Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Autores
Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future.
Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: González Ortega, Sara. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: Cano, Santiago. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España
Fil: Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: Horcajo, Pilar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Materia
BOVINE ABORTION
INFECTIOUS AGENT
PREVALENCE
DIAGNOSIS
META-ANALYSIS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235914

id CONICETDig_792cde11ebaca5184f38d82097b0872b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235914
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysisHecker, Yanina PaolaGonzález Ortega, SaraCano, SantiagoOrtega Mora, Luis MiguelHorcajo, PilarBOVINE ABORTIONINFECTIOUS AGENTPREVALENCEDIAGNOSISMETA-ANALYSIShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future.Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFil: González Ortega, Sara. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFil: Cano, Santiago. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; EspañaFil: Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFil: Horcajo, Pilar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; EspañaFrontiers Media2023-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/235914Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar; Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 10; 1249410; 29-9-2023; 1-1722971769CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:28:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/235914instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:28:14.51CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hecker, Yanina Paola
BOVINE ABORTION
INFECTIOUS AGENT
PREVALENCE
DIAGNOSIS
META-ANALYSIS
title_short Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hecker, Yanina Paola
González Ortega, Sara
Cano, Santiago
Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel
Horcajo, Pilar
author Hecker, Yanina Paola
author_facet Hecker, Yanina Paola
González Ortega, Sara
Cano, Santiago
Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel
Horcajo, Pilar
author_role author
author2 González Ortega, Sara
Cano, Santiago
Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel
Horcajo, Pilar
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BOVINE ABORTION
INFECTIOUS AGENT
PREVALENCE
DIAGNOSIS
META-ANALYSIS
topic BOVINE ABORTION
INFECTIOUS AGENT
PREVALENCE
DIAGNOSIS
META-ANALYSIS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future.
Fil: Hecker, Yanina Paola. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Buenos Aires Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: González Ortega, Sara. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: Cano, Santiago. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España
Fil: Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
Fil: Horcajo, Pilar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Facultad de Veterinaria; España
description The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the main infectious agents related to bovine abortion worldwide in the period between 2000 and 2022. First, we investigated the global prevalence of infectious agents related to bovine abortion. For this analysis, only 27 articles detected of a wide panel of agents were included. The random effects model revealed that the estimated prevalence of the abortifacient agents in bovine abortion was 45.7%.The heterogeneity among studies was high, but Egger’s test showed that there was no publication bias, even though the total number of samples analyzed in these articles was variable. There was no significant effect of the year of the study publication on the estimated prevalence, although an increasing trend was observed over time, possibly due to the implementation of new diagnostictechniques. Then, we analyzed the prevalence of the main transmissible agents in bovine abortion. For this analysis, 76 studies that analyzed 19,070 cases were included. Some infectious agent was detected in 7,319 specimens, and a final diagnosis was reached in 3,977 of these, when both the infectious agent and compatible histopathological changes were detected. We found that Neosporacaninum was the most detected agent (22.2%), followed by opportunistic bacteria (21.4%), Chlamydiaceae family (10.9%) and Coxiella burnetii (9.5%). Regarding viral agents, bovine herpes virus type 1 and bovine viral diarrhea displayed similar prevalence rates (approximately 5%). After considering the description of specific histopathological changes, our analyzes showed that N. caninum was a confirmed cause of abortion in 16.7% of the analyzed cases, followed byopportunistic bacteria (12.6%) and Chlamydia spp. (6.8%); however, C. burnetii was only confirmed as a cause of abortion in 1.1% of the cases. For all agents, the heterogeneity among studies was high, and the subgroup analyzes discarded the diagnostic method as the cause of such heterogeneity. This study provides knowledge about the global prevalence of the different infectious agents related to bovine abortion, the most coming of which is N. caninum. In addition, this review reveals the existing deficiencies in the diagnosis of bovine abortion that must be addressed in the future.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-29
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/235914
Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar; Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 10; 1249410; 29-9-2023; 1-17
22971769
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/235914
identifier_str_mv Hecker, Yanina Paola; González Ortega, Sara; Cano, Santiago; Ortega Mora, Luis Miguel; Horcajo, Pilar; Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Veterinary Science; 10; 1249410; 29-9-2023; 1-17
22971769
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082744969330688
score 13.22299