Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia

Autores
Franco, Nora Viviana
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different human groups. These groups take decisions which involve their own background and choices, which are related to the knowledge and distribution of resources, as well as to the existence of neighbors and symbolic aspects. Technological and raw material Information is transmitted through different ways along the life of different individuals. Variations in the way information is transmitted have been found out between people living close to each other. The question this paper deals with the possibility of their recognition. Can we, as archaeologists, be able to rec-ognize them, specially taking into account the cumulative nature of the archaeological record and the equifinality problems which are so frequent? The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different hu-man groups. Here we will focus on one case from the South of the Upper Santa Cruz river basin, South Patagonia, dated to the Late Holocene, which will be compared with other ex-amples from more to the south and north. We focus on technological, raw material and use-life variations in the more frequent tool types -endscrapers, side scrapers and knifes- and cores, as well as blanks which provide technological information. The pattern found out can be related to differences in information transmission between different tool types, but addition information is needed. To the north, the existence of higher variation in raw material availability as well as a more incomplete knowledge of the regional archaeological record do not allow, by the moment, to discuss these aspects.We believe that a good knowledge of the regional archaeological record and an under-standing of the regional lithic structure are essential to begin to discuss if the patterns we find out can be related to specific transmission and residence patterns, as well as to begin to understand if some choices can be related to symbolic aspects. The pos-sibility of the recognition of these patterns will also be related to the variability within the regional lithic structure.
Fil: Franco, Nora Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina
Rock and Roll: 13th International Symposium on Knappable Materials
Tarragona
España
Institut Catalá de Paleoecología Humana
Centres de Recerca de Catalunya
Excelencia María de Maetzu
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Universitat Romira
Madrid Institute for Advance Study
Materia
HUNTER-GATHERERS
PATAGONIA
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION
LITHICS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193612

id CONICETDig_6f25accd69984c5932578bde76c752af
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193612
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from PatagoniaFranco, Nora VivianaHUNTER-GATHERERSPATAGONIAINFORMATION TRANSMISSIONLITHICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different human groups. These groups take decisions which involve their own background and choices, which are related to the knowledge and distribution of resources, as well as to the existence of neighbors and symbolic aspects. Technological and raw material Information is transmitted through different ways along the life of different individuals. Variations in the way information is transmitted have been found out between people living close to each other. The question this paper deals with the possibility of their recognition. Can we, as archaeologists, be able to rec-ognize them, specially taking into account the cumulative nature of the archaeological record and the equifinality problems which are so frequent? The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different hu-man groups. Here we will focus on one case from the South of the Upper Santa Cruz river basin, South Patagonia, dated to the Late Holocene, which will be compared with other ex-amples from more to the south and north. We focus on technological, raw material and use-life variations in the more frequent tool types -endscrapers, side scrapers and knifes- and cores, as well as blanks which provide technological information. The pattern found out can be related to differences in information transmission between different tool types, but addition information is needed. To the north, the existence of higher variation in raw material availability as well as a more incomplete knowledge of the regional archaeological record do not allow, by the moment, to discuss these aspects.We believe that a good knowledge of the regional archaeological record and an under-standing of the regional lithic structure are essential to begin to discuss if the patterns we find out can be related to specific transmission and residence patterns, as well as to begin to understand if some choices can be related to symbolic aspects. The pos-sibility of the recognition of these patterns will also be related to the variability within the regional lithic structure.Fil: Franco, Nora Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; ArgentinaRock and Roll: 13th International Symposium on Knappable MaterialsTarragonaEspañaInstitut Catalá de Paleoecología HumanaCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaExcelencia María de MaetzuAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónUniversitat RomiraMadrid Institute for Advance StudyInstitut Catalá de Paleoecología HumanaGómez de Soler, BrunoSoto, MaríaChacón, M. GemaSoares Remiseiros, Miguel2021info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectSimposioBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/193612Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia; Rock and Roll: 13th International Symposium on Knappable Materials; Tarragona; España; 2021; 214-214CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://wwwa.fundacio.urv.cat/congressos/public/cng_media/ISKM2021/13thISKM_PROGRAM.pdfInternacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/193612instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:14.518CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
title Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
spellingShingle Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
Franco, Nora Viviana
HUNTER-GATHERERS
PATAGONIA
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION
