Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina
- Autores
- Beigel, Maria Fernanda; Almeida, Ana María; Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo; Digiampietri, Luciano; Gomez, Maria Soledad; Candido, Marcia Rangel; Ciriza, Alejandra Graciela; Rossomando Ramirez, María Pía; Moschkovich, Marília; Pecheny, Mario Martín
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Despite their relatively similar national contexts, geographical proximity, and comparable historical and cultural experiences, Brazil and Argentina show relevant differences in terms of R&D systems, research assessment procedures and the morphology of their academic elites. However, they share similar paths of integration to the international academic arena, along with the prevalence of nationally oriented groups under a primarily public funding system. Diverse combinations of intersectional inequalities can be found when analyzing two concrete populations of researchers from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), given that we are dealing with highly internationalized academic elites. In this paper, we describe the two national fields and the target populations in terms of age, position, and institutional affiliation. Considering the different composition by sex of these two populations we observe meaningful analogies regarding publication and, especially, publication in English. Finally, we discuss author positions, showing how intersectional inequalities affect women, relating this general picture to citation impact in Google Scholar and describing how gender territories are built among the top cited researchers.
Malgré leurs contextes nationaux relativement similaires, leur proximité géographique et leurs expériences historiques et culturelles comparables, le Brésil et l'Argentine présentent des différences notables en termes de systèmes de Recherche & Développement, de procédures d'évaluation de la recherche et de morphologie de leurs élites universitaires. Cependant, ils partagent des voies similaires d'intégration dans l'arène universitaire internationale, ainsi que la prédominance de groupes à vocation nationale dans le cadre d'un système de financement essentiellement public. L'analyse de deux populations concrètes de chercheurs du Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) et du Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) révèle des combinaisons d'inégalités intersectionnelles distinctes, bien qu'il s'agisse d'élites universitaires fortement internationalisées. Dans cet article, nous décrivons les deux champs nationaux et les populations cibles en termes d'âge, de position et d'affiliation institutionnelle. Compte tenu de la composition différente de ces deux populations en termes de genre, nous observons des analogies significatives en ce qui concerne la publication et, en particulier, la publication en anglais. Enfin, nous discutons des positions des auteurs, en montrant comment les inégalités intersectionnelles affectent les femmes, en reliant cette image générale à l'impact des citations dans Google Scholar et en décrivant comment les territoires de genre sont construits parmi les chercheurs les plus cités.
Fil: Beigel, Maria Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina
Fil: Almeida, Ana María. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil
Fil: Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales; Argentina
Fil: Digiampietri, Luciano. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Gomez, Maria Soledad. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales; Argentina
Fil: Candido, Marcia Rangel. Universidade de Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil
Fil: Ciriza, Alejandra Graciela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina
Fil: Rossomando Ramirez, María Pía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Socioeconómicas; Argentina
Fil: Moschkovich, Marília. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Pecheny, Mario Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
BRAZIL
ARGENTINA
GENDER ASYMMETRIES
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING
NATIONAL DATE SOURCE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/248467
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_7aceee9e304ae62d3dbb94844a45b0f3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/248467 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and ArgentinaProduction scientifique et inégalités de genre parmi deux élites universitaires: le cas du Brésil et de l'ArgentineBeigel, Maria FernandaAlmeida, Ana MaríaGallardo, Jorge OsvaldoDigiampietri, LucianoGomez, Maria SoledadCandido, Marcia RangelCiriza, Alejandra GracielaRossomando Ramirez, María PíaMoschkovich, MaríliaPecheny, Mario MartínBRAZILARGENTINAGENDER ASYMMETRIESACADEMIC PUBLISHINGNATIONAL DATE SOURCEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Despite their relatively similar national contexts, geographical proximity, and comparable historical and cultural experiences, Brazil and Argentina show relevant differences in terms of R&D systems, research assessment procedures and the morphology of their academic elites. However, they share similar paths of integration to the international academic arena, along with the prevalence of nationally oriented groups under a primarily public funding system. Diverse combinations of intersectional inequalities can be found when analyzing two concrete populations of researchers from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), given that we are dealing with highly internationalized academic elites. In this paper, we describe the two national fields and the target populations in terms of age, position, and institutional affiliation. Considering the different