A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings

Autores
Pessana, Franco Martin; Sanchez, Ramiro; Lev, Gustavo; Mirada, Micaela; Mendiz, Oscar; Ramírez, Agustín José; Cabrera Fischer, Edmundo Ignacio
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Introduction: It has been demonstrated that the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood pressure has a prognostic value but limited by the inaccuracy linked to technical errors and a differences in the pressure wave analysis.Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to validate the non-invasively central blood pressure waveforms obtained with an oscillometic device, with those recorded by intra-arterial measurements at the aortic level.Methods: In this study were included 20 subjects, 10 males (68 ± 12-years-old, BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 Kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8-years-old, BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 Kg/m2). The analysed cohort was composed of patients with diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invasive and non-invasive dataused in this research were previously analysed using a widely reported methodology and published by our group.The invasive aortic pressure recording was synchronically acquired with an oscillometric brachial acquisition and, then a reconstruction of central pressure wave was performed.In this research a correlation analysis using the entire aortic pressure cycle was performed.Results: Coefficient values found of the whole population, using the entire aortic pressure cycle, were similar to those obtained using the mean value of the cBP cardiac cycle was analysed (0.88 versus 0.89; respectively). On the contrary, the slope of the regression line determined by invasiveversus non-invasive cBP loops (n = 20) using the entire cBP cycle exhibit a remarkable decrease with respect to that obtained using the mean aortic pressure cycle (0.98 versus 0.77).Conclusions: In a first step, applying an interpolation procedure by means of oversampling and digital low pass filter, we found a high correlation between invasive and noninvasive instantaneous aortic pressure waveforms in: Men, women and the whole population, In a second step, resultsin terms of correlation coefficient and the slope derived from the regression analysis of invasive and non-invasive using a new data analysis allow to confirm high correlation coefficients and a more realistic slope value of the invasive versus non-invasive pressure wave relationship.
Fil: Pessana, Franco Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Sanchez, Ramiro. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Lev, Gustavo. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Mirada, Micaela. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Mendiz, Oscar. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Ramírez, Agustín José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Cabrera Fischer, Edmundo Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
Materia
CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE
MOBIL-O-GRAPH
BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE
AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211583

id CONICETDig_67234a6e18214d43b78b71f4c5431200
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211583
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human BeingsPessana, Franco MartinSanchez, RamiroLev, GustavoMirada, MicaelaMendiz, OscarRamírez, Agustín JoséCabrera Fischer, Edmundo IgnacioCENTRAL BLOOD PRESSUREMOBIL-O-GRAPHBRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSUREAORTIC BLOOD PRESSUREhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Introduction: It has been demonstrated that the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood pressure has a prognostic value but limited by the inaccuracy linked to technical errors and a differences in the pressure wave analysis.Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to validate the non-invasively central blood pressure waveforms obtained with an oscillometic device, with those recorded by intra-arterial measurements at the aortic level.Methods: In this study were included 20 subjects, 10 males (68 ± 12-years-old, BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 Kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8-years-old, BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 Kg/m2). The analysed cohort was composed of patients with diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invasive and non-invasive dataused in this research were previously analysed using a widely reported methodology and published by our group.The invasive aortic pressure recording was synchronically acquired with an oscillometric brachial acquisition and, then a reconstruction of central pressure wave was performed.In this research a correlation analysis using the entire aortic pressure cycle was performed.Results: Coefficient values found of the whole population, using the entire aortic pressure cycle, were similar to those obtained using the mean value of the cBP cardiac cycle was analysed (0.88 versus 0.89; respectively). On the contrary, the slope of the regression line determined by invasiveversus non-invasive cBP loops (n = 20) using the entire cBP cycle exhibit a remarkable decrease with respect to that obtained using the mean aortic pressure cycle (0.98 versus 0.77).Conclusions: In a first step, applying an interpolation procedure by means of oversampling and digital low pass filter, we found a high correlation between invasive and noninvasive instantaneous aortic pressure waveforms in: Men, women and the whole population, In a second step, resultsin terms of correlation coefficient and the slope derived from the regression analysis of invasive and non-invasive using a new data analysis allow to confirm high correlation coefficients and a more realistic slope value of the invasive versus non-invasive pressure wave relationship.Fil: Pessana, Franco Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; ArgentinaFil: Sanchez, Ramiro. Fundación Favaloro; ArgentinaFil: Lev, Gustavo. Fundación Favaloro; ArgentinaFil: Mirada, Micaela. Fundación Favaloro; ArgentinaFil: Mendiz, Oscar. Fundación Favaloro; ArgentinaFil: Ramírez, Agustín José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; ArgentinaFil: Cabrera Fischer, Edmundo Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; ArgentinaClinMed International Library2021-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/211583Pessana, Franco Martin; Sanchez, Ramiro; Lev, Gustavo; Mirada, Micaela; Mendiz, Oscar; et al.; A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings; ClinMed International Library; Journal of Hypertension and Management; 7; 1; 6-2021; 1-92474-3690CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.23937/2474-3690/1510064info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:10:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211583instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:10:40.118CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
title A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
spellingShingle A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
Pessana, Franco Martin
CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE
MOBIL-O-GRAPH
BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE
AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE
title_short A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
title_full A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
title_fullStr A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
title_full_unstemmed A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
title_sort A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pessana, Franco Martin
Sanchez, Ramiro
Lev, Gustavo
Mirada, Micaela
Mendiz, Oscar
Ramírez, Agustín José
Cabrera Fischer, Edmundo Ignacio
author Pessana, Franco Martin
author_facet Pessana, Franco Martin
Sanchez, Ramiro
Lev, Gustavo
Mirada, Micaela
Mendiz, Oscar
Ramírez, Agustín José
Cabrera Fischer, Edmundo Ignacio
author_role author
author2 Sanchez, Ramiro
Lev, Gustavo
Mirada, Micaela
Mendiz, Oscar
Ramírez, Agustín José
Cabrera Fischer, Edmundo Ignacio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE
MOBIL-O-GRAPH
BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE
AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE
topic CENTRAL BLOOD PRESSURE
MOBIL-O-GRAPH
BRACHIAL BLOOD PRESSURE
AORTIC BLOOD PRESSURE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Introduction: It has been demonstrated that the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood pressure has a prognostic value but limited by the inaccuracy linked to technical errors and a differences in the pressure wave analysis.Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to validate the non-invasively central blood pressure waveforms obtained with an oscillometic device, with those recorded by intra-arterial measurements at the aortic level.Methods: In this study were included 20 subjects, 10 males (68 ± 12-years-old, BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 Kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8-years-old, BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 Kg/m2). The analysed cohort was composed of patients with diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invasive and non-invasive dataused in this research were previously analysed using a widely reported methodology and published by our group.The invasive aortic pressure recording was synchronically acquired with an oscillometric brachial acquisition and, then a reconstruction of central pressure wave was performed.In this research a correlation analysis using the entire aortic pressure cycle was performed.Results: Coefficient values found of the whole population, using the entire aortic pressure cycle, were similar to those obtained using the mean value of the cBP cardiac cycle was analysed (0.88 versus 0.89; respectively). On the contrary, the slope of the regression line determined by invasiveversus non-invasive cBP loops (n = 20) using the entire cBP cycle exhibit a remarkable decrease with respect to that obtained using the mean aortic pressure cycle (0.98 versus 0.77).Conclusions: In a first step, applying an interpolation procedure by means of oversampling and digital low pass filter, we found a high correlation between invasive and noninvasive instantaneous aortic pressure waveforms in: Men, women and the whole population, In a second step, resultsin terms of correlation coefficient and the slope derived from the regression analysis of invasive and non-invasive using a new data analysis allow to confirm high correlation coefficients and a more realistic slope value of the invasive versus non-invasive pressure wave relationship.
Fil: Pessana, Franco Martin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Sanchez, Ramiro. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Lev, Gustavo. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Mirada, Micaela. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Mendiz, Oscar. Fundación Favaloro; Argentina
Fil: Ramírez, Agustín José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
Fil: Cabrera Fischer, Edmundo Ignacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería. Fundación Favaloro. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional, Trasplante y Bioingeniería; Argentina
description Introduction: It has been demonstrated that the noninvasive evaluation of aortic blood pressure has a prognostic value but limited by the inaccuracy linked to technical errors and a differences in the pressure wave analysis.Aims: The aim of this study was to compare two methods used to validate the non-invasively central blood pressure waveforms obtained with an oscillometic device, with those recorded by intra-arterial measurements at the aortic level.Methods: In this study were included 20 subjects, 10 males (68 ± 12-years-old, BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 Kg/m2) and 10 females (77 ± 8-years-old, BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 Kg/m2). The analysed cohort was composed of patients with diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invasive and non-invasive dataused in this research were previously analysed using a widely reported methodology and published by our group.The invasive aortic pressure recording was synchronically acquired with an oscillometric brachial acquisition and, then a reconstruction of central pressure wave was performed.In this research a correlation analysis using the entire aortic pressure cycle was performed.Results: Coefficient values found of the whole population, using the entire aortic pressure cycle, were similar to those obtained using the mean value of the cBP cardiac cycle was analysed (0.88 versus 0.89; respectively). On the contrary, the slope of the regression line determined by invasiveversus non-invasive cBP loops (n = 20) using the entire cBP cycle exhibit a remarkable decrease with respect to that obtained using the mean aortic pressure cycle (0.98 versus 0.77).Conclusions: In a first step, applying an interpolation procedure by means of oversampling and digital low pass filter, we found a high correlation between invasive and noninvasive instantaneous aortic pressure waveforms in: Men, women and the whole population, In a second step, resultsin terms of correlation coefficient and the slope derived from the regression analysis of invasive and non-invasive using a new data analysis allow to confirm high correlation coefficients and a more realistic slope value of the invasive versus non-invasive pressure wave relationship.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/211583
Pessana, Franco Martin; Sanchez, Ramiro; Lev, Gustavo; Mirada, Micaela; Mendiz, Oscar; et al.; A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings; ClinMed International Library; Journal of Hypertension and Management; 7; 1; 6-2021; 1-9
2474-3690
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/211583
identifier_str_mv Pessana, Franco Martin; Sanchez, Ramiro; Lev, Gustavo; Mirada, Micaela; Mendiz, Oscar; et al.; A New Approach to Validate the Use of Brachial Blood Pressure to Assess Non-Invasive Aortic Pressure in Human Beings; ClinMed International Library; Journal of Hypertension and Management; 7; 1; 6-2021; 1-9
2474-3690
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.23937/2474-3690/1510064
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ClinMed International Library
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ClinMed International Library
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270129032790016
score 13.13397