Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in ne...
- Autores
- Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio; Georgieff, Sergio Miguel; Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes; Romero, Fátima; Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo; Dominguez, Eduardo
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The baseline conditions for a particular river or stream type are essential to classify aquatic ecosystems based on physical and biological characteristics. In this study, we proposed a river typology for different ecoregions, climate and topography of northwestern Argentina using parameters, and combined key variables to establish reference conditions. A set of geographical, hydro-morphological, hydrological, geological (pedology and sedimentology) and physicochemical variables were measured from different rivers and analyzed with clustering and ordination techniques to develop a typology. We analyzed the correspondence of the physical river conditions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages using non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis, dissimilarity among assemblages, ANOSIM approach and envfit analysis in order to make an ecological validation of the classification. Our results allowed us to classify the neotropical rivers studied, according to typological systems adapted from the European Water Framework Directive. The combination of ecoregions and topography along with other variables associated (system B), was better corresponded with biological arrangements. Hence, ecoregions and topography combined turned out to be more precise as a criterion to define river types and their local abiotic and biotic reference conditions. Macroinvertebrate distribution corresponded with the classifications proposed and was related with abiotic features of the rivers. The physical variables as altitude, grain size, water temperature and turbidity were key parameters to develop a schematic model to define river types that could be implemented and tested in other countries of the region. Five river types have been identified, characterized, and included in three large groups: Mountains, Foothills, and Lowlands (Plains). Our results showed that topography and climate are two aspects that strongly influence South American freshwater biota. We propose the schematic model developed in our study as a baseline to define freshwater biomes based on altitude (topography), ecoregions (climate) and biological functional traits at a broad spatial scale (continental or global).
Fil: Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina
Fil: Georgieff, Sergio Miguel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina
Fil: Romero, Fátima. Fundación Miguel Lillo; Argentina
Fil: Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina
Fil: Dominguez, Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina - Materia
-
CLASSIFICATION
FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS
LANDSCAPE
SOUTH AMERICA - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146410
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_7a2638f4f0c903243f83a13607a410ca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146410 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers?Pero, Edgardo Javier IgnacioGeorgieff, Sergio MiguelGultemirian, Maria de LourdesRomero, FátimaHankel, Guillermo EduardoDominguez, EduardoCLASSIFICATIONFRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMSLANDSCAPESOUTH AMERICAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The baseline conditions for a particular river or stream type are essential to classify aquatic ecosystems based on physical and biological characteristics. In this study, we proposed a river typology for different ecoregions, climate and topography of northwestern Argentina using parameters, and combined key variables to establish reference conditions. A set of geographical, hydro-morphological, hydrological, geological (pedology and sedimentology) and physicochemical variables were measured from different rivers and analyzed with clustering and ordination techniques to develop a typology. We analyzed the correspondence of the physical river conditions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages using non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis, dissimilarity among assemblages, ANOSIM approach and envfit analysis in order to make an ecological validation of the classification. Our results allowed us to classify the neotropical rivers studied, according to typological systems adapted from the European Water Framework Directive. The combination of ecoregions and topography along with other variables associated (system B), was better corresponded with biological arrangements. Hence, ecoregions and topography combined turned out to be more precise as a criterion to define river types and their local abiotic and biotic reference conditions. Macroinvertebrate distribution corresponded with the classifications proposed and was related with abiotic features of the rivers. The physical variables as altitude, grain size, water temperature and turbidity were key parameters to develop a schematic model to define river types that could be implemented and tested in other countries of the region. Five river types have been identified, characterized, and included in three large groups: Mountains, Foothills, and Lowlands (Plains). Our results showed that topography and climate are two aspects that strongly influence South American freshwater biota. We propose the schematic model developed in our study as a baseline to define freshwater biomes based on altitude (topography), ecoregions (climate) and biological functional traits at a broad spatial scale (continental or global).Fil: Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; ArgentinaFil: Georgieff, Sergio Miguel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; ArgentinaFil: Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; ArgentinaFil: Romero, Fátima. Fundación Miguel Lillo; ArgentinaFil: Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; ArgentinaFil: Dominguez, Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; ArgentinaElsevier Science2020-10-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/146410Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio; Georgieff, Sergio Miguel; Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes; Romero, Fátima; Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo; et al.; Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers?; Elsevier Science; Science of the Total Environment; 738; 18-10-2020; 1-200048-9697CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140303info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720338250info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:33:05Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/146410instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:33:05.939CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? |
title |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? |
spellingShingle |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio CLASSIFICATION FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS LANDSCAPE SOUTH AMERICA |
title_short |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? |