composition by sex of these two populations we observe meaningful analogies regarding publication and, especially, publication in English. Finally, we discuss author positions, showing how intersectional inequalities affect women, relating this general picture to citation impact in Google Scholar and describing how gender territories are built among the top cited researchers.Malgré leurs contextes nationaux relativement similaires, leur proximité géographique et leurs expériences historiques et culturelles comparables, le Brésil et l'Argentine présentent des différences notables en termes de systèmes de Recherche & Développement, de procédures d'évaluation de la recherche et de morphologie de leurs élites universitaires. Cependant, ils partagent des voies similaires d'intégration dans l'arène universitaire internationale, ainsi que la prédominance de groupes à vocation nationale dans le cadre d'un système de financement essentiellement public. L'analyse de deux populations concrètes de chercheurs du Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) et du Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) révèle des combinaisons d'inégalités intersectionnelles distinctes, bien qu'il s'agisse d'élites universitaires fortement internationalisées. Dans cet article, nous décrivons les deux champs nationaux et les populations cibles en termes d'âge, de position et d'affiliation institutionnelle. Compte tenu de la composition différente de ces deux populations en termes de genre, nous observons des analogies significatives en ce qui concerne la publication et, en particulier, la publication en anglais. Enfin, nous discutons des positions des auteurs, en montrant comment les inégalités intersectionnelles affectent les femmes, en reliant cette image générale à l'impact des citations dans Google Scholar et en décrivant comment les territoires de genre sont construits parmi les chercheurs les plus cités.Fil: Beigel, Maria Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; ArgentinaFil: Almeida, Ana María. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; BrasilFil: Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales; ArgentinaFil: Digiampietri, Luciano. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Gomez, Maria Soledad. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales; ArgentinaFil: Candido, Marcia Rangel. Universidade de Estado do Rio de Janeiro; BrasilFil: Ciriza, Alejandra Graciela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; ArgentinaFil: Rossomando Ramirez, María Pía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Socioeconómicas; ArgentinaFil: Moschkovich, Marília. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Pecheny, Mario Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaÉditions de la Sorbonne2023-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/248467Beigel, Maria Fernanda; Almeida, Ana María; Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo; Digiampietri, Luciano; Gomez, Maria Soledad; et al.; Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina; Éditions de la Sorbonne; Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines; 42; 7-2023; 255-2801963-1022CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/rhsh/8374info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/rhsh.8374info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:11:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/248467instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:11:38.94CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina Production scientifique et inégalités de genre parmi deux élites universitaires: le cas du Brésil et de l'Argentine |
| title |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina |
| spellingShingle |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina Beigel, Maria Fernanda BRAZIL ARGENTINA GENDER ASYMMETRIES ACADEMIC PUBLISHING NATIONAL DATE SOURCE |
| title_short |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina |
| title_full |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina |
| title_fullStr |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina |
| title_sort |
Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Beigel, Maria Fernanda Almeida, Ana María Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo Digiampietri, Luciano Gomez, Maria Soledad Candido, Marcia Rangel Ciriza, Alejandra Graciela Rossomando Ramirez, María Pía Moschkovich, Marília Pecheny, Mario Martín |
| author |
Beigel, Maria Fernanda |
| author_facet |
Beigel, Maria Fernanda Almeida, Ana María Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo Digiampietri, Luciano Gomez, Maria Soledad Candido, Marcia Rangel Ciriza, Alejandra Graciela Rossomando Ramirez, María Pía Moschkovich, Marília Pecheny, Mario Martín |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Almeida, Ana María Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo Digiampietri, Luciano Gomez, Maria Soledad Candido, Marcia Rangel Ciriza, Alejandra Graciela Rossomando Ramirez, María Pía Moschkovich, Marília Pecheny, Mario Martín |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BRAZIL ARGENTINA GENDER ASYMMETRIES ACADEMIC PUBLISHING NATIONAL DATE SOURCE |
| topic |
