Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions

Autores
Vigliecca, Nora Silvana; Peñalva, Marisa Carola; Molina, Silvia Cristina; Voos, Javier
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Introduction: Aphasia tests validated according to the brain injury side are necessary, especially for Spanish instruments. Objectives: To study the concurrent validity of this Brief Aphasia Evaluation (BAE) to differentiate patients with left cerebral lesions (LC) from patients with right cerebral lesions (RC) as well as LC from healthy participants (HP). To study, through an unrestricted-sub-test-factor analysis, the BAE conceptual and content validity to generate a verbal homogeneous construct. Materials and methods: Data were obtained from a sample of 109 right-handed volunteers: 37 LC, 34 RC and 38 HP. The three groups were matched according to gender, age and education. Results: Both groups of patients were similar in type and site of lesion, time since onset of condition, risk factors, presence of hemianopsia and hemiparesis and number of hospital visits. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient indicated an internal consistency of 0.99 for the total score and 0.88 or above for any of the sub-tests. All sub-tests (with loadings of 0.65 or above) grouped in one factor which explained 78% of the variance. The BAE showed a sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 or above to identify the LC (median as cut-off point). Conclusions: This test of free distribution demonstrated a satisfactory validity.
Fil: Vigliecca, Nora Silvana. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Peñalva, Marisa Carola. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina
Fil: Molina, Silvia Cristina. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina
Fil: Voos, Javier. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba; Argentina
Materia
Aphasia Screening Test
Dementia
Differential Diagnosis
Factor Analysis
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/24869
Acceder
id CONICETDig_5c551e187ae205961dcde9ae7845dd88
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/24869
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesionsVigliecca, Nora SilvanaPeñalva, Marisa CarolaMolina, Silvia CristinaVoos, JavierAphasia Screening TestDementiaDifferential DiagnosisFactor Analysishttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Introduction: Aphasia tests validated according to the brain injury side are necessary, especially for Spanish instruments. Objectives: To study the concurrent validity of this Brief Aphasia Evaluation (BAE) to differentiate patients with left cerebral lesions (LC) from patients with right cerebral lesions (RC) as well as LC from healthy participants (HP). To study, through an unrestricted-sub-test-factor analysis, the BAE conceptual and content validity to generate a verbal homogeneous construct. Materials and methods: Data were obtained from a sample of 109 right-handed volunteers: 37 LC, 34 RC and 38 HP. The three groups were matched according to gender, age and education. Results: Both groups of patients were similar in type and site of lesion, time since onset of condition, risk factors, presence of hemianopsia and hemiparesis and number of hospital visits. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient indicated an internal consistency of 0.99 for the total score and 0.88 or above for any of the sub-tests. All sub-tests (with loadings of 0.65 or above) grouped in one factor which explained 78% of the variance. The BAE showed a sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 or above to identify the LC (median as cut-off point). Conclusions: This test of free distribution demonstrated a satisfactory validity.Fil: Vigliecca, Nora Silvana. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Peñalva, Marisa Carola. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; ArgentinaFil: Molina, Silvia Cristina. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; ArgentinaFil: Voos, Javier. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba; ArgentinaTaylor & Francis2011-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/24869Vigliecca, Nora Silvana; Peñalva, Marisa Carola; Molina, Silvia Cristina; Voos, Javier; Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions; Taylor & Francis; Brain Injury; 25; 4; 2-2011; 394-4000269-9052CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3109/02699052.2011.556106info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/02699052.2011.556106info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:44:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/24869instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:44:09.697CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
title Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
spellingShingle Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
Vigliecca, Nora Silvana
Aphasia Screening Test
Dementia
Differential Diagnosis
Factor Analysis
title_short Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
title_full Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
title_fullStr Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
title_full_unstemmed Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
title_sort Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vigliecca, Nora Silvana
Peñalva, Marisa Carola
Molina, Silvia Cristina
Voos, Javier
author Vigliecca, Nora Silvana
author_facet Vigliecca, Nora Silvana
Peñalva, Marisa Carola
Molina, Silvia Cristina
Voos, Javier
author_role author
author2 Peñalva, Marisa Carola
Molina, Silvia Cristina
Voos, Javier
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Aphasia Screening Test
Dementia
Differential Diagnosis
Factor Analysis
topic Aphasia Screening Test
Dementia
Differential Diagnosis
Factor Analysis
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Introduction: Aphasia tests validated according to the brain injury side are necessary, especially for Spanish instruments. Objectives: To study the concurrent validity of this Brief Aphasia Evaluation (BAE) to differentiate patients with left cerebral lesions (LC) from patients with right cerebral lesions (RC) as well as LC from healthy participants (HP). To study, through an unrestricted-sub-test-factor analysis, the BAE conceptual and content validity to generate a verbal homogeneous construct. Materials and methods: Data were obtained from a sample of 109 right-handed volunteers: 37 LC, 34 RC and 38 HP. The three groups were matched according to gender, age and education. Results: Both groups of patients were similar in type and site of lesion, time since onset of condition, risk factors, presence of hemianopsia and hemiparesis and number of hospital visits. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient indicated an internal consistency of 0.99 for the total score and 0.88 or above for any of the sub-tests. All sub-tests (with loadings of 0.65 or above) grouped in one factor which explained 78% of the variance. The BAE showed a sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 or above to identify the LC (median as cut-off point). Conclusions: This test of free distribution demonstrated a satisfactory validity.
Fil: Vigliecca, Nora Silvana. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Peñalva, Marisa Carola. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina
Fil: Molina, Silvia Cristina. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba. Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades; Argentina
Fil: Voos, Javier. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Córdoba; Argentina
description Introduction: Aphasia tests validated according to the brain injury side are necessary, especially for Spanish instruments. Objectives: To study the concurrent validity of this Brief Aphasia Evaluation (BAE) to differentiate patients with left cerebral lesions (LC) from patients with right cerebral lesions (RC) as well as LC from healthy participants (HP). To study, through an unrestricted-sub-test-factor analysis, the BAE conceptual and content validity to generate a verbal homogeneous construct. Materials and methods: Data were obtained from a sample of 109 right-handed volunteers: 37 LC, 34 RC and 38 HP. The three groups were matched according to gender, age and education. Results: Both groups of patients were similar in type and site of lesion, time since onset of condition, risk factors, presence of hemianopsia and hemiparesis and number of hospital visits. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient indicated an internal consistency of 0.99 for the total score and 0.88 or above for any of the sub-tests. All sub-tests (with loadings of 0.65 or above) grouped in one factor which explained 78% of the variance. The BAE showed a sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 or above to identify the LC (median as cut-off point). Conclusions: This test of free distribution demonstrated a satisfactory validity.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/24869
Vigliecca, Nora Silvana; Peñalva, Marisa Carola; Molina, Silvia Cristina; Voos, Javier; Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions; Taylor & Francis; Brain Injury; 25; 4; 2-2011; 394-400
0269-9052
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/24869
identifier_str_mv Vigliecca, Nora Silvana; Peñalva, Marisa Carola; Molina, Silvia Cristina; Voos, Javier; Brief aphasia evaluation (minimum verbal performance): concurrent and conceptual validity study in patients with unilateral cerebral lesions; Taylor & Francis; Brain Injury; 25; 4; 2-2011; 394-400
0269-9052
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3109/02699052.2011.556106
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/02699052.2011.556106
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613389766098944
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares