Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas

Autores
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Zobeck, Ted M.
Año de publicación
2008
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Wind erosion is an important soil degradation process in the semi-arid Pampas of Argentina, but no attempts have been made to predict the process in this region. One limitation for the use of event-based wind erosion prediction models is the lack of reliable climatic data to initiate these models. As an effort to apply wind erosion models, we compared field wind erosion measurements carried out during 4 years in a bare soil reference plot (RP) and during 3 years in the same soil with different tillage conditions: conventional (CT) and no-till (NT). Wind erosion was predicted with: (1) subroutines for single storm event versions of the wind erosion prediction system (WEPS) and the revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ), for which the climatic data of each single storm were used, and (2) the wind erosion equation (WEQ) for full rotation periods, for which long-term climatic records (1961-2004) were used. Wind erosion field measurements were carried out with BSNE samplers in 1-ha plots. Regression of predicted soil erosion rates from WEPS (y = 0·5192x + 0·0589, R2 = 0·89) and RWEQ (y = 0·5691x - 7·071, R2 = 0·90) predictions with field measurements of soil erosion rates obtained in RP (54·51 kg m-1 on average) were highly significant, but both models underestimated wind erosion by 40-45 percent. Predictions of wind erosion made with RWEQ were highly sensitive to variations in the soil crusting factor (SCF), varying from 60·5 t m-1 when predictions for a single storm were made using the SCF default data to 0·699 t m-1 when SCF was deduced from visual field observations. The WEQ predictions agreed adequately with measured erosion for 16 rotation periods either when using a climatic C factor value of 92, corresponding to the 1961-2004 period (y=0·9422x - 1·9248, R2=0·96) or a C factor value of 80, corresponding to the moister 1985-2004 period (y=0·7612x - 1·5543, R2=0·96). Neither WEPS nor RWEQ predicted the low amounts measured in CT and NT (3·86 kg m-1 on average) for storms lasting approximately 24 hours. High plant or residue soil coverage as well as high oriented surface roughness eliminated erosion according to WEPS and RWEQ. These results indicated that WEQ can be used as a reliable prediction model for long-term predictions of wind erosion in the semi-arid Pampas, even when run with limited available climatic data for this region.
Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina
Fil: Zobeck, Ted M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Research Service; Estados Unidos
Materia
Erosion Prediction Models
Semiarid Regions
Wind Erosion
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81724

id CONICETDig_7ea419ea2b442768f95a5787668217f2
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81724
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean PampasBuschiazzo, Daniel EduardoZobeck, Ted M.Erosion Prediction ModelsSemiarid RegionsWind Erosionhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Wind erosion is an important soil degradation process in the semi-arid Pampas of Argentina, but no attempts have been made to predict the process in this region. One limitation for the use of event-based wind erosion prediction models is the lack of reliable climatic data to initiate these models. As an effort to apply wind erosion models, we compared field wind erosion measurements carried out during 4 years in a bare soil reference plot (RP) and during 3 years in the same soil with different tillage conditions: conventional (CT) and no-till (NT). Wind erosion was predicted with: (1) subroutines for single storm event versions of the wind erosion prediction system (WEPS) and the revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ), for which the climatic data of each single storm were used, and (2) the wind erosion equation (WEQ) for full rotation periods, for which long-term climatic records (1961-2004) were used. Wind erosion field measurements were carried out with BSNE samplers in 1-ha plots. Regression of predicted soil erosion rates from WEPS (y = 0·5192x + 0·0589, R2 = 0·89) and RWEQ (y = 0·5691x - 7·071, R2 = 0·90) predictions with field measurements of soil erosion rates obtained in RP (54·51 kg m-1 on average) were highly significant, but both models underestimated wind erosion by 40-45 percent. Predictions of wind erosion made with RWEQ were highly sensitive to variations in the soil crusting factor (SCF), varying from 60·5 t m-1 when predictions for a single storm were made using the SCF default data to 0·699 t m-1 when SCF was deduced from visual field observations. The WEQ predictions agreed adequately with measured erosion for 16 rotation periods either when using a climatic C factor value of 92, corresponding to the 1961-2004 period (y=0·9422x - 1·9248, R2=0·96) or a C factor value of 80, corresponding to the moister 1985-2004 period (y=0·7612x - 1·5543, R2=0·96). Neither WEPS nor RWEQ predicted the low amounts measured in CT and NT (3·86 kg m-1 on average) for storms lasting approximately 24 hours. High plant or residue soil coverage as well as high oriented surface roughness eliminated erosion according to WEPS and RWEQ. These results indicated that WEQ can be used as a reliable prediction model for long-term predictions of wind erosion in the semi-arid Pampas, even when run with limited available climatic data for this region.Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; ArgentinaFil: Zobeck, Ted M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Research Service; Estados UnidosJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd2008-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/81724Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Zobeck, Ted M.; Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Earth Surface Processes And Landforms; 33; 12; 10-2008; 1839-18500197-9337CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/esp.1738info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/esp.1738info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:04Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/81724instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:04.85CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
title Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
spellingShingle Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
Erosion Prediction Models
Semiarid Regions
Wind Erosion
title_short Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
title_full Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
title_fullStr Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
title_full_unstemmed Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
title_sort Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
Zobeck, Ted M.
author Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
author_facet Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo
Zobeck, Ted M.
author_role author
author2 Zobeck, Ted M.
