Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys
- Autores
- Leauthaud, A.; Amon, A.; Singh, S.; Gruen, D.; Lange, J. U.; Huang, S.; Robertson, N. C.; Varga, T.N.; Luo, Y.; Heymans, C.; Hildebrandt, H.; Blake, C.; Aguena, M.; Allam, S.; Andrade Oliveira, F.; Annis, J.; Bertin, E.; Bhargava, S.; Blazek, J.; Bridle, S. L.; Brooks, D.; Burke, D. L.; Rosell, A. Carnero; Kind, M. Carrasco; Carretero, J.; Makler, Martín; Troxel, M. A.; Van Waerbeke, L.; Vielzeuf, P.; Wright, A. H.
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Lensing without borders is a cross-survey collaboration created to assess the consistency of galaxy-galaxy lensing signals (Δς) across different data sets and to carry out end-to-end tests of systematic errors. We perform a blind comparison of the amplitude of Δς using lens samples from BOSS and six independent lensing surveys. We find good agreement between empirically estimated and reported systematic errors which agree to better than 2.3σ in four lens bins and three radial ranges. For lenses with zL > 0.43 and considering statistical errors, we detect a 3-4σ correlation between lensing amplitude and survey depth. This correlation could arise from the increasing impact at higher redshift of unrecognized galaxy blends on shear calibration and imperfections in photometric redshift calibration. At zL > 0.54, amplitudes may additionally correlate with foreground stellar density. The amplitude of these trends is within survey-defined systematic error budgets that are designed to include known shear and redshift calibration uncertainty. Using a fully empirical and conservative method, we do not find evidence for large unknown systematics. Systematic errors greater than 15 per cent (25 per cent) ruled out in three lens bins at 68 per cent (95 per cent) confidence at z < 0.54. Differences with respect to predictions based on clustering are observed to be at the 20-30 per cent level. Our results therefore suggest that lensing systematics alone are unlikely to fully explain the 'lensing is low' effect at z < 0.54. This analysis demonstrates the power of cross-survey comparisons and provides a promising path for identifying and reducing systematics in future lensing analyses.
Fil: Leauthaud, A.. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Amon, A.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Singh, S.. University of Carnegie Mellon; Estados Unidos. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gruen, D.. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lange, J. U.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Huang, S.. University of Princeton; Estados Unidos
Fil: Robertson, N. C.. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos
Fil: Varga, T.N.. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. Institut Max Planck fuer Gesellschaft. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics; Alemania
Fil: Luo, Y.. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Heymans, C.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Hildebrandt, H.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania
Fil: Blake, C.. Swinburne University Of Technology; Australia
Fil: Aguena, M.. Laboratoire D'annecy-le-vieux de Physique Des Particules Lapp; Francia. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil
Fil: Allam, S.. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Andrade Oliveira, F.. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho; Brasil
Fil: Annis, J.. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bertin, E.. Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Francia. Institut D’astrophysique de Paris; Francia
Fil: Bhargava, S.. Université Paris-saclay; Francia
Fil: Blazek, J.. University Northeastern; Estados Unidos. Northeastern University; Estados Unidos. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne; Francia
Fil: Bridle, S. L.. University of Manchester; Reino Unido
Fil: Brooks, D.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Burke, D. L.. Slac National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Rosell, A. Carnero. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil. Instituto Astrofisico de Canarias; España. Universidad de La Laguna; España
Fil: Kind, M. Carrasco. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos
Fil: Carretero, J.. Institut de Física D'altes Energies; España
Fil: Makler, Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias Físicas. - Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Ciencias Físicas; Argentina. Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas; Brasil
Fil: Troxel, M. A.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos
Fil: Van Waerbeke, L.. University of British Columbia; Canadá
Fil: Vielzeuf, P.. Institut de Física D'altes Energies; España
Fil: Wright, A. H.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania - Materia
-
COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS
LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/215583
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_7d9dccd6bac6e816b2e886f87718d4fd |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/215583 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveysLeauthaud, A.Amon, A.Singh, S.Gruen, D.Lange, J. U.Huang, S.Robertson, N. C.Varga, T.N.Luo, Y.Heymans, C.Hildebrandt, H.Blake, C.Aguena, M.Allam, S.Andrade Oliveira, F.Annis, J.Bertin, E.Bhargava, S.Blazek, J.Bridle, S. L.Brooks, D.Burke, D. L.Rosell, A. CarneroKind, M. CarrascoCarretero, J.Makler, MartínTroxel, M. A.Van Waerbeke, L.Vielzeuf, P.Wright, A. H.COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONSLARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Lensing without borders is a cross-survey collaboration created to assess the consistency of galaxy-galaxy lensing signals (Δς) across different data sets and to carry out end-to-end tests of systematic errors. We perform a blind comparison of the amplitude of Δς using lens samples from BOSS and six independent lensing surveys. We find good agreement between empirically estimated and reported systematic errors which agree to better than 2.3σ in four lens bins and three radial ranges. For lenses with zL > 0.43 and considering statistical errors, we detect a 3-4σ correlation between lensing amplitude and survey depth. This correlation could arise from the increasing impact at higher redshift of unrecognized galaxy blends on shear calibration and imperfections in photometric redshift calibration. At zL > 0.54, amplitudes may additionally correlate with foreground stellar density. The amplitude of these trends is within survey-defined systematic error budgets that are designed to include known shear and redshift calibration uncertainty. Using a fully empirical and conservative method, we do not find evidence for large unknown systematics. Systematic errors greater than 15 per cent (25 per cent) ruled out in three lens bins at 68 per cent (95 per cent) confidence at z < 0.54. Differences with respect to predictions based on clustering are observed to be at the 20-30 per cent level. Our results therefore suggest that lensing systematics alone are unlikely to fully explain the 'lensing is low' effect at z < 0.54. This analysis demonstrates the power of cross-survey comparisons and provides a promising path for identifying and reducing systematics in future lensing analyses.Fil: Leauthaud, A.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Amon, A.. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Singh, S.. University of Carnegie Mellon; Estados Unidos. University of California at Berkeley; Estados UnidosFil: Gruen, D.. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Lange, J. U.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Huang, S.. University of Princeton; Estados UnidosFil: Robertson, N. C.. University of Cambridge; Estados UnidosFil: Varga, T.N.. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. Institut Max Planck fuer Gesellschaft. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics; AlemaniaFil: Luo, Y.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Heymans, C.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania. University of Edinburgh; Reino UnidoFil: Hildebrandt, H.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; AlemaniaFil: Blake, C.. Swinburne University Of Technology; AustraliaFil: Aguena, M.. Laboratoire D'annecy-le-vieux de Physique Des Particules Lapp; Francia. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; BrasilFil: Allam, S.. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Andrade Oliveira, F.. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho; BrasilFil: Annis, J.. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Bertin, E.. Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Francia. Institut D’astrophysique de Paris; FranciaFil: Bhargava, S.. Université Paris-saclay; FranciaFil: Blazek, J.. University Northeastern; Estados Unidos. Northeastern University; Estados Unidos. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne; FranciaFil: Bridle, S. L.. University of Manchester; Reino UnidoFil: Brooks, D.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Burke, D. L.. Slac National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Rosell, A. Carnero. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil. Instituto Astrofisico de Canarias; España. Universidad de La Laguna; EspañaFil: Kind, M. Carrasco. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados UnidosFil: Carretero, J.. Institut de Física D'altes Energies; EspañaFil: Makler, Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias Físicas. - Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Ciencias Físicas; Argentina. Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas; BrasilFil: Troxel, M. A.. University of Duke; Estados UnidosFil: Van Waerbeke, L.. University of British Columbia; CanadáFil: Vielzeuf, P.. Institut de Física D'altes Energies; EspañaFil: Wright, A. H.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; AlemaniaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2022-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/215583Leauthaud, A.; Amon, A.; Singh, S.; Gruen, D.; Lange, J. U.; et al.; Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 510; 4; 3-2022; 6150-61890035-8711CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stab3586info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/510/4/6150/6461104info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:08:10Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/215583instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:08:11.201CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys |
| title |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys |
| spellingShingle |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys Leauthaud, A. COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE |
| title_short |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys |
| title_full |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys |
| title_fullStr |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys |
| title_sort |
Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Leauthaud, A. Amon, A. Singh, S. Gruen, D. Lange, J. U. Huang, S. Robertson, N. C. Varga, T.N. Luo, Y. Heymans, C. Hildebrandt, H. Blake, C. Aguena, M. Allam, S. Andrade Oliveira, F. Annis, J. Bertin, E. Bhargava, S. Blazek, J. Bridle, S. L. Brooks, D. Burke, D. L. Rosell, A. Carnero Kind, M. Carrasco Carretero, J. Makler, Martín Troxel, M. A. Van Waerbeke, L. Vielzeuf, P. Wright, A. H. |
| author |
Leauthaud, A. |
| author_facet |
Leauthaud, A. Amon, A. Singh, S. Gruen, D. Lange, J. U. Huang, S. Robertson, N. C. Varga, T.N. Luo, Y. Heymans, C. Hildebrandt, H. Blake, C. Aguena, M. Allam, S. Andrade Oliveira, F. Annis, J. Bertin, E. Bhargava, S. Blazek, J. Bridle, S. L. Brooks, D. Burke, D. L. Rosell, A. Carnero Kind, M. Carrasco Carretero, J. Makler, Martín Troxel, M. A. Van Waerbeke, L. Vielzeuf, P. Wright, A. H. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Amon, A. Singh, S. Gruen, D. Lange, J. U. Huang, S. Robertson, N. C. Varga, T.N. Luo, Y. Heymans, C. Hildebrandt, H. Blake, C. Aguena, M. Allam, S. Andrade Oliveira, F. Annis, J. Bertin, E. Bhargava, S. Blazek, J. Bridle, S. L. Brooks, D. Burke, D. L. Rosell, A. Carnero Kind, M. Carrasco Carretero, J. Makler, Martín Troxel, M. A. Van Waerbeke, L. Vielzeuf, P. Wright, A. H. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE |
| topic |
COSMOLOGY: OBSERVATIONS LARGE-SCALE STRUCTURE OF UNIVERSE |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Lensing without borders is a cross-survey collaboration created to assess the consistency of galaxy-galaxy lensing signals (Δς) across different data sets and to carry out end-to-end tests of systematic errors. We perform a blind comparison of the amplitude of Δς using lens samples from BOSS and six independent lensing surveys. We find good agreement between empirically estimated and reported systematic errors which agree to better than 2.3σ in four lens bins and three radial ranges. For lenses with zL > 0.43 and considering statistical errors, we detect a 3-4σ correlation between lensing amplitude and survey depth. This correlation could arise from the increasing impact at higher redshift of unrecognized galaxy blends on shear calibration and imperfections in photometric redshift calibration. At zL > 0.54, amplitudes may additionally correlate with foreground stellar density. The amplitude of these trends is within survey-defined systematic error budgets that are designed to include known shear and redshift calibration uncertainty. Using a fully empirical and conservative method, we do not find evidence for large unknown systematics. Systematic errors greater than 15 per cent (25 per cent) ruled out in three lens bins at 68 per cent (95 per cent) confidence at z < 0.54. Differences with respect to predictions based on clustering are observed to be at the 20-30 per cent level. Our results therefore suggest that lensing systematics alone are unlikely to fully explain the 'lensing is low' effect at z < 0.54. This analysis demonstrates the power of cross-survey comparisons and provides a promising path for identifying and reducing systematics in future lensing analyses. Fil: Leauthaud, A.. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Amon, A.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Singh, S.. University of Carnegie Mellon; Estados Unidos. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos Fil: Gruen, D.. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Lange, J. U.. