Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study

Autores
Fernández, Tomás; Maksimczuk, José Pablo
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The objective of this article can be easily stated: to analyse the different possible scenarios that might account for the presence of ‘the same fragment’ in different anthologies. We consider two or more fragments in different anthologies to be the ‘same’ or ‘duplicated’ when they share, substantially, the same content.1Usually, they will have a similar incipitand desinit, though this is not always required. The typology we offer arose from the practical need to cat-egorize the relationship between fragments presentin the 9th-or 10th-century Byzantine alphabetical anthology known as Florilegium Coislinianum.
Fil: Fernández, Tomás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Maksimczuk, José Pablo. Universitat Hamburg; Alemania
Materia
Bizancio
Crítica textual
Fragmentos
Compilaciones
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/206402
Acceder
id CONICETDig_785de2feecbb1428f20f630ec6f291d8
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/206402
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological StudyFernández, TomásMaksimczuk, José PabloBizancioCrítica textualFragmentosCompilacioneshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The objective of this article can be easily stated: to analyse the different possible scenarios that might account for the presence of ‘the same fragment’ in different anthologies. We consider two or more fragments in different anthologies to be the ‘same’ or ‘duplicated’ when they share, substantially, the same content.1Usually, they will have a similar incipitand desinit, though this is not always required. The typology we offer arose from the practical need to cat-egorize the relationship between fragments presentin the 9th-or 10th-century Byzantine alphabetical anthology known as Florilegium Coislinianum.Fil: Fernández, Tomás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaFil: Maksimczuk, José Pablo. Universitat Hamburg; AlemaniaDuke University Press2022-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/206402Fernández, Tomás; Maksimczuk, José Pablo; Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study; Duke University Press; Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; 62; 12-2022; 110-1312159-3159CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/16611info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:48:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/206402instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:48:38.652CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
title Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
spellingShingle Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
Fernández, Tomás
Bizancio
Crítica textual
Fragmentos
Compilaciones
title_short Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
title_full Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
title_fullStr Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
title_full_unstemmed Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
title_sort Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fernández, Tomás
Maksimczuk, José Pablo
author Fernández, Tomás
author_facet Fernández, Tomás
Maksimczuk, José Pablo
author_role author
author2 Maksimczuk, José Pablo
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bizancio
Crítica textual
Fragmentos
Compilaciones
topic Bizancio
Crítica textual
Fragmentos
Compilaciones
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The objective of this article can be easily stated: to analyse the different possible scenarios that might account for the presence of ‘the same fragment’ in different anthologies. We consider two or more fragments in different anthologies to be the ‘same’ or ‘duplicated’ when they share, substantially, the same content.1Usually, they will have a similar incipitand desinit, though this is not always required. The typology we offer arose from the practical need to cat-egorize the relationship between fragments presentin the 9th-or 10th-century Byzantine alphabetical anthology known as Florilegium Coislinianum.
Fil: Fernández, Tomás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Maksimczuk, José Pablo. Universitat Hamburg; Alemania
description The objective of this article can be easily stated: to analyse the different possible scenarios that might account for the presence of ‘the same fragment’ in different anthologies. We consider two or more fragments in different anthologies to be the ‘same’ or ‘duplicated’ when they share, substantially, the same content.1Usually, they will have a similar incipitand desinit, though this is not always required. The typology we offer arose from the practical need to cat-egorize the relationship between fragments presentin the 9th-or 10th-century Byzantine alphabetical anthology known as Florilegium Coislinianum.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/206402
Fernández, Tomás; Maksimczuk, José Pablo; Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study; Duke University Press; Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; 62; 12-2022; 110-131
2159-3159
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/206402
identifier_str_mv Fernández, Tomás; Maksimczuk, José Pablo; Duplicated Excerpts in Byzantine Anthologies: A Typological Study; Duke University Press; Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; 62; 12-2022; 110-131
2159-3159
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://grbs.library.duke.edu/article/view/16611
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Duke University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Duke University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083007186731008
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares