We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances
- Autores
- Gargarella, Roberto
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism , dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based.
Fil: Gargarella, Roberto. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
social rights
checks and balances
deliberation
dialogic constitutionalism - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105071
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_6c85a410876abf7ab4302f285ed3ff93 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105071 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and BalancesGargarella, Robertosocial rightschecks and balancesdeliberationdialogic constitutionalismhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism , dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based.Fil: Gargarella, Roberto. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaOxford University Press2014-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/105071Gargarella, Roberto; We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances; Oxford University Press; Current Legal Problems; 67; 1; 8-2014; 1-472044-8422CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/clp/article-abstract/67/1/1/2259467?redirectedFrom=fulltextinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/clp/cuu008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:47:53Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/105071instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:47:54.204CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances |
title |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances |
spellingShingle |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances Gargarella, Roberto social rights checks and balances deliberation dialogic constitutionalism |
title_short |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances |
title_full |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances |
title_fullStr |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances |
title_full_unstemmed |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances |
title_sort |
We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gargarella, Roberto |
author |
Gargarella, Roberto |
author_facet |
Gargarella, Roberto |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
social rights checks and balances deliberation dialogic constitutionalism |
topic |
social rights checks and balances deliberation dialogic constitutionalism |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism , dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based. Fil: Gargarella, Roberto. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
All over the world, constitutional theory has been experiencing developments which have been studied under the rubric of dialogic constitutionalism , dialogic justice or dialogic judicial review. These novelties seem to have the capacity to challenge traditional ideas and assumptions concerning the system of separation of powers, the organization of checks and balances, and more particularly judicial review. This article critically assesses the recent development of this dialogic practice through examples mainly coming from Latin America. It maintains that, beside the genuine reasons we have to celebrate the coming of dialogic constitutionalism, we also have reasons for concern, particularly if we are not willing to modify the basic structure of the system of checks and balances on which it is usually based. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/105071 Gargarella, Roberto; We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances; Oxford University Press; Current Legal Problems; 67; 1; 8-2014; 1-47 2044-8422 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/105071 |
identifier_str_mv |
Gargarella, Roberto; We the People Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances; Oxford University Press; Current Legal Problems; 67; 1; 8-2014; 1-47 2044-8422 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/clp/article-abstract/67/1/1/2259467?redirectedFrom=fulltext info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/clp/cuu008 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268888656510976 |
score |
13.13397 |