Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- Autores
- Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future.
Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: González Ortega, Sara. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: Cano, Santiago. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España
Fil: Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: Horcajo, Pilar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España - Materia
-
BOVINE ABORTION
INFECTIOUS AGENT
PREVALENCE
DIAGNOSIS
META-ANALYSIS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235914
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_792cde11ebaca5184f38d82097b0872b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235914 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysisHecker, Yanina PaolaGonzález Ortega, SaraCano, SantiagoOrtega Mora, Luis MiguelHorcajo, PilarBOVINE ABORTIONINFECTIOUS AGENTPREVALENCEDIAGNOSISMETA-ANALYSIShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future.Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFil: González Ortega, Sara. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFil: Cano, Santiago. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; EspañaFil: Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFil: Horcajo, Pilar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFrontiers Media2023-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/235914Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar; Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 10; 1249410; 29-9-2023; 1-1722971769CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:28:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235914instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:28:14.51CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis Hecker, Yanina Paola BOVINE ABORTION INFECTIOUS AGENT PREVALENCE DIAGNOSIS META-ANALYSIS |
title_short |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Hecker, Yanina Paola González Ortega, Sara Cano, Santiago Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel Horcajo, Pilar |
author |
Hecker, Yanina Paola |
author_facet |
Hecker, Yanina Paola González Ortega, Sara Cano, Santiago Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel Horcajo, Pilar |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
González Ortega, Sara Cano, Santiago Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel Horcajo, Pilar |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BOVINE ABORTION INFECTIOUS AGENT PREVALENCE DIAGNOSIS META-ANALYSIS |
topic |
BOVINE ABORTION INFECTIOUS AGENT PREVALENCE DIAGNOSIS META-ANALYSIS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future. Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España Fil: González Ortega, Sara. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España Fil: Cano, Santiago. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España Fil: Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España Fil: Horcajo, Pilar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España |
description |
The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09-29 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/235914 Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar; Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 10; 1249410; 29-9-2023; 1-17 22971769 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/235914 |
identifier_str_mv |
Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar; Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 10; 1249410; 29-9-2023; 1-17 22971769 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846082744969330688 |
score |
13.22299 |