Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Autores
Schutze, M. K.; Jessup, A.; Ul Haq, I.; Vreysen, M. J. B.; Wornayporn, V.; Vera, Maria Teresa; Clarke, A. R.
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), Bactrocera papayae Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera philippinensis Drew & Hancock, and Bactrocera carambolae Drew & Hancock are pest members within the B. dorsalis species complex of tropical fruit flies. The species status of these taxa is unclear and this confounds quarantine, pest management, and general research. Mating studies carried out under uniform experimental conditions are required as part of resolving their species limits. These four taxa were collected from the wild and established as laboratory cultures for which we subsequently determined levels of prezygotic compatibility, assessed by field cage mating trials for all pair-wise combinations. We demonstrate random mating among all pair-wise combinations involving B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis. B. carambolae was relatively incompatible with each of these species as evidenced by nonrandom mating for all crosses. Reasons for incompatibility involving B. carambolae remain unclear; however, we observed differences in the location of couples in the field cage for some comparisons. Alongside other factors such as pheromone composition or other courtship signals, this may lead to reduced interspecific mating compatibility with B. carambolae. These data add to evidence that B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis represent the same biological species, while B. carambolae remains sufficiently different to maintain its current taxonomic identity. This poses significant implications for this group's systematics, impacting on pest management, and international trade.
Fil: Schutze, M. K.. CRC for National Plant Biosecurity; Australia. University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Jessup, A.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria. NSW Department of Primary Industries; Australia
Fil: Ul Haq, I.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria
Fil: Vreysen, M. J. B.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria
Fil: Wornayporn, V.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria
Fil: Vera, Maria Teresa. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia. Cátedra. Terapéutica Vegetal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán; Argentina
Fil: Clarke, A. R.. CRC for National Plant Biosecurity; Australia. University Of Queensland; Australia
Materia
Bactrocera Dorsalis
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/7307
Acceder
id CONICETDig_74a1cf9e1b8f170afb8bba68417f3313
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/7307
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)Schutze, M. K.Jessup, A.Ul Haq, I.Vreysen, M. J. B.Wornayporn, V.Vera, Maria TeresaClarke, A. R.Bactrocera Dorsalishttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), Bactrocera papayae Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera philippinensis Drew & Hancock, and Bactrocera carambolae Drew & Hancock are pest members within the B. dorsalis species complex of tropical fruit flies. The species status of these taxa is unclear and this confounds quarantine, pest management, and general research. Mating studies carried out under uniform experimental conditions are required as part of resolving their species limits. These four taxa were collected from the wild and established as laboratory cultures for which we subsequently determined levels of prezygotic compatibility, assessed by field cage mating trials for all pair-wise combinations. We demonstrate random mating among all pair-wise combinations involving B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis. B. carambolae was relatively incompatible with each of these species as evidenced by nonrandom mating for all crosses. Reasons for incompatibility involving B. carambolae remain unclear; however, we observed differences in the location of couples in the field cage for some comparisons. Alongside other factors such as pheromone composition or other courtship signals, this may lead to reduced interspecific mating compatibility with B. carambolae. These data add to evidence that B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis represent the same biological species, while B. carambolae remains sufficiently different to maintain its current taxonomic identity. This poses significant implications for this group's systematics, impacting on pest management, and international trade.Fil: Schutze, M. K.. CRC for National Plant Biosecurity; Australia. University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Jessup, A.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria. NSW Department of Primary Industries; AustraliaFil: Ul Haq, I.. International Atomic Energy Agency; AustriaFil: Vreysen, M. J. B.. International Atomic Energy Agency; AustriaFil: Wornayporn, V.. International Atomic Energy Agency; AustriaFil: Vera, Maria Teresa. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia. Cátedra. Terapéutica Vegetal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán; ArgentinaFil: Clarke, A. R.. CRC for National Plant Biosecurity; Australia. University Of Queensland; AustraliaEntomological Society Of America2013-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/7307Schutze, M. K.; Jessup, A.; Ul Haq, I.; Vreysen, M. J. B.; Wornayporn, V.; et al.; Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae); Entomological Society Of America; Journal Of Economic Entomology; 106; 2; 4-2013; 695-7070022-0493enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://jee.oxfordjournals.org/content/106/2/695.longinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1603/EC12409info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1603/EC12409info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:50:10Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/7307instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:50:10.836CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
title Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
spellingShingle Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Schutze, M. K.
