The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters

Autores
Meneghetti, Massimo; Ragagnin, Antonio; Borgani, Stefano; Calura, Francesco; Despali, Giulia; Giocoli, Carlo; Granato, Gian Luigi; Grillo, Claudio; Moscardini, Lauro; Rasia, Elena; Rosati, Piero; Angora, Giuseppe; Bassini, Luigi; Bergamini, Pietro; Caminha, Gabriel B.; Granata, Giovanni; Mercurio, Amata; Metcalf, Robert Benton; Natarajan, Priyamvada; Nonino, Mario; Pignataro, Giada Venusta; Ragone Figueroa, Cinthia Judith; Vanzella, Eros; Acebron, Ana; Dolag, Klaus; Murante, Giuseppe; Taffoni, Giuliano; Tornatore, Luca; Tortorelli, Luca; Valentini, Milena
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Context. An excess of galaxy galaxy strong lensing (GGSL) in galaxy clusters compared to expectations from the cold-dark-matter (CDM) cosmological model has recently been reported. Theoretical estimates of the GGSL probability are based on the analysis of numerical hydrodynamical simulations in CDM cosmology. Aims. We quantify the impact of the numerical resolution and active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback scheme adopted in cosmological simulations on the predicted GGSL probability, and determine if varying these simulation properties can alleviate the gap with observations. Methods. We analyze cluster-size halos (M200 > 5 × 1014 M ) simulated with different mass and force resolutions and implementing several independent AGN feedback schemes. Our analysis focuses on galaxies with Einstein radii in the range 000 :5 = E = 300. Results. We find that improving the mass resolution by factors of 10 and 25, while using the same galaxy formation model that includes AGN feedback, does not affect the GGSL probability. We find similar results regarding the choice of gravitational softening. On the contrary, adopting an AGN feedback scheme that is less efficient at suppressing gas cooling and star formation leads to an increase in the GGSL probability by a factor of between 3 and 6. However, we notice that such simulations form overly massive galaxies whose contribution to the lensing cross section would be significant but that their Einstein radii are too large to be consistent with the observations. The primary contributors to the observed GGSL cross sections are galaxies with smaller masses that are compact enough to become critical for lensing. The population with these required characteristics appears to be absent from simulations. Conclusion. Based on these results, we reaffirm the tension between observations of GGSL and theoretical expectations in the framework of the ?CDM cosmological model. The GGSL probability is sensitive to the galaxy formation model implemented in the simulations. Still, all the tested models have difficulty simultaneously reproducing the stellar mass function and the internal structure of galaxies.
Fil: Meneghetti, Massimo. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Ragagnin, Antonio. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Borgani, Stefano. Università degli Studi di Trieste; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Calura, Francesco. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Despali, Giulia. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Giocoli, Carlo. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Granato, Gian Luigi. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Grillo, Claudio. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Moscardini, Lauro. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Rasia, Elena. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Rosati, Piero. Università di Ferrara; Italia
Fil: Angora, Giuseppe. Università di Ferrara; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Bassini, Luigi. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bergamini, Pietro. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Caminha, Gabriel B.. Gobierno de la República Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik; Alemania
Fil: Granata, Giovanni. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Mercurio, Amata. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Metcalf, Robert Benton. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Natarajan, Priyamvada. University of Yale; Estados Unidos
Fil: Nonino, Mario. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Pignataro, Giada Venusta. Istituto Di Radioastronomia; Italia. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Ragone Figueroa, Cinthia Judith. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Vanzella, Eros. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Acebron, Ana. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Dolag, Klaus. Gobierno de la República Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik; Alemania. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania
Fil: Murante, Giuseppe. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Taffoni, Giuliano. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Tornatore, Luca. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Tortorelli, Luca. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania
Fil: Valentini, Milena. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania
Materia
DARK MATTER
GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL
GRAVITATIONAL LENSING: STRONG
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203218

id CONICETDig_7572816391814654d8b11ca4f24453f4
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203218