BRAZIL ARGENTINA GENDER ASYMMETRIES ACADEMIC PUBLISHING NATIONAL DATE SOURCE |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Despite their relatively similar national contexts, geographical proximity, and comparable historical and cultural experiences, Brazil and Argentina show relevant differences in terms of R&D systems, research assessment procedures and the morphology of their academic elites. However, they share similar paths of integration to the international academic arena, along with the prevalence of nationally oriented groups under a primarily public funding system. Diverse combinations of intersectional inequalities can be found when analyzing two concrete populations of researchers from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), given that we are dealing with highly internationalized academic elites. In this paper, we describe the two national fields and the target populations in terms of age, position, and institutional affiliation. Considering the different composition by sex of these two populations we observe meaningful analogies regarding publication and, especially, publication in English. Finally, we discuss author positions, showing how intersectional inequalities affect women, relating this general picture to citation impact in Google Scholar and describing how gender territories are built among the top cited researchers. Malgré leurs contextes nationaux relativement similaires, leur proximité géographique et leurs expériences historiques et culturelles comparables, le Brésil et l'Argentine présentent des différences notables en termes de systèmes de Recherche & Développement, de procédures d'évaluation de la recherche et de morphologie de leurs élites universitaires. Cependant, ils partagent des voies similaires d'intégration dans l'arène universitaire internationale, ainsi que la prédominance de groupes à vocation nationale dans le cadre d'un système de financement essentiellement public. L'analyse de deux populations concrètes de chercheurs du Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) et du Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) révèle des combinaisons d'inégalités intersectionnelles distinctes, bien qu'il s'agisse d'élites universitaires fortement internationalisées. Dans cet article, nous décrivons les deux champs nationaux et les populations cibles en termes d'âge, de position et d'affiliation institutionnelle. Compte tenu de la composition différente de ces deux populations en termes de genre, nous observons des analogies significatives en ce qui concerne la publication et, en particulier, la publication en anglais. Enfin, nous discutons des positions des auteurs, en montrant comment les inégalités intersectionnelles affectent les femmes, en reliant cette image générale à l'impact des citations dans Google Scholar et en décrivant comment les territoires de genre sont construits parmi les chercheurs les plus cités. Fil: Beigel, Maria Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina Fil: Almeida, Ana María. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil Fil: Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales; Argentina Fil: Digiampietri, Luciano. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil Fil: Gomez, Maria Soledad. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales; Argentina Fil: Candido, Marcia Rangel. Universidade de Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Brasil Fil: Ciriza, Alejandra Graciela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina Fil: Rossomando Ramirez, María Pía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Juan. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones Socioeconómicas; Argentina Fil: Moschkovich, Marília. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil Fil: Pecheny, Mario Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
| description |
Despite their relatively similar national contexts, geographical proximity, and comparable historical and cultural experiences, Brazil and Argentina show relevant differences in terms of R&D systems, research assessment procedures and the morphology of their academic elites. However, they share similar paths of integration to the international academic arena, along with the prevalence of nationally oriented groups under a primarily public funding system. Diverse combinations of intersectional inequalities can be found when analyzing two concrete populations of researchers from the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), given that we are dealing with highly internationalized academic elites. In this paper, we describe the two national fields and the target populations in terms of age, position, and institutional affiliation. Considering the different composition by sex of these two populations we observe meaningful analogies regarding publication and, especially, publication in English. Finally, we discuss author positions, showing how intersectional inequalities affect women, relating this general picture to citation impact in Google Scholar and describing how gender territories are built among the top cited researchers. |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/248467 Beigel, Maria Fernanda; Almeida, Ana María; Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo; Digiampietri, Luciano; Gomez, Maria Soledad; et al.; Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina; Éditions de la Sorbonne; Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines; 42; 7-2023; 255-280 1963-1022 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/248467 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Beigel, Maria Fernanda; Almeida, Ana María; Gallardo, Jorge Osvaldo; Digiampietri, Luciano; Gomez, Maria Soledad; et al.; Scientific Production and Gender Inequalities in Two Academic Elites: Brazil and Argentina; Éditions de la Sorbonne; Revue d'histoire des sciences humaines; 42; 7-2023; 255-280 1963-1022 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/rhsh/8374 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/rhsh.8374 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Éditions de la Sorbonne |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Éditions de la Sorbonne |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1846781497299697664 |
| score |
12.982451 |