Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America
- Autores
- Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Intense forms of judicial activism have emerged in Latin American in the last three decades. Judges dictated Structural Remedies Decisions (SRDs) ordering to create, design, and implement public policies to redress structural human rights violations; and implementing permanent judicial monitoring of the policy process. In a region marked by judicial instability, SRDs are risky options for judges. They can be seen as strong challenges to government and, thus, prompt retaliation. They can also damage judges´ reputation as they might be strongly criticized by influential conservative groups of society opposing progressive structural reforms.What drives judges to pursue or avoid this kind of risky activism? I propose the Equilibrist Approach, an alternative model to standard accounts explaining judicial behavior in Latin America. It incorporates the legitimacy building dimension of the strategic game and predicts some level of assertiveness, but one that is careful about elites´ preferences and those of the mass public and opinion leaders. I use the institutional fragile Argentine Supreme Court to test the model, as it decided several SDRs in the early 2000s.
Fil: Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de Tucuman. Facultad de Derecho y Cs.sociales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina - Materia
-
JUDICIAL POLITICS
PUBLIC LAW
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
STRUCTURAL REMEDIES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239195
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_7173e17a567d9b554ac21ba11957b7fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239195 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin AmericaPereira, Jose Roberto GabrielJUDICIAL POLITICSPUBLIC LAWCONSTITUTIONAL LAWSTRUCTURAL REMEDIEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Intense forms of judicial activism have emerged in Latin American in the last three decades. Judges dictated Structural Remedies Decisions (SRDs) ordering to create, design, and implement public policies to redress structural human rights violations; and implementing permanent judicial monitoring of the policy process. In a region marked by judicial instability, SRDs are risky options for judges. They can be seen as strong challenges to government and, thus, prompt retaliation. They can also damage judges´ reputation as they might be strongly criticized by influential conservative groups of society opposing progressive structural reforms.What drives judges to pursue or avoid this kind of risky activism? I propose the Equilibrist Approach, an alternative model to standard accounts explaining judicial behavior in Latin America. It incorporates the legitimacy building dimension of the strategic game and predicts some level of assertiveness, but one that is careful about elites´ preferences and those of the mass public and opinion leaders. I use the institutional fragile Argentine Supreme Court to test the model, as it decided several SDRs in the early 2000s.Fil: Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de Tucuman. Facultad de Derecho y Cs.sociales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; ArgentinaOxford University Press2022-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/239195Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel; Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America; Oxford University Press; International Journal of Constitutional Law; 20; 2; 4-2022; 696-7321474-2659CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/20/2/696/6658108info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/icon/moac044info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:21:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239195instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:21:14.802CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America |
title |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America |
spellingShingle |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel JUDICIAL POLITICS PUBLIC LAW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW STRUCTURAL REMEDIES |
title_short |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America |
title_full |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America |
title_fullStr |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America |
title_sort |
Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel |
author |
Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel |
author_facet |
Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
JUDICIAL POLITICS PUBLIC LAW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW STRUCTURAL REMEDIES |
topic |
JUDICIAL POLITICS PUBLIC LAW CONSTITUTIONAL LAW STRUCTURAL REMEDIES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Intense forms of judicial activism have emerged in Latin American in the last three decades. Judges dictated Structural Remedies Decisions (SRDs) ordering to create, design, and implement public policies to redress structural human rights violations; and implementing permanent judicial monitoring of the policy process. In a region marked by judicial instability, SRDs are risky options for judges. They can be seen as strong challenges to government and, thus, prompt retaliation. They can also damage judges´ reputation as they might be strongly criticized by influential conservative groups of society opposing progressive structural reforms.What drives judges to pursue or avoid this kind of risky activism? I propose the Equilibrist Approach, an alternative model to standard accounts explaining judicial behavior in Latin America. It incorporates the legitimacy building dimension of the strategic game and predicts some level of assertiveness, but one that is careful about elites´ preferences and those of the mass public and opinion leaders. I use the institutional fragile Argentine Supreme Court to test the model, as it decided several SDRs in the early 2000s. Fil: Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel. Universidad Nacional de Tucuman. Facultad de Derecho y Cs.sociales; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán; Argentina |
description |
Intense forms of judicial activism have emerged in Latin American in the last three decades. Judges dictated Structural Remedies Decisions (SRDs) ordering to create, design, and implement public policies to redress structural human rights violations; and implementing permanent judicial monitoring of the policy process. In a region marked by judicial instability, SRDs are risky options for judges. They can be seen as strong challenges to government and, thus, prompt retaliation. They can also damage judges´ reputation as they might be strongly criticized by influential conservative groups of society opposing progressive structural reforms.What drives judges to pursue or avoid this kind of risky activism? I propose the Equilibrist Approach, an alternative model to standard accounts explaining judicial behavior in Latin America. It incorporates the legitimacy building dimension of the strategic game and predicts some level of assertiveness, but one that is careful about elites´ preferences and those of the mass public and opinion leaders. I use the institutional fragile Argentine Supreme Court to test the model, as it decided several SDRs in the early 2000s. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239195 Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel; Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America; Oxford University Press; International Journal of Constitutional Law; 20; 2; 4-2022; 696-732 1474-2659 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239195 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pereira, Jose Roberto Gabriel; Judges as equilibrists: Explaining judicial activism in Latin America; Oxford University Press; International Journal of Constitutional Law; 20; 2; 4-2022; 696-732 1474-2659 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/20/2/696/6658108 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/icon/moac044 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614200114020352 |
score |
13.069144 |