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Huang, S.. University of Princeton; Estados Unidos Fil: Robertson, N. C.. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos Fil: Varga, T.N.. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania. Institut Max Planck fuer Gesellschaft. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics; Alemania Fil: Luo, Y.. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Heymans, C.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido Fil: Hildebrandt, H.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania Fil: Blake, C.. Swinburne University Of Technology; Australia Fil: Aguena, M.. Laboratoire D'annecy-le-vieux de Physique Des Particules Lapp; Francia. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil Fil: Allam, S.. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados Unidos Fil: Andrade Oliveira, F.. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil. Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho; Brasil Fil: Annis, J.. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados Unidos Fil: Bertin, E.. Université Pierre et Marie Curie; Francia. Institut D’astrophysique de Paris; Francia Fil: Bhargava, S.. Université Paris-saclay; Francia Fil: Blazek, J.. University Northeastern; Estados Unidos. Northeastern University; Estados Unidos. Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne; Francia Fil: Bridle, S. L.. University of Manchester; Reino Unido Fil: Brooks, D.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido Fil: Burke, D. L.. Slac National Accelerator Laboratory; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Rosell, A. Carnero. Laboratório Interinstitucional de E-astronomia; Brasil. Instituto Astrofisico de Canarias; España. Universidad de La Laguna; España Fil: Kind, M. Carrasco. University of Illinois. Urbana - Champaign; Estados Unidos Fil: Carretero, J.. Institut de Física D'altes Energies; España Fil: Makler, Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ciencias Físicas. - Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Ciencias Físicas; Argentina. Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas; Brasil Fil: Troxel, M. A.. University of Duke; Estados Unidos Fil: Van Waerbeke, L.. University of British Columbia; Canadá Fil: Vielzeuf, P.. Institut de Física D'altes Energies; España Fil: Wright, A. H.. Ruhr Universität Bochum; Alemania |
| description |
Lensing without borders is a cross-survey collaboration created to assess the consistency of galaxy-galaxy lensing signals (Δς) across different data sets and to carry out end-to-end tests of systematic errors. We perform a blind comparison of the amplitude of Δς using lens samples from BOSS and six independent lensing surveys. We find good agreement between empirically estimated and reported systematic errors which agree to better than 2.3σ in four lens bins and three radial ranges. For lenses with zL > 0.43 and considering statistical errors, we detect a 3-4σ correlation between lensing amplitude and survey depth. This correlation could arise from the increasing impact at higher redshift of unrecognized galaxy blends on shear calibration and imperfections in photometric redshift calibration. At zL > 0.54, amplitudes may additionally correlate with foreground stellar density. The amplitude of these trends is within survey-defined systematic error budgets that are designed to include known shear and redshift calibration uncertainty. Using a fully empirical and conservative method, we do not find evidence for large unknown systematics. Systematic errors greater than 15 per cent (25 per cent) ruled out in three lens bins at 68 per cent (95 per cent) confidence at z < 0.54. Differences with respect to predictions based on clustering are observed to be at the 20-30 per cent level. Our results therefore suggest that lensing systematics alone are unlikely to fully explain the 'lensing is low' effect at z < 0.54. This analysis demonstrates the power of cross-survey comparisons and provides a promising path for identifying and reducing systematics in future lensing analyses. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/215583 Leauthaud, A.; Amon, A.; Singh, S.; Gruen, D.; Lange, J. U.; et al.; Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 510; 4; 3-2022; 6150-6189 0035-8711 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/215583 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Leauthaud, A.; Amon, A.; Singh, S.; Gruen, D.; Lange, J. U.; et al.; Lensing without borders - I. A blind comparison of the amplitude of galaxy-galaxy lensing between independent imaging surveys; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 510; 4; 3-2022; 6150-6189 0035-8711 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stab3586 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/510/4/6150/6461104 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1842270034620055552 |
| score |
12.885934 |