Bactrocera Dorsalis
title_short Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
title_full Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
title_fullStr Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
title_full_unstemmed Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
title_sort Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Schutze, M. K.
Jessup, A.
Ul Haq, I.
Vreysen, M. J. B.
Wornayporn, V.
Vera, Maria Teresa
Clarke, A. R.
author Schutze, M. K.
author_facet Schutze, M. K.
Jessup, A.
Ul Haq, I.
Vreysen, M. J. B.
Wornayporn, V.
Vera, Maria Teresa
Clarke, A. R.
author_role author
author2 Jessup, A.
Ul Haq, I.
Vreysen, M. J. B.
Wornayporn, V.
Vera, Maria Teresa
Clarke, A. R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bactrocera Dorsalis
topic Bactrocera Dorsalis
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), Bactrocera papayae Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera philippinensis Drew & Hancock, and Bactrocera carambolae Drew & Hancock are pest members within the B. dorsalis species complex of tropical fruit flies. The species status of these taxa is unclear and this confounds quarantine, pest management, and general research. Mating studies carried out under uniform experimental conditions are required as part of resolving their species limits. These four taxa were collected from the wild and established as laboratory cultures for which we subsequently determined levels of prezygotic compatibility, assessed by field cage mating trials for all pair-wise combinations. We demonstrate random mating among all pair-wise combinations involving B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis. B. carambolae was relatively incompatible with each of these species as evidenced by nonrandom mating for all crosses. Reasons for incompatibility involving B. carambolae remain unclear; however, we observed differences in the location of couples in the field cage for some comparisons. Alongside other factors such as pheromone composition or other courtship signals, this may lead to reduced interspecific mating compatibility with B. carambolae. These data add to evidence that B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis represent the same biological species, while B. carambolae remains sufficiently different to maintain its current taxonomic identity. This poses significant implications for this group's systematics, impacting on pest management, and international trade.
Fil: Schutze, M. K.. CRC for National Plant Biosecurity; Australia. University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Jessup, A.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria. NSW Department of Primary Industries; Australia
Fil: Ul Haq, I.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria
Fil: Vreysen, M. J. B.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria
Fil: Wornayporn, V.. International Atomic Energy Agency; Austria
Fil: Vera, Maria Teresa. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Agronomía y Zootecnia. Cátedra. Terapéutica Vegetal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tucumán; Argentina
Fil: Clarke, A. R.. CRC for National Plant Biosecurity; Australia. University Of Queensland; Australia
description Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), Bactrocera papayae Drew & Hancock, Bactrocera philippinensis Drew & Hancock, and Bactrocera carambolae Drew & Hancock are pest members within the B. dorsalis species complex of tropical fruit flies. The species status of these taxa is unclear and this confounds quarantine, pest management, and general research. Mating studies carried out under uniform experimental conditions are required as part of resolving their species limits. These four taxa were collected from the wild and established as laboratory cultures for which we subsequently determined levels of prezygotic compatibility, assessed by field cage mating trials for all pair-wise combinations. We demonstrate random mating among all pair-wise combinations involving B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis. B. carambolae was relatively incompatible with each of these species as evidenced by nonrandom mating for all crosses. Reasons for incompatibility involving B. carambolae remain unclear; however, we observed differences in the location of couples in the field cage for some comparisons. Alongside other factors such as pheromone composition or other courtship signals, this may lead to reduced interspecific mating compatibility with B. carambolae. These data add to evidence that B. dorsalis, B. papayae, and B. philippinensis represent the same biological species, while B. carambolae remains sufficiently different to maintain its current taxonomic identity. This poses significant implications for this group's systematics, impacting on pest management, and international trade.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/7307
Schutze, M. K.; Jessup, A.; Ul Haq, I.; Vreysen, M. J. B.; Wornayporn, V.; et al.; Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae); Entomological Society Of America; Journal Of Economic Entomology; 106; 2; 4-2013; 695-707
0022-0493
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/7307
identifier_str_mv Schutze, M. K.; Jessup, A.; Ul Haq, I.; Vreysen, M. J. B.; Wornayporn, V.; et al.; Mating compatibility among four pest members of the Bactrocera dorsalis fruit fly species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae); Entomological Society Of America; Journal Of Economic Entomology; 106; 2; 4-2013; 695-707
0022-0493
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://jee.oxfordjournals.org/content/106/2/695.long
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1603/EC12409
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1603/EC12409
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Entomological Society Of America
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Entomological Society Of America
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269017797033984
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares