Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks

Autores
Chamberlain, Scott; Vazquez, Diego P.; Carvalheiro, Luisa; Elle, Elizabeth; Vamosi, Jaca C.
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Summary: Species community composition is known to alter the network of interactions between two trophic levels, potentially affecting its functioning (e.g. plant pollination success) and the stability of communities. Phylogenies vary in shape with regard to the rate of evolutionary change across a tree (influencing tree balance) and variation in the timing of branching events (affecting the distribution of node ages in trees), both of which may influence the structure of species interaction networks. Because related species are likely to share many of the traits that regulate interactions, the shape of phylogenetic trees may provide some insights into the distribution of traits within communities, and hence the likelihood of interaction among species. However, little attention has been paid to the potential effects of changes in phylogenetic diversity (PD) on interaction networks. Phylogenetic diversity is influenced by species diversity within a community, but also how distantly-related the constituent species are from one another. Here, we evaluate the relationship between two important measures of phylogenetic diversity (tree shape and age of nodes) and the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks using empirical and simulated data. Whereas the former allows us to evaluate patterns in real communities, the latter allows us to evaluate more systematically the relationship between tree shape and network structure under three different models of trait evolution. In empirical networks, less balanced plant phylogenies were associated with lower connectance in interaction networks indicating that communities with the descendants of recent radiations are more diverged and specialized in their partnerships. In simulations, tree balance and the distribution of nodes through time were included in the best models for modularity, and the second best models for connectance and nestedness. In models assuming random evolutionary change through time (i.e. Brownian motion), less balanced trees and trees with nodes near the tips exhibited greater modularity, whereas in models with an early burst of radiation followed by relative stasis (i.e. early-burst models) more balanced trees and trees with nodes near roots had greater modularity. Synthesis. Overall, these results suggest that the shape of phylogenies can influence the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks. However, the mismatch between simulations and empirical data indicate that no simple model of trait evolution mimics that observed in real communities.
Fil: Chamberlain, Scott. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Vazquez, Diego P.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Carvalheiro, Luisa. University Of Leeds; Reino Unido. Naturalis Biodiversity Center; Países Bajos
Fil: Elle, Elizabeth. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Vamosi, Jaca C.. University of Calgary; Canadá
Materia
CONNECTANCE
DIVERSITY
MODULARITY
NESTEDNESS
NETWORK STRUCTURE
PHYLOGENY IMBALANCE
PLANT POPULATION AND COMMUNITY DYNAMICS
PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92561

id CONICETDig_5c09f4b3c8ded007c6bbbcd73991f315
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92561
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networksChamberlain, ScottVazquez, Diego P.Carvalheiro, LuisaElle, ElizabethVamosi, Jaca C.CONNECTANCEDIVERSITYMODULARITYNESTEDNESSNETWORK STRUCTUREPHYLOGENY IMBALANCEPLANT POPULATION AND COMMUNITY DYNAMICSPLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Summary: Species community composition is known to alter the network of interactions between two trophic levels, potentially affecting its functioning (e.g. plant pollination success) and the stability of communities. Phylogenies vary in shape with regard to the rate of evolutionary change across a tree (influencing tree balance) and variation in the timing of branching events (affecting the distribution of node ages in trees), both of which may influence the structure of species interaction networks. Because related species are likely to share many of the traits that regulate interactions, the shape of phylogenetic trees may provide some insights into the distribution of traits within communities, and hence the likelihood of interaction among species. However, little attention has been paid to the potential effects of changes in phylogenetic diversity (PD) on interaction networks. Phylogenetic diversity is influenced by species diversity within a community, but also how distantly-related the constituent species are from one another. Here, we evaluate the relationship between two important measures of phylogenetic diversity (tree shape and age of nodes) and the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks using empirical and simulated data. Whereas the former allows us to evaluate patterns in real communities, the latter allows us to evaluate more systematically the relationship between tree shape and network structure under three different models of trait evolution. In empirical networks, less balanced plant phylogenies were associated with lower connectance in interaction networks indicating that communities with the descendants of