Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved?
- Autores
- Echave, Julian
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Proteins fluctuate, and such fluctuations are functionally important. As with any functionally relevant trait, it is interesting to study how fluctuations change during evolution. In contrast with sequence and structure, the study of the evolution of protein motions is much more recent. Yet, it has been shown that the overall fluctuation pattern is evolutionarily conserved. Moreover, the lowest-energy normal modes have been found to be the most conserved. The reasons behind such a differential conservation have not been explicitly studied. There are two limiting explanations. A "biological"explanation is that because such modes are functional, there is natural selection pressure against their variation. An alternative "physical" explanation is that the lowest-energy normal modes may be more conserved because they are just more robust with respect to random mutations. To investigate this issue, I studied a set of globin-like proteins using a perturbed elastic network model (ENM) of the effect of random mutations on normal modes. I show that the conservation predicted by the model is in excellent agreement with observations. These results support the physical explanation: the lowest normal modes are more conserved because they are more robust.
Fil: Echave, Julian. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
CHEMICAL PHYSICS
COMPUTER MODELING
MOLECULAR DYNAMICS
NORMAL MODES
PROTEIN DYNAMICS
PROTEIN EVOLUTION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195117
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_6610115f0564569d634d6ef6b2611f20 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195117 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved?Echave, JulianCHEMICAL PHYSICSCOMPUTER MODELINGMOLECULAR DYNAMICSNORMAL MODESPROTEIN DYNAMICSPROTEIN EVOLUTIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Proteins fluctuate, and such fluctuations are functionally important. As with any functionally relevant trait, it is interesting to study how fluctuations change during evolution. In contrast with sequence and structure, the study of the evolution of protein motions is much more recent. Yet, it has been shown that the overall fluctuation pattern is evolutionarily conserved. Moreover, the lowest-energy normal modes have been found to be the most conserved. The reasons behind such a differential conservation have not been explicitly studied. There are two limiting explanations. A "biological"explanation is that because such modes are functional, there is natural selection pressure against their variation. An alternative "physical" explanation is that the lowest-energy normal modes may be more conserved because they are just more robust with respect to random mutations. To investigate this issue, I studied a set of globin-like proteins using a perturbed elastic network model (ENM) of the effect of random mutations on normal modes. I show that the conservation predicted by the model is in excellent agreement with observations. These results support the physical explanation: the lowest normal modes are more conserved because they are more robust.Fil: Echave, Julian. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaInt Union Pure Applied Chemistry2012-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/195117Echave, Julian; Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved?; Int Union Pure Applied Chemistry; Pure and Applied Chemistry; 84; 9; 2-2012; 1931-19370033-4545CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1351/PAC-CON-12-02-15info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1351/PAC-CON-12-02-15/htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:28:26Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195117instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:28:26.522CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? |
title |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? |
spellingShingle |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? Echave, Julian CHEMICAL PHYSICS COMPUTER MODELING MOLECULAR DYNAMICS NORMAL MODES PROTEIN DYNAMICS PROTEIN EVOLUTION |
title_short |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? |
title_full |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? |
title_fullStr |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? |
title_sort |
Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Echave, Julian |
author |
Echave, Julian |
author_facet |
Echave, Julian |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CHEMICAL PHYSICS COMPUTER MODELING MOLECULAR DYNAMICS NORMAL MODES PROTEIN DYNAMICS PROTEIN EVOLUTION |
topic |
CHEMICAL PHYSICS COMPUTER MODELING MOLECULAR DYNAMICS NORMAL MODES PROTEIN DYNAMICS PROTEIN EVOLUTION |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Proteins fluctuate, and such fluctuations are functionally important. As with any functionally relevant trait, it is interesting to study how fluctuations change during evolution. In contrast with sequence and structure, the study of the evolution of protein motions is much more recent. Yet, it has been shown that the overall fluctuation pattern is evolutionarily conserved. Moreover, the lowest-energy normal modes have been found to be the most conserved. The reasons behind such a differential conservation have not been explicitly studied. There are two limiting explanations. A "biological"explanation is that because such modes are functional, there is natural selection pressure against their variation. An alternative "physical" explanation is that the lowest-energy normal modes may be more conserved because they are just more robust with respect to random mutations. To investigate this issue, I studied a set of globin-like proteins using a perturbed elastic network model (ENM) of the effect of random mutations on normal modes. I show that the conservation predicted by the model is in excellent agreement with observations. These results support the physical explanation: the lowest normal modes are more conserved because they are more robust. Fil: Echave, Julian. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Proteins fluctuate, and such fluctuations are functionally important. As with any functionally relevant trait, it is interesting to study how fluctuations change during evolution. In contrast with sequence and structure, the study of the evolution of protein motions is much more recent. Yet, it has been shown that the overall fluctuation pattern is evolutionarily conserved. Moreover, the lowest-energy normal modes have been found to be the most conserved. The reasons behind such a differential conservation have not been explicitly studied. There are two limiting explanations. A "biological"explanation is that because such modes are functional, there is natural selection pressure against their variation. An alternative "physical" explanation is that the lowest-energy normal modes may be more conserved because they are just more robust with respect to random mutations. To investigate this issue, I studied a set of globin-like proteins using a perturbed elastic network model (ENM) of the effect of random mutations on normal modes. I show that the conservation predicted by the model is in excellent agreement with observations. These results support the physical explanation: the lowest normal modes are more conserved because they are more robust. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195117 Echave, Julian; Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved?; Int Union Pure Applied Chemistry; Pure and Applied Chemistry; 84; 9; 2-2012; 1931-1937 0033-4545 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195117 |
identifier_str_mv |
Echave, Julian; Why are the low-energy protein normal modes evolutionarily conserved?; Int Union Pure Applied Chemistry; Pure and Applied Chemistry; 84; 9; 2-2012; 1931-1937 0033-4545 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1351/PAC-CON-12-02-15 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1351/PAC-CON-12-02-15/html |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Int Union Pure Applied Chemistry |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Int Union Pure Applied Chemistry |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614288022437888 |
score |
13.070432 |