LITHICS
title_short Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
title_full Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
title_fullStr Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
title_full_unstemmed Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
title_sort Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Franco, Nora Viviana
author Franco, Nora Viviana
author_facet Franco, Nora Viviana
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Gómez de Soler, Bruno
Soto, María
Chacón, M. Gema
Soares Remiseiros, Miguel
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv HUNTER-GATHERERS
PATAGONIA
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION
LITHICS
topic HUNTER-GATHERERS
PATAGONIA
INFORMATION TRANSMISSION
LITHICS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different human groups. These groups take decisions which involve their own background and choices, which are related to the knowledge and distribution of resources, as well as to the existence of neighbors and symbolic aspects. Technological and raw material Information is transmitted through different ways along the life of different individuals. Variations in the way information is transmitted have been found out between people living close to each other. The question this paper deals with the possibility of their recognition. Can we, as archaeologists, be able to rec-ognize them, specially taking into account the cumulative nature of the archaeological record and the equifinality problems which are so frequent? The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different hu-man groups. Here we will focus on one case from the South of the Upper Santa Cruz river basin, South Patagonia, dated to the Late Holocene, which will be compared with other ex-amples from more to the south and north. We focus on technological, raw material and use-life variations in the more frequent tool types -endscrapers, side scrapers and knifes- and cores, as well as blanks which provide technological information. The pattern found out can be related to differences in information transmission between different tool types, but addition information is needed. To the north, the existence of higher variation in raw material availability as well as a more incomplete knowledge of the regional archaeological record do not allow, by the moment, to discuss these aspects.We believe that a good knowledge of the regional archaeological record and an under-standing of the regional lithic structure are essential to begin to discuss if the patterns we find out can be related to specific transmission and residence patterns, as well as to begin to understand if some choices can be related to symbolic aspects. The pos-sibility of the recognition of these patterns will also be related to the variability within the regional lithic structure.
Fil: Franco, Nora Viviana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas; Argentina
Rock and Roll: 13th International Symposium on Knappable Materials
Tarragona
España
Institut Catalá de Paleoecología Humana
Centres de Recerca de Catalunya
Excelencia María de Maetzu
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Universitat Romira
Madrid Institute for Advance Study
description The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different human groups. These groups take decisions which involve their own background and choices, which are related to the knowledge and distribution of resources, as well as to the existence of neighbors and symbolic aspects. Technological and raw material Information is transmitted through different ways along the life of different individuals. Variations in the way information is transmitted have been found out between people living close to each other. The question this paper deals with the possibility of their recognition. Can we, as archaeologists, be able to rec-ognize them, specially taking into account the cumulative nature of the archaeological record and the equifinality problems which are so frequent? The archaeological record is the product of successive human occupations, which can also involve different hu-man groups. Here we will focus on one case from the South of the Upper Santa Cruz river basin, South Patagonia, dated to the Late Holocene, which will be compared with other ex-amples from more to the south and north. We focus on technological, raw material and use-life variations in the more frequent tool types -endscrapers, side scrapers and knifes- and cores, as well as blanks which provide technological information. The pattern found out can be related to differences in information transmission between different tool types, but addition information is needed. To the north, the existence of higher variation in raw material availability as well as a more incomplete knowledge of the regional archaeological record do not allow, by the moment, to discuss these aspects.We believe that a good knowledge of the regional archaeological record and an under-standing of the regional lithic structure are essential to begin to discuss if the patterns we find out can be related to specific transmission and residence patterns, as well as to begin to understand if some choices can be related to symbolic aspects. The pos-sibility of the recognition of these patterns will also be related to the variability within the regional lithic structure.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Simposio
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/193612
Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia; Rock and Roll: 13th International Symposium on Knappable Materials; Tarragona; España; 2021; 214-214
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/193612
identifier_str_mv Is it possible to understand information transmission and residence patterns from the archaeological record? Some examples from Patagonia; Rock and Roll: 13th International Symposium on Knappable Materials; Tarragona; España; 2021; 214-214
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://wwwa.fundacio.urv.cat/congressos/public/cng_media/ISKM2021/13thISKM_PROGRAM.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institut Catalá de Paleoecología Humana
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Institut Catalá de Paleoecología Humana
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269210283081728
score 13.13397