title_full |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? |
title_fullStr |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? |
title_sort |
Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio Georgieff, Sergio Miguel Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes Romero, Fátima Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo Dominguez, Eduardo |
author |
Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio |
author_facet |
Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio Georgieff, Sergio Miguel Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes Romero, Fátima Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo Dominguez, Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Georgieff, Sergio Miguel Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes Romero, Fátima Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo Dominguez, Eduardo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CLASSIFICATION FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS LANDSCAPE SOUTH AMERICA |
topic |
CLASSIFICATION FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS LANDSCAPE SOUTH AMERICA |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The baseline conditions for a particular river or stream type are essential to classify aquatic ecosystems based on physical and biological characteristics. In this study, we proposed a river typology for different ecoregions, climate and topography of northwestern Argentina using parameters, and combined key variables to establish reference conditions. A set of geographical, hydro-morphological, hydrological, geological (pedology and sedimentology) and physicochemical variables were measured from different rivers and analyzed with clustering and ordination techniques to develop a typology. We analyzed the correspondence of the physical river conditions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages using non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis, dissimilarity among assemblages, ANOSIM approach and envfit analysis in order to make an ecological validation of the classification. Our results allowed us to classify the neotropical rivers studied, according to typological systems adapted from the European Water Framework Directive. The combination of ecoregions and topography along with other variables associated (system B), was better corresponded with biological arrangements. Hence, ecoregions and topography combined turned out to be more precise as a criterion to define river types and their local abiotic and biotic reference conditions. Macroinvertebrate distribution corresponded with the classifications proposed and was related with abiotic features of the rivers. The physical variables as altitude, grain size, water temperature and turbidity were key parameters to develop a schematic model to define river types that could be implemented and tested in other countries of the region. Five river types have been identified, characterized, and included in three large groups: Mountains, Foothills, and Lowlands (Plains). Our results showed that topography and climate are two aspects that strongly influence South American freshwater biota. We propose the schematic model developed in our study as a baseline to define freshwater biomes based on altitude (topography), ecoregions (climate) and biological functional traits at a broad spatial scale (continental or global). Fil: Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina Fil: Georgieff, Sergio Miguel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo; Argentina Fil: Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina Fil: Romero, Fátima. Fundación Miguel Lillo; Argentina Fil: Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina Fil: Dominguez, Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical. Instituto de Biodiversidad Neotropical; Argentina |
description |
The baseline conditions for a particular river or stream type are essential to classify aquatic ecosystems based on physical and biological characteristics. In this study, we proposed a river typology for different ecoregions, climate and topography of northwestern Argentina using parameters, and combined key variables to establish reference conditions. A set of geographical, hydro-morphological, hydrological, geological (pedology and sedimentology) and physicochemical variables were measured from different rivers and analyzed with clustering and ordination techniques to develop a typology. We analyzed the correspondence of the physical river conditions and benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages using non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis, dissimilarity among assemblages, ANOSIM approach and envfit analysis in order to make an ecological validation of the classification. Our results allowed us to classify the neotropical rivers studied, according to typological systems adapted from the European Water Framework Directive. The combination of ecoregions and topography along with other variables associated (system B), was better corresponded with biological arrangements. Hence, ecoregions and topography combined turned out to be more precise as a criterion to define river types and their local abiotic and biotic reference conditions. Macroinvertebrate distribution corresponded with the classifications proposed and was related with abiotic features of the rivers. The physical variables as altitude, grain size, water temperature and turbidity were key parameters to develop a schematic model to define river types that could be implemented and tested in other countries of the region. Five river types have been identified, characterized, and included in three large groups: Mountains, Foothills, and Lowlands (Plains). Our results showed that topography and climate are two aspects that strongly influence South American freshwater biota. We propose the schematic model developed in our study as a baseline to define freshwater biomes based on altitude (topography), ecoregions (climate) and biological functional traits at a broad spatial scale (continental or global). |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-18 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/146410 Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio; Georgieff, Sergio Miguel; Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes; Romero, Fátima; Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo; et al.; Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers?; Elsevier Science; Science of the Total Environment; 738; 18-10-2020; 1-20 0048-9697 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/146410 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pero, Edgardo Javier Ignacio; Georgieff, Sergio Miguel; Gultemirian, Maria de Lourdes; Romero, Fátima; Hankel, Guillermo Eduardo; et al.; Ecoregions, climate, topography, physicochemical, or a combination of all: Which criteria are the best to define river types based on abiotic variables and macroinvertebrates in neotropical rivers?; Elsevier Science; Science of the Total Environment; 738; 18-10-2020; 1-20 0048-9697 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140303 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720338250 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614346071605248 |
score |
13.070432 |