The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies

Autores
Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra; Slipak, Ariel Martín
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Beyond the US-China watershed and supposedly polar state ideologies (liberal and pro-free- market in the US and dominated by state planning in China), this article delves into the shared traits of these powerful states. The US -at least since the Second World War- and China since 1978 share a systematic and highly oriented industrial policy directed to spur innovation in chosen sectors. In both cases, policies have been entangled with corporate interests and contribute to explaining the emergence of intellectual monopolies, precisely dominating each state’s privileged industries and technologies. Furthermore, each state’s geopolitical power relies on its respective intellectual monopolies. However, besides the support of each state, intellectual monopolies control global production and innovation networks constituting their own republics, which formally overlap with portions of different states. Intellectual monopolies also minimize their paid taxes while increasing wealth concentration. Contemporary capitalism is always on the brink of a global collapse as core states and intellectual monopolies are simultaneously friends and foes. We end this contribution with a preliminary analysis of these complexities.
Fil: Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas. Centro de Estudios sobre Población, Empleo y Desarrollo; Argentina. Universite de Paris; Francia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Slipak, Ariel Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Moreno; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Trade Wars after Coronavirus Economic, political and theoretical implications
Bristol
Reino Unido
World Economic Association
Materia
US-CHINA CONFLICT
CORPORATE POWER
POLITICAL POWER
INTELLECTUAL MONOPOLIES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155902
Acceder
id CONICETDig_6df1573c18e5c80b24175a3254e6047e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155902
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopoliesRikap, Cecilia AlejandraSlipak, Ariel MartínUS-CHINA CONFLICTCORPORATE POWERPOLITICAL POWERINTELLECTUAL MONOPOLIEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Beyond the US-China watershed and supposedly polar state ideologies (liberal and pro-free- market in the US and dominated by state planning in China), this article delves into the shared traits of these powerful states. The US -at least since the Second World War- and China since 1978 share a systematic and highly oriented industrial policy directed to spur innovation in chosen sectors. In both cases, policies have been entangled with corporate interests and contribute to explaining the emergence of intellectual monopolies, precisely dominating each state’s privileged industries and technologies. Furthermore, each state’s geopolitical power relies on its respective intellectual monopolies. However, besides the support of each state, intellectual monopolies control global production and innovation networks constituting their own republics, which formally overlap with portions of different states. Intellectual monopolies also minimize their paid taxes while increasing wealth concentration. Contemporary capitalism is always on the brink of a global collapse as core states and intellectual monopolies are simultaneously friends and foes. We end this contribution with a preliminary analysis of these complexities.Fil: Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas. Centro de Estudios sobre Población, Empleo y Desarrollo; Argentina. Universite de Paris; Francia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Slipak, Ariel Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Moreno; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaTrade Wars after Coronavirus Economic, political and theoretical implicationsBristolReino UnidoWorld Economic AssociationWorld Economic Association2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectConferenciaJournalhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/155902The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies; Trade Wars after Coronavirus Economic, political and theoretical implications; Bristol; Reino Unido; 2020; 1-20CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://tradewars2020.weaconferences.net/papers/the-interplays-of-us-china-and-their-intellectual-monopolies/Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:28:01Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155902instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:28:01.612CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
title The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
spellingShingle The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra
US-CHINA CONFLICT
CORPORATE POWER
POLITICAL POWER
INTELLECTUAL MONOPOLIES
title_short The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
title_full The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
title_fullStr The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
title_full_unstemmed The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
title_sort The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra
Slipak, Ariel Martín
author Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra
author_facet Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra
Slipak, Ariel Martín
author_role author
author2 Slipak, Ariel Martín
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv US-CHINA CONFLICT
CORPORATE POWER
POLITICAL POWER
INTELLECTUAL MONOPOLIES
topic US-CHINA CONFLICT
CORPORATE POWER
POLITICAL POWER
INTELLECTUAL MONOPOLIES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Beyond the US-China watershed and supposedly polar state ideologies (liberal and pro-free- market in the US and dominated by state planning in China), this article delves into the shared traits of these powerful states. The US -at least since the Second World War- and China since 1978 share a systematic and highly oriented industrial policy directed to spur innovation in chosen sectors. In both cases, policies have been entangled with corporate interests and contribute to explaining the emergence of intellectual monopolies, precisely dominating each state’s privileged industries and technologies. Furthermore, each state’s geopolitical power relies on its respective intellectual monopolies. However, besides the support of each state, intellectual monopolies control global production and innovation networks constituting their own republics, which formally overlap with portions of different states. Intellectual monopolies also minimize their paid taxes while increasing wealth concentration. Contemporary capitalism is always on the brink of a global collapse as core states and intellectual monopolies are simultaneously friends and foes. We end this contribution with a preliminary analysis of these complexities.
Fil: Rikap, Cecilia Alejandra. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas. Centro de Estudios sobre Población, Empleo y Desarrollo; Argentina. Universite de Paris; Francia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Slipak, Ariel Martín. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Moreno; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Trade Wars after Coronavirus Economic, political and theoretical implications
Bristol
Reino Unido
World Economic Association
description Beyond the US-China watershed and supposedly polar state ideologies (liberal and pro-free- market in the US and dominated by state planning in China), this article delves into the shared traits of these powerful states. The US -at least since the Second World War- and China since 1978 share a systematic and highly oriented industrial policy directed to spur innovation in chosen sectors. In both cases, policies have been entangled with corporate interests and contribute to explaining the emergence of intellectual monopolies, precisely dominating each state’s privileged industries and technologies. Furthermore, each state’s geopolitical power relies on its respective intellectual monopolies. However, besides the support of each state, intellectual monopolies control global production and innovation networks constituting their own republics, which formally overlap with portions of different states. Intellectual monopolies also minimize their paid taxes while increasing wealth concentration. Contemporary capitalism is always on the brink of a global collapse as core states and intellectual monopolies are simultaneously friends and foes. We end this contribution with a preliminary analysis of these complexities.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Conferencia
Journal
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155902
The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies; Trade Wars after Coronavirus Economic, political and theoretical implications; Bristol; Reino Unido; 2020; 1-20
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155902
identifier_str_mv The interplays of US, China and their intellectual monopolies; Trade Wars after Coronavirus Economic, political and theoretical implications; Bristol; Reino Unido; 2020; 1-20
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://tradewars2020.weaconferences.net/papers/the-interplays-of-us-china-and-their-intellectual-monopolies/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv World Economic Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv World Economic Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082740836892672
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares