Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system
- Autores
- Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; Jaeger, Horst; Parodi, Juan; Schönholz, Claudio; Milei, Jose
- Año de publicación
- 2002
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.)
Fil: Whitlow, Patrick L.. No especifíca;
Fil: Lylyk, Pedro. No especifíca;
Fil: Londero, Walter Hugo. No especifíca;
Fil: Mendiz, Oscar A.. No especifíca;
Fil: Mathias, Klaus. No especifíca;
Fil: Jaeger, Horst. No especifíca;
Fil: Parodi, Juan. No especifíca;
Fil: Schönholz, Claudio. No especifíca;
Fil: Milei, Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; Argentina - Materia
-
carotid artery diseases
carotid endarterectomy
stents
stroke - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/153068
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_74ebc2829febc06cbd8eecfc2fa83e8d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/153068 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment systemWhitlow, Patrick L.Lylyk, PedroLondero, Walter HugoMendiz, Oscar A.Mathias, KlausJaeger, HorstParodi, JuanSchönholz, ClaudioMilei, Josecarotid artery diseasescarotid endarterectomystentsstrokehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.)Fil: Whitlow, Patrick L.. No especifíca;Fil: Lylyk, Pedro. No especifíca;Fil: Londero, Walter Hugo. No especifíca;Fil: Mendiz, Oscar A.. No especifíca;Fil: Mathias, Klaus. No especifíca;Fil: Jaeger, Horst. No especifíca;Fil: Parodi, Juan. No especifíca;Fil: Schönholz, Claudio. No especifíca;Fil: Milei, Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; ArgentinaLippincott Williams2002-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/153068Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; et al.; Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system; Lippincott Williams; Stroke; 33; 5-2002; 1308-13140039-2499CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.STR.0000013947.17575.B3info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:09:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/153068instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:09:23.625CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system |
title |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system |
spellingShingle |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system Whitlow, Patrick L. carotid artery diseases carotid endarterectomy stents stroke |
title_short |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system |
title_full |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system |
title_fullStr |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system |
title_sort |
Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Whitlow, Patrick L. Lylyk, Pedro Londero, Walter Hugo Mendiz, Oscar A. Mathias, Klaus Jaeger, Horst Parodi, Juan Schönholz, Claudio Milei, Jose |
author |
Whitlow, Patrick L. |
author_facet |
Whitlow, Patrick L. Lylyk, Pedro Londero, Walter Hugo Mendiz, Oscar A. Mathias, Klaus Jaeger, Horst Parodi, Juan Schönholz, Claudio Milei, Jose |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lylyk, Pedro Londero, Walter Hugo Mendiz, Oscar A. Mathias, Klaus Jaeger, Horst Parodi, Juan Schönholz, Claudio Milei, Jose |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
carotid artery diseases carotid endarterectomy stents stroke |
topic |
carotid artery diseases carotid endarterectomy stents stroke |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.) Fil: Whitlow, Patrick L.. No especifíca; Fil: Lylyk, Pedro. No especifíca; Fil: Londero, Walter Hugo. No especifíca; Fil: Mendiz, Oscar A.. No especifíca; Fil: Mathias, Klaus. No especifíca; Fil: Jaeger, Horst. No especifíca; Fil: Parodi, Juan. No especifíca; Fil: Schönholz, Claudio. No especifíca; Fil: Milei, Jose. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Cardiológicas; Argentina |
description |
Background and Purpose—Fear of distal embolization and stroke has aroused concern regarding carotid stenting. Devices to protect the cerebral circulation may make carotid stenting safer. Methods—A multidisciplinary study group tested a balloon occlusion-aspiration emboli entrapment device in conjunction with carotid stenting. The device consists of an elastomeric balloon on a steerable wire with a detachable adapter that inflates and deflates the distal temporary occlusion balloon. An aspiration catheter is used to remove trapped emboli after stenting and before occlusion balloon deflation. Results—Seventy-five patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis were treated with stents deployed with this cerebrovasculature protection system. All 75 patients (100%) had grossly visible particulate material aspirated, and all were treated successfully without major or minor stroke or death at 30 days. Preintervention stenosis was 81 10%, and residual stenosis was 5 7%. Nine patients (12%) had angiographic evidence of thrombus before intervention, but no patient had thrombus or vessel cutoff after the procedure. Four patients (5%) developed transient neurological symptoms during protection balloon occlusion, but symptoms resolved with balloon deflation. The 22 to 667 particles aspirated per patient ranged from 3.6 to 5262 m in maximum diameter (mean, 203 256 m). These particles included fibrous plaque debris, lipid or cholesterol vacuoles, and calcific plaque fragments. Conclusions—Protected carotid stenting was performed successfully and safely in this study early in the experience with cerebrovascular protection devices. Particulate emboli are frequent with stenting, and cerebral protection will likely be necessary to minimize stroke. Randomized trials comparing protected carotid stenting with endarterectomy are warranted. (Stroke. 2002;33:1308-1314.) |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/153068 Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; et al.; Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system; Lippincott Williams; Stroke; 33; 5-2002; 1308-1314 0039-2499 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/153068 |
identifier_str_mv |
Whitlow, Patrick L.; Lylyk, Pedro; Londero, Walter Hugo; Mendiz, Oscar A.; Mathias, Klaus; et al.; Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system; Lippincott Williams; Stroke; 33; 5-2002; 1308-1314 0039-2499 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.STR.0000013947.17575.B3 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lippincott Williams |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Lippincott Williams |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842270078753570816 |
score |
13.13397 |