Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?

Autores
Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; Link, Jason S.; Martell, Steven J. D.; Parma, Ana Maria; Smith, Anthony D. M.
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations.
Fil: Melnychuk, Michael C.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Essington, Timothy E.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Trevor, Branch A.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Heppell, Selina S.. Oregon State Universit; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jensen, Olaf P.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Link, Jason S.. Northeast Fisheries Science Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Martell, Steven J. D.. International Pacific Halibut Commission; Estados Unidos
Fil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Smith, Anthony D. M.. Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship; Australia
Materia
Fisheries Management
Itq
Marine Conservation
Maximum Sustainable Yield
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/19847

id CONICETDig_7acc2363a48f0725e8d5afccfef22735
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/19847
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?Melnychuk, Michael C.Essington, Timothy E.Trevor, Branch A.Heppell, Selina S.Jensen, Olaf P.Link, Jason S.Martell, Steven J. D.Parma, Ana MariaSmith, Anthony D. M.Fisheries ManagementItqMarine ConservationMaximum Sustainable Yieldhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations.Fil: Melnychuk, Michael C.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Essington, Timothy E.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Trevor, Branch A.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Heppell, Selina S.. Oregon State Universit; Estados UnidosFil: Jensen, Olaf P.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Link, Jason S.. Northeast Fisheries Science Center; Estados UnidosFil: Martell, Steven J. D.. International Pacific Halibut Commission; Estados UnidosFil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; ArgentinaFil: Smith, Anthony D. M.. Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship; AustraliaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2016-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/19847Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; et al.; Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Fish And Fisheries; 17; 1; 3-2016; 126-1421467-2960CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12094/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.1111/faf.12094info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:45:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/19847instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:45:39.87CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
title Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
spellingShingle Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
Melnychuk, Michael C.
Fisheries Management
Itq
Marine Conservation
Maximum Sustainable Yield
title_short Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
title_full Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
title_fullStr Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
title_full_unstemmed Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
title_sort Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Melnychuk, Michael C.
Essington, Timothy E.
Trevor, Branch A.
Heppell, Selina S.
Jensen, Olaf P.
Link, Jason S.
Martell, Steven J. D.
Parma, Ana Maria
Smith, Anthony D. M.
author Melnychuk, Michael C.
author_facet Melnychuk, Michael C.
Essington, Timothy E.
Trevor, Branch A.
Heppell, Selina S.
Jensen, Olaf P.
Link, Jason S.
Martell, Steven J. D.
Parma, Ana Maria
Smith, Anthony D. M.
author_role author
author2 Essington, Timothy E.
Trevor, Branch A.
Heppell, Selina S.
Jensen, Olaf P.
Link, Jason S.
Martell, Steven J. D.
Parma, Ana Maria
Smith, Anthony D. M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Fisheries Management
Itq
Marine Conservation
Maximum Sustainable Yield
topic Fisheries Management
Itq
Marine Conservation
Maximum Sustainable Yield
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations.
Fil: Melnychuk, Michael C.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Essington, Timothy E.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Trevor, Branch A.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Heppell, Selina S.. Oregon State Universit; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jensen, Olaf P.. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Link, Jason S.. Northeast Fisheries Science Center; Estados Unidos
Fil: Martell, Steven J. D.. International Pacific Halibut Commission; Estados Unidos
Fil: Parma, Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Centro Nacional Patagónico; Argentina
Fil: Smith, Anthony D. M.. Oceans and Atmosphere Flagship; Australia
description Individual quota (IQ) management systems in commercial marine fisheries are highly diverse, differing in the security, durability and exclusivity of the harvesting privilege and the transferability of quota units. This diversity in the degree of harvest rights may influence the effectiveness of IQ fisheries to meet management objectives. We conducted a global meta-analysis of 167 stocks managed under IQs to test whether the strength of harvest rights impacts the conservation status of stocks in terms of catch, exploitation rate and biomass relative to management targets. We used non-parametric methods to assess non-linear relationships and linear regression models to explicitly consider interactions among predictors. Most IQ fisheries consistently met fleet-wide quota limits (94% of stocks had recent catches below or within 10% of quotas), but only 2/3 of IQ fisheries adhered to sustainable management targets for biomass and exploitation rate (68% of stocks had exploitation rates below or within 10% of targets and 63% of stocks had biomass above or within 10% of biomass targets). Strikingly, when exclusivity of the harvesting privilege was low, exploitation rates depended on whether IQ implementation was industry-driven (exploitation below targets) or government-mandated (exploitation above targets). At high levels of exclusivity, exploitation rates converged to just below management targets. Transferability of quota units was associated with stock biomass closer to and slightly above target levels than stocks with non-transferable quota. However, regional differences had the strongest effect on biomass, suggesting that other management or biological attributes of regional fishery systems have greater influence on marine populations.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/19847
Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; et al.; Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Fish And Fisheries; 17; 1; 3-2016; 126-142
1467-2960
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/19847
identifier_str_mv Melnychuk, Michael C.; Essington, Timothy E.; Trevor, Branch A.; Heppell, Selina S.; Jensen, Olaf P.; et al.; Which design elements of individual quota fisheries help to achieve management objectives?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Fish And Fisheries; 17; 1; 3-2016; 126-142
1467-2960
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/faf.12094/abstract
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/ 10.1111/faf.12094
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082966507225088
score 13.22299