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clustersMeneghetti, MassimoRagagnin, AntonioBorgani, StefanoCalura, FrancescoDespali, GiuliaGiocoli, CarloGranato, Gian LuigiGrillo, ClaudioMoscardini, LauroRasia, ElenaRosati, PieroAngora, GiuseppeBassini, LuigiBergamini, PietroCaminha, Gabriel B.Granata, GiovanniMercurio, AmataMetcalf, Robert BentonNatarajan, PriyamvadaNonino, MarioPignataro, Giada VenustaRagone Figueroa, Cinthia JudithVanzella, ErosAcebron, AnaDolag, KlausMurante, GiuseppeTaffoni, GiulianoTornatore, LucaTortorelli, LucaValentini, MilenaDARK MATTERGALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERALGRAVITATIONAL LENSING: STRONGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Context. An excess of galaxy galaxy strong lensing (GGSL) in galaxy clusters compared to expectations from the cold-dark-matter (CDM) cosmological model has recently been reported. Theoretical estimates of the GGSL probability are based on the analysis of numerical hydrodynamical simulations in CDM cosmology. Aims. We quantify the impact of the numerical resolution and active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback scheme adopted in cosmological simulations on the predicted GGSL probability, and determine if varying these simulation properties can alleviate the gap with observations. Methods. We analyze cluster-size halos (M200 > 5 × 1014 M ) simulated with different mass and force resolutions and implementing several independent AGN feedback schemes. Our analysis focuses on galaxies with Einstein radii in the range 000 :5 = E = 300. Results. We find that improving the mass resolution by factors of 10 and 25, while using the same galaxy formation model that includes AGN feedback, does not affect the GGSL probability. We find similar results regarding the choice of gravitational softening. On the contrary, adopting an AGN feedback scheme that is less efficient at suppressing gas cooling and star formation leads to an increase in the GGSL probability by a factor of between 3 and 6. However, we notice that such simulations form overly massive galaxies whose contribution to the lensing cross section would be significant but that their Einstein radii are too large to be consistent with the observations. The primary contributors to the observed GGSL cross sections are galaxies with smaller masses that are compact enough to become critical for lensing. The population with these required characteristics appears to be absent from simulations. Conclusion. Based on these results, we reaffirm the tension between observations of GGSL and theoretical expectations in the framework of the ?CDM cosmological model. The GGSL probability is sensitive to the galaxy formation model implemented in the simulations. Still, all the tested models have difficulty simultaneously reproducing the stellar mass function and the internal structure of galaxies.Fil: Meneghetti, Massimo. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Ragagnin, Antonio. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; ItaliaFil: Borgani, Stefano. Università degli Studi di Trieste; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; ItaliaFil: Calura, Francesco. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Despali, Giulia. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; AlemaniaFil: Giocoli, Carlo. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Granato, Gian Luigi. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Grillo, Claudio. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Moscardini, Lauro. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Rasia, Elena. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; ItaliaFil: Rosati, Piero. Università di Ferrara; ItaliaFil: Angora, Giuseppe. Università di Ferrara; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Bassini, Luigi. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Bergamini, Pietro. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Caminha, Gabriel B.. Gobierno de la República Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik; AlemaniaFil: Granata, Giovanni. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Mercurio, Amata. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Metcalf, Robert Benton. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Natarajan, Priyamvada. University of Yale; Estados UnidosFil: Nonino, Mario. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; ItaliaFil: Pignataro, Giada Venusta. Istituto Di Radioastronomia; Italia. Universidad de Bologna; ItaliaFil: Ragone Figueroa, Cinthia Judith. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Vanzella, Eros. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; ItaliaFil: Acebron, Ana. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Dolag, Klaus. Gobierno de la República Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik; Alemania. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; AlemaniaFil: Murante, Giuseppe. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; ItaliaFil: Taffoni, Giuliano. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; ItaliaFil: Tornatore, Luca. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; ItaliaFil: Tortorelli, Luca. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; AlemaniaFil: Valentini, Milena. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; AlemaniaEDP Sciences2022-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/203218Meneghetti, Massimo; Ragagnin, Antonio; Borgani, Stefano; Calura, Francesco; Despali, Giulia; et al.; The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters; EDP Sciences; Astronomy and Astrophysics; 668; A188; 12-2022; 1-140004-6361CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1051/0004-6361/202243779info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2022/12/aa43779-22/aa43779-22.htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:26:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203218instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:26:38.299CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
title The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
spellingShingle The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
Meneghetti, Massimo
DARK MATTER
GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL
GRAVITATIONAL LENSING: STRONG
title_short The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
title_full The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
title_fullStr The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
title_full_unstemmed The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
title_sort The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Meneghetti, Massimo
Ragagnin, Antonio
Borgani, Stefano
Calura, Francesco
Despali, Giulia
Giocoli, Carlo
Granato, Gian Luigi
Grillo, Claudio
Moscardini, Lauro
Rasia, Elena
Rosati, Piero
Angora, Giuseppe
Bassini, Luigi
Bergamini, Pietro
Caminha, Gabriel B.
Granata, Giovanni
Mercurio, Amata
Metcalf, Robert Benton
Natarajan, Priyamvada
Nonino, Mario
Pignataro, Giada Venusta
Ragone Figueroa, Cinthia Judith
Vanzella, Eros
Acebron, Ana
Dolag, Klaus
Murante, Giuseppe
Taffoni, Giuliano
Tornatore, Luca
Tortorelli, Luca
Valentini, Milena
author Meneghetti, Massimo
author_facet Meneghetti, Massimo
Ragagnin, Antonio
Borgani, Stefano
Calura, Francesco
Despali, Giulia
Giocoli, Carlo
Granato, Gian Luigi
Grillo, Claudio
Moscardini, Lauro
Rasia, Elena
Rosati, Piero
Angora, Giuseppe
Bassini, Luigi
Bergamini, Pietro
Caminha, Gabriel B.
Granata, Giovanni
Mercurio, Amata
Metcalf, Robert Benton
Natarajan, Priyamvada
Nonino, Mario
Pignataro, Giada Venusta
Ragone Figueroa, Cinthia Judith
Vanzella, Eros
Acebron, Ana
Dolag, Klaus
Murante, Giuseppe
Taffoni, Giuliano
Tornatore, Luca
Tortorelli, Luca
Valentini, Milena
author_role author
author2 Ragagnin, Antonio
Borgani, Stefano
Calura, Francesco
Despali, Giulia
Giocoli, Carlo
Granato, Gian Luigi
Grillo, Claudio
Moscardini, Lauro
Rasia, Elena
Rosati, Piero
Angora, Giuseppe
Bassini, Luigi
Bergamini, Pietro
Caminha, Gabriel B.
Granata, Giovanni
Mercurio, Amata
Metcalf, Robert Benton
Natarajan, Priyamvada
Nonino, Mario
Pignataro, Giada Venusta
Ragone Figueroa, Cinthia Judith
Vanzella, Eros
Acebron, Ana
Dolag, Klaus
Murante, Giuseppe
Taffoni, Giuliano
Tornatore, Luca
Tortorelli, Luca
Valentini, Milena
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DARK MATTER
GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL
GRAVITATIONAL LENSING: STRONG
topic DARK MATTER
GALAXIES: CLUSTERS: GENERAL
GRAVITATIONAL LENSING: STRONG
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Context. An excess of galaxy galaxy strong lensing (GGSL) in galaxy clusters compared to expectations from the cold-dark-matter (CDM) cosmological model has recently been reported. Theoretical estimates of the GGSL probability are based on the analysis of numerical hydrodynamical simulations in CDM cosmology. Aims. We quantify the impact of the numerical resolution and active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback scheme adopted in cosmological simulations on the predicted GGSL probability, and determine if varying these simulation properties can alleviate the gap with observations. Methods. We analyze cluster-size halos (M200 > 5 × 1014 M ) simulated with different mass and force resolutions and implementing several independent AGN feedback schemes. Our analysis focuses on galaxies with Einstein radii in the range 000 :5 = E = 300. Results. We find that improving the mass resolution by factors of 10 and 25, while using the same galaxy formation model that includes AGN feedback, does not affect the GGSL probability. We find similar results regarding the choice of gravitational softening. On the contrary, adopting an AGN feedback scheme that is less efficient at suppressing gas cooling and star formation leads to an increase in the GGSL probability by a factor of between 3 and 6. However, we notice that such simulations form overly massive galaxies whose contribution to the lensing cross section would be significant but that their Einstein radii are too large to be consistent with the observations. The primary contributors to the observed GGSL cross sections are galaxies with smaller masses that are compact enough to become critical for lensing. The population with these required characteristics appears to be absent from simulations. Conclusion. Based on these results, we reaffirm the tension between observations of GGSL and theoretical expectations in the framework of the ?CDM cosmological model. The GGSL probability is sensitive to the galaxy formation model implemented in the simulations. Still, all the tested models have difficulty simultaneously reproducing the stellar mass function and the internal structure of galaxies.
