Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
- Autores
- Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; Link, Jason S.; Martell, Steven J. D.; Parma, Ana Maria; Smith, Anthony D. M.
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations.
Fil: Melnychuk, Michael C.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Essington, Timothy E.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Trevor, Branch A.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Heppell, Selina S.. Oregon State Universit; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jensen, Olaf P.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Link, Jason S.. Northeast Fisheries Science Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Martell, Steven J. D.. International Pacific Halibut Commission; Estados Unidos
Fil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Smith, Anthony D. M.. Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship; Australia - Materia
-
Fisheries Management
Itq
Marine Conservation
Maximum Sustainable Yield - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/19847
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_7acc2363a48f0725e8d5afccfef22735 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/19847 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?Melnychuk, Michael C.Essington, Timothy E.Trevor, Branch A.Heppell, Selina S.Jensen, Olaf P.Link, Jason S.Martell, Steven J. D.Parma, Ana MariaSmith, Anthony D. M.Fisheries ManagementItqMarine ConservationMaximum Sustainable Yieldhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations.Fil: Melnychuk, Michael C.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Essington, Timothy E.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Trevor, Branch A.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Heppell, Selina S.. Oregon State Universit; Estados UnidosFil: Jensen, Olaf P.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Link, Jason S.. Northeast Fisheries Science Center; Estados UnidosFil: Martell, Steven J. D.. International Pacific Halibut Commission; Estados UnidosFil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Smith, Anthony D. M.. Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship; AustraliaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2016-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/19847Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; et al.; Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Fish And Fisheries; 17; 1; 3-2016; 126-1421467-2960CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12094/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.1111/faf.12094info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:45:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/19847instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:45:39.87CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? |
title |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? |
spellingShingle |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? Melnychuk, Michael C. Fisheries Management Itq Marine Conservation Maximum Sustainable Yield |
title_short |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? |
title_full |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? |
title_fullStr |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? |
title_sort |
Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Melnychuk, Michael C. Essington, Timothy E. Trevor, Branch A. Heppell, Selina S. Jensen, Olaf P. Link, Jason S. Martell, Steven J. D. Parma, Ana Maria Smith, Anthony D. M. |
author |
Melnychuk, Michael C. |
author_facet |
Melnychuk, Michael C. Essington, Timothy E. Trevor, Branch A. Heppell, Selina S. Jensen, Olaf P. Link, Jason S. Martell, Steven J. D. Parma, Ana Maria Smith, Anthony D. M. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Essington, Timothy E. Trevor, Branch A. Heppell, Selina S. Jensen, Olaf P. Link, Jason S. Martell, Steven J. D. Parma, Ana Maria Smith, Anthony D. M. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Fisheries Management Itq Marine Conservation Maximum Sustainable Yield |
topic |
Fisheries Management Itq Marine Conservation Maximum Sustainable Yield |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations. Fil: Melnychuk, Michael C.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos Fil: Essington, Timothy E.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos Fil: Trevor, Branch A.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos Fil: Heppell, Selina S.. Oregon State Universit; Estados Unidos Fil: Jensen, Olaf P.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos Fil: Link, Jason S.. Northeast Fisheries Science Center; Estados Unidos Fil: Martell, Steven J. D.. International Pacific Halibut Commission; Estados Unidos Fil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina Fil: Smith, Anthony D. M.. Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship; Australia |
description |
Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/19847 Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; et al.; Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Fish And Fisheries; 17; 1; 3-2016; 126-142 1467-2960 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/19847 |
identifier_str_mv |
Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; et al.; Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Fish And Fisheries; 17; 1; 3-2016; 126-142 1467-2960 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12094/abstract info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.1111/faf.12094 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846082966507225088 |
score |
13.22299 |