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Erosion Prediction Models
Semiarid Regions
Wind Erosion
topic Erosion Prediction Models
Semiarid Regions
Wind Erosion
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Wind erosion is an important soil degradation process in the semi-arid Pampas of Argentina, but no attempts have been made to predict the process in this region. One limitation for the use of event-based wind erosion prediction models is the lack of reliable climatic data to initiate these models. As an effort to apply wind erosion models, we compared field wind erosion measurements carried out during 4 years in a bare soil reference plot (RP) and during 3 years in the same soil with different tillage conditions: conventional (CT) and no-till (NT). Wind erosion was predicted with: (1) subroutines for single storm event versions of the wind erosion prediction system (WEPS) and the revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ), for which the climatic data of each single storm were used, and (2) the wind erosion equation (WEQ) for full rotation periods, for which long-term climatic records (1961-2004) were used. Wind erosion field measurements were carried out with BSNE samplers in 1-ha plots. Regression of predicted soil erosion rates from WEPS (y = 0·5192x + 0·0589, R2 = 0·89) and RWEQ (y = 0·5691x - 7·071, R2 = 0·90) predictions with field measurements of soil erosion rates obtained in RP (54·51 kg m-1 on average) were highly significant, but both models underestimated wind erosion by 40-45 percent. Predictions of wind erosion made with RWEQ were highly sensitive to variations in the soil crusting factor (SCF), varying from 60·5 t m-1 when predictions for a single storm were made using the SCF default data to 0·699 t m-1 when SCF was deduced from visual field observations. The WEQ predictions agreed adequately with measured erosion for 16 rotation periods either when using a climatic C factor value of 92, corresponding to the 1961-2004 period (y=0·9422x - 1·9248, R2=0·96) or a C factor value of 80, corresponding to the moister 1985-2004 period (y=0·7612x - 1·5543, R2=0·96). Neither WEPS nor RWEQ predicted the low amounts measured in CT and NT (3·86 kg m-1 on average) for storms lasting approximately 24 hours. High plant or residue soil coverage as well as high oriented surface roughness eliminated erosion according to WEPS and RWEQ. These results indicated that WEQ can be used as a reliable prediction model for long-term predictions of wind erosion in the semi-arid Pampas, even when run with limited available climatic data for this region.
Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional La Pampa-San Luis. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina
Fil: Zobeck, Ted M.. United States Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Research Service; Estados Unidos
description Wind erosion is an important soil degradation process in the semi-arid Pampas of Argentina, but no attempts have been made to predict the process in this region. One limitation for the use of event-based wind erosion prediction models is the lack of reliable climatic data to initiate these models. As an effort to apply wind erosion models, we compared field wind erosion measurements carried out during 4 years in a bare soil reference plot (RP) and during 3 years in the same soil with different tillage conditions: conventional (CT) and no-till (NT). Wind erosion was predicted with: (1) subroutines for single storm event versions of the wind erosion prediction system (WEPS) and the revised wind erosion equation (RWEQ), for which the climatic data of each single storm were used, and (2) the wind erosion equation (WEQ) for full rotation periods, for which long-term climatic records (1961-2004) were used. Wind erosion field measurements were carried out with BSNE samplers in 1-ha plots. Regression of predicted soil erosion rates from WEPS (y = 0·5192x + 0·0589, R2 = 0·89) and RWEQ (y = 0·5691x - 7·071, R2 = 0·90) predictions with field measurements of soil erosion rates obtained in RP (54·51 kg m-1 on average) were highly significant, but both models underestimated wind erosion by 40-45 percent. Predictions of wind erosion made with RWEQ were highly sensitive to variations in the soil crusting factor (SCF), varying from 60·5 t m-1 when predictions for a single storm were made using the SCF default data to 0·699 t m-1 when SCF was deduced from visual field observations. The WEQ predictions agreed adequately with measured erosion for 16 rotation periods either when using a climatic C factor value of 92, corresponding to the 1961-2004 period (y=0·9422x - 1·9248, R2=0·96) or a C factor value of 80, corresponding to the moister 1985-2004 period (y=0·7612x - 1·5543, R2=0·96). Neither WEPS nor RWEQ predicted the low amounts measured in CT and NT (3·86 kg m-1 on average) for storms lasting approximately 24 hours. High plant or residue soil coverage as well as high oriented surface roughness eliminated erosion according to WEPS and RWEQ. These results indicated that WEQ can be used as a reliable prediction model for long-term predictions of wind erosion in the semi-arid Pampas, even when run with limited available climatic data for this region.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81724
Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Zobeck, Ted M.; Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Earth Surface Processes And Landforms; 33; 12; 10-2008; 1839-1850
0197-9337
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/81724
identifier_str_mv Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; Zobeck, Ted M.; Validation of WEQ, RWEQ and WEPS wind erosion for different arable land management systems in the Argentinean Pampas; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Earth Surface Processes And Landforms; 33; 12; 10-2008; 1839-1850
0197-9337
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/esp.1738
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/esp.1738
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269199678832640
score 13.13397