 1; 12; 12-2013; 1-14
2147-7612
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.insectbiodiversity.org/index.php/jib/article/view/28/pdf_13
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12976/jib/2013.1.12
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Insect Biodiversity Research Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Insect Biodiversity Research Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980832087638016
score 12.993085