Fil: Meneghetti, Massimo. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Ragagnin, Antonio. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Borgani, Stefano. Università degli Studi di Trieste; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Calura, Francesco. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Despali, Giulia. Ruprecht Karls Universitat Heidelberg; Alemania
Fil: Giocoli, Carlo. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Granato, Gian Luigi. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Grillo, Claudio. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Moscardini, Lauro. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Rasia, Elena. Institute For Fundamental Physics Of The Universe; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Rosati, Piero. Università di Ferrara; Italia
Fil: Angora, Giuseppe. Università di Ferrara; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Bassini, Luigi. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Bergamini, Pietro. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Caminha, Gabriel B.. Gobierno de la República Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik; Alemania
Fil: Granata, Giovanni. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Mercurio, Amata. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Metcalf, Robert Benton. Universidad de Bologna; Italia. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Natarajan, Priyamvada. University of Yale; Estados Unidos
Fil: Nonino, Mario. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Pignataro, Giada Venusta. Istituto Di Radioastronomia; Italia. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Ragone Figueroa, Cinthia Judith. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental; Argentina. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Vanzella, Eros. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica; Italia
Fil: Acebron, Ana. Università degli Studi di Milano; Italia
Fil: Dolag, Klaus. Gobierno de la República Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik; Alemania. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania
Fil: Murante, Giuseppe. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Taffoni, Giuliano. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Tornatore, Luca. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare; Italia
Fil: Tortorelli, Luca. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania
Fil: Valentini, Milena. Ludwig Maximilians Universitat; Alemania
description Context. An excess of galaxy galaxy strong lensing (GGSL) in galaxy clusters compared to expectations from the cold-dark-matter (CDM) cosmological model has recently been reported. Theoretical estimates of the GGSL probability are based on the analysis of numerical hydrodynamical simulations in CDM cosmology. Aims. We quantify the impact of the numerical resolution and active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback scheme adopted in cosmological simulations on the predicted GGSL probability, and determine if varying these simulation properties can alleviate the gap with observations. Methods. We analyze cluster-size halos (M200 > 5 × 1014 M ) simulated with different mass and force resolutions and implementing several independent AGN feedback schemes. Our analysis focuses on galaxies with Einstein radii in the range 000 :5 = E = 300. Results. We find that improving the mass resolution by factors of 10 and 25, while using the same galaxy formation model that includes AGN feedback, does not affect the GGSL probability. We find similar results regarding the choice of gravitational softening. On the contrary, adopting an AGN feedback scheme that is less efficient at suppressing gas cooling and star formation leads to an increase in the GGSL probability by a factor of between 3 and 6. However, we notice that such simulations form overly massive galaxies whose contribution to the lensing cross section would be significant but that their Einstein radii are too large to be consistent with the observations. The primary contributors to the observed GGSL cross sections are galaxies with smaller masses that are compact enough to become critical for lensing. The population with these required characteristics appears to be absent from simulations. Conclusion. Based on these results, we reaffirm the tension between observations of GGSL and theoretical expectations in the framework of the ?CDM cosmological model. The GGSL probability is sensitive to the galaxy formation model implemented in the simulations. Still, all the tested models have difficulty simultaneously reproducing the stellar mass function and the internal structure of galaxies.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203218
Meneghetti, Massimo; Ragagnin, Antonio; Borgani, Stefano; Calura, Francesco; Despali, Giulia; et al.; The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters; EDP Sciences; Astronomy and Astrophysics; 668; A188; 12-2022; 1-14
0004-6361
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203218
identifier_str_mv Meneghetti, Massimo; Ragagnin, Antonio; Borgani, Stefano; Calura, Francesco; Despali, Giulia; et al.; The probability of galaxy- galaxy strong lensing events in hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy clusters; EDP Sciences; Astronomy and Astrophysics; 668; A188; 12-2022; 1-14
0004-6361
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1051/0004-6361/202243779
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2022/12/aa43779-22/aa43779-22.html
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDP Sciences
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDP Sciences
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781827099918336
score 12.982451