Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system

Autores
Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; Jaeger, Horst; Parodi, Juan; Schönholz, Claudio; Milei, Jose
Año de publicación
2002
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.)
Fil: Whitlow, Patrick L.. No especifíca;
Fil: Lylyk, Pedro. No especifíca;
Fil: Londero, Walter Hugo. No especifíca;
Fil: Mendiz, Oscar A.. No especifíca;
Fil: Mathias, Klaus. No especifíca;
Fil: Jaeger, Horst. No especifíca;
Fil: Parodi, Juan. No especifíca;
Fil: Schönholz, Claudio. No especifíca;
Fil: Milei, Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; Argentina
Materia
carotid artery diseases
carotid endarterectomy
stents
stroke
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/153068

id CONICETDig_74ebc2829febc06cbd8eecfc2fa83e8d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/153068
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment systemWhitlow, Patrick L.Lylyk, PedroLondero, Walter HugoMendiz, Oscar A.Mathias, KlausJaeger, HorstParodi, JuanSchönholz, ClaudioMilei, Josecarotid artery diseasescarotid endarterectomystentsstrokehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.)Fil: Whitlow, Patrick L.. No especifíca;Fil: Lylyk, Pedro. No especifíca;Fil: Londero, Walter Hugo. No especifíca;Fil: Mendiz, Oscar A.. No especifíca;Fil: Mathias, Klaus. No especifíca;Fil: Jaeger, Horst. No especifíca;Fil: Parodi, Juan. No especifíca;Fil: Schönholz, Claudio. No especifíca;Fil: Milei, Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; ArgentinaLippincott Williams2002-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/153068Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; et al.; Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system; Lippincott Williams; Stroke; 33; 5-2002; 1308-13140039-2499CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.STR.0000013947.17575.B3info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:09:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/153068instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:09:23.625CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
title Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
spellingShingle Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
Whitlow, Patrick L.
carotid artery diseases
carotid endarterectomy
stents
stroke
title_short Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
title_full Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
title_fullStr Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
title_full_unstemmed Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
title_sort Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Whitlow, Patrick L.
Lylyk, Pedro
Londero, Walter Hugo
Mendiz, Oscar A.
Mathias, Klaus
Jaeger, Horst
Parodi, Juan
Schönholz, Claudio
Milei, Jose
author Whitlow, Patrick L.
author_facet Whitlow, Patrick L.
Lylyk, Pedro
Londero, Walter Hugo
Mendiz, Oscar A.
Mathias, Klaus
Jaeger, Horst
Parodi, Juan
Schönholz, Claudio
Milei, Jose
author_role author
author2 Lylyk, Pedro
Londero, Walter Hugo
Mendiz, Oscar A.
Mathias, Klaus
Jaeger, Horst
Parodi, Juan
Schönholz, Claudio
Milei, Jose
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv carotid artery diseases
carotid endarterectomy
stents
stroke
topic carotid artery diseases
carotid endarterectomy
stents
stroke
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.)
Fil: Whitlow, Patrick L.. No especifíca;
Fil: Lylyk, Pedro. No especifíca;
Fil: Londero, Walter Hugo. No especifíca;
Fil: Mendiz, Oscar A.. No especifíca;
Fil: Mathias, Klaus. No especifíca;
Fil: Jaeger, Horst. No especifíca;
Fil: Parodi, Juan. No especifíca;
Fil: Schönholz, Claudio. No especifíca;
Fil: Milei, Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; Argentina
description Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.)
publishDate 2002
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2002-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/153068
Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; et al.; Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system; Lippincott Williams; Stroke; 33; 5-2002; 1308-1314
0039-2499
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/153068
identifier_str_mv Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; et al.; Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system; Lippincott Williams; Stroke; 33; 5-2002; 1308-1314
0039-2499
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.STR.0000013947.17575.B3
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott Williams
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Lippincott Williams
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270078753570816
score 13.13397