Persistence in diving American mink

Autores
Bagniewska, Joanna M.; Harrington, Lauren A.; Hart, Tom; Harrington, Andrew L.; Fasola, Laura; Macdonald, David W.
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: American mink forage on land and in water, with aquatic prey often constituting a large proportion of their diet. Their long, thin body shape and relatively poor insulation make them vulnerable to heat loss, particularly in water, yet some individuals dive over 100 times a day. At the level of individual dives, previous research found no difference in dive depth or duration, or the total number of dives per day between seasons, but mink did appear to make more dives per active hour in winter than in summer. There was also no difference in the depth or duration of individual dives between the sexes, but there was some evidence that females made more dives per day than males. However, because individual mink dives tend to be extremely short in duration, persistence (quantified as the number of consecutive dives performed) may be a more appropriate metric with which to compare diving behaviour under different scenarios. Results: Mink performed up to 28 consecutive dives, and dived continually for up to 36 min. Periods of more loosely aggregated diving (termed ‘aquatic activity sessions’) comprised up to 80 dives, carried out over up to 162.8 min. Contrary to our predictions, persistence was inversely proportional to body weight, with small animals more persistent than large ones, and (for females, but not for males) increased with decreasing temperature. For both sexes, persistence was greater during the day than during the night. Conclusions: The observed body weight effect may point to inter-sexual niche partitioning, since in mink the smallest animals are females and the largest are males. The results may equally point to individual specialism’s, since persistence was also highly variable among individuals. Given the energetic costs involved, the extreme persistence of some animals observed in winter suggests that the costs of occasional prolonged activity in cold water are outweighed by the energetic gains. Analysing dive persistence can provide information on an animal’s physical capabilities for performing multiple dives and may reveal how such behaviour is affected by different conditions. Further development of monitoring and biologging methodology to allow quantification of hunting success, and thus the rewards obtained under alternative scenarios, would be insightful.
Fil: Bagniewska, Joanna M.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido. University Of Reading; Reino Unido
Fil: Harrington, Lauren A.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Hart, Tom. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Harrington, Andrew L.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Fasola, Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Macdonald, David W.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
Materia
Neovison vison
Biologging
Semi-aquatic
Inter-sexual differences
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5456

id CONICETDig_7696ae268fe35b39a7854212b8dc0e35
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5456
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Persistence in diving American minkBagniewska, Joanna M.Harrington, Lauren A.Hart, TomHarrington, Andrew L.Fasola, LauraMacdonald, David W.Neovison visonBiologgingSemi-aquaticInter-sexual differenceshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Background: American mink forage on land and in water, with aquatic prey often constituting a large proportion of their diet. Their long, thin body shape and relatively poor insulation make them vulnerable to heat loss, particularly in water, yet some individuals dive over 100 times a day. At the level of individual dives, previous research found no difference in dive depth or duration, or the total number of dives per day between seasons, but mink did appear to make more dives per active hour in winter than in summer. There was also no difference in the depth or duration of individual dives between the sexes, but there was some evidence that females made more dives per day than males. However, because individual mink dives tend to be extremely short in duration, persistence (quantified as the number of consecutive dives performed) may be a more appropriate metric with which to compare diving behaviour under different scenarios. Results: Mink performed up to 28 consecutive dives, and dived continually for up to 36 min. Periods of more loosely aggregated diving (termed ‘aquatic activity sessions’) comprised up to 80 dives, carried out over up to 162.8 min. Contrary to our predictions, persistence was inversely proportional to body weight, with small animals more persistent than large ones, and (for females, but not for males) increased with decreasing temperature. For both sexes, persistence was greater during the day than during the night. Conclusions: The observed body weight effect may point to inter-sexual niche partitioning, since in mink the smallest animals are females and the largest are males. The results may equally point to individual specialism’s, since persistence was also highly variable among individuals. Given the energetic costs involved, the extreme persistence of some animals observed in winter suggests that the costs of occasional prolonged activity in cold water are outweighed by the energetic gains. Analysing dive persistence can provide information on an animal’s physical capabilities for performing multiple dives and may reveal how such behaviour is affected by different conditions. Further development of monitoring and biologging methodology to allow quantification of hunting success, and thus the rewards obtained under alternative scenarios, would be insightful.Fil: Bagniewska, Joanna M.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido. University Of Reading; Reino UnidoFil: Harrington, Lauren A.. University Of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Hart, Tom. University Of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Harrington, Andrew L.. University Of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Fasola, Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Macdonald, David W.. University Of Oxford; Reino UnidoSpringer2015-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/5456Bagniewska, Joanna M.; Harrington, Lauren A.; Hart, Tom; Harrington, Andrew L.; Fasola, Laura; et al.; Persistence in diving American mink; Springer; Animal Biotelemetry; 3; 18; 8-2015; 1-102050-3385enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://animalbiotelemetry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40317-015-0057-4info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186%2Fs40317-015-0057-4info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s40317-015-0057-4info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:45:21Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/5456instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:45:21.448CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Persistence in diving American mink
title Persistence in diving American mink
spellingShingle Persistence in diving American mink
Bagniewska, Joanna M.
Neovison vison
Biologging
Semi-aquatic
Inter-sexual differences
title_short Persistence in diving American mink
title_full Persistence in diving American mink
title_fullStr Persistence in diving American mink
title_full_unstemmed Persistence in diving American mink
title_sort Persistence in diving American mink
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bagniewska, Joanna M.
Harrington, Lauren A.
Hart, Tom
Harrington, Andrew L.
Fasola, Laura
Macdonald, David W.
author Bagniewska, Joanna M.
author_facet Bagniewska, Joanna M.
Harrington, Lauren A.
Hart, Tom
Harrington, Andrew L.
Fasola, Laura
Macdonald, David W.
author_role author
author2 Harrington, Lauren A.
Hart, Tom
Harrington, Andrew L.
Fasola, Laura
Macdonald, David W.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Neovison vison
Biologging
Semi-aquatic
Inter-sexual differences
topic Neovison vison
Biologging
Semi-aquatic
Inter-sexual differences
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: American mink forage on land and in water, with aquatic prey often constituting a large proportion of their diet. Their long, thin body shape and relatively poor insulation make them vulnerable to heat loss, particularly in water, yet some individuals dive over 100 times a day. At the level of individual dives, previous research found no difference in dive depth or duration, or the total number of dives per day between seasons, but mink did appear to make more dives per active hour in winter than in summer. There was also no difference in the depth or duration of individual dives between the sexes, but there was some evidence that females made more dives per day than males. However, because individual mink dives tend to be extremely short in duration, persistence (quantified as the number of consecutive dives performed) may be a more appropriate metric with which to compare diving behaviour under different scenarios. Results: Mink performed up to 28 consecutive dives, and dived continually for up to 36 min. Periods of more loosely aggregated diving (termed ‘aquatic activity sessions’) comprised up to 80 dives, carried out over up to 162.8 min. Contrary to our predictions, persistence was inversely proportional to body weight, with small animals more persistent than large ones, and (for females, but not for males) increased with decreasing temperature. For both sexes, persistence was greater during the day than during the night. Conclusions: The observed body weight effect may point to inter-sexual niche partitioning, since in mink the smallest animals are females and the largest are males. The results may equally point to individual specialism’s, since persistence was also highly variable among individuals. Given the energetic costs involved, the extreme persistence of some animals observed in winter suggests that the costs of occasional prolonged activity in cold water are outweighed by the energetic gains. Analysing dive persistence can provide information on an animal’s physical capabilities for performing multiple dives and may reveal how such behaviour is affected by different conditions. Further development of monitoring and biologging methodology to allow quantification of hunting success, and thus the rewards obtained under alternative scenarios, would be insightful.
Fil: Bagniewska, Joanna M.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido. University Of Reading; Reino Unido
Fil: Harrington, Lauren A.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Hart, Tom. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Harrington, Andrew L.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Fasola, Laura. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Macdonald, David W.. University Of Oxford; Reino Unido
description Background: American mink forage on land and in water, with aquatic prey often constituting a large proportion of their diet. Their long, thin body shape and relatively poor insulation make them vulnerable to heat loss, particularly in water, yet some individuals dive over 100 times a day. At the level of individual dives, previous research found no difference in dive depth or duration, or the total number of dives per day between seasons, but mink did appear to make more dives per active hour in winter than in summer. There was also no difference in the depth or duration of individual dives between the sexes, but there was some evidence that females made more dives per day than males. However, because individual mink dives tend to be extremely short in duration, persistence (quantified as the number of consecutive dives performed) may be a more appropriate metric with which to compare diving behaviour under different scenarios. Results: Mink performed up to 28 consecutive dives, and dived continually for up to 36 min. Periods of more loosely aggregated diving (termed ‘aquatic activity sessions’) comprised up to 80 dives, carried out over up to 162.8 min. Contrary to our predictions, persistence was inversely proportional to body weight, with small animals more persistent than large ones, and (for females, but not for males) increased with decreasing temperature. For both sexes, persistence was greater during the day than during the night. Conclusions: The observed body weight effect may point to inter-sexual niche partitioning, since in mink the smallest animals are females and the largest are males. The results may equally point to individual specialism’s, since persistence was also highly variable among individuals. Given the energetic costs involved, the extreme persistence of some animals observed in winter suggests that the costs of occasional prolonged activity in cold water are outweighed by the energetic gains. Analysing dive persistence can provide information on an animal’s physical capabilities for performing multiple dives and may reveal how such behaviour is affected by different conditions. Further development of monitoring and biologging methodology to allow quantification of hunting success, and thus the rewards obtained under alternative scenarios, would be insightful.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5456
Bagniewska, Joanna M.; Harrington, Lauren A.; Hart, Tom; Harrington, Andrew L.; Fasola, Laura; et al.; Persistence in diving American mink; Springer; Animal Biotelemetry; 3; 18; 8-2015; 1-10
2050-3385
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/5456
identifier_str_mv Bagniewska, Joanna M.; Harrington, Lauren A.; Hart, Tom; Harrington, Andrew L.; Fasola, Laura; et al.; Persistence in diving American mink; Springer; Animal Biotelemetry; 3; 18; 8-2015; 1-10
2050-3385
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://animalbiotelemetry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40317-015-0057-4
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186%2Fs40317-015-0057-4
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s40317-015-0057-4
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083553823031296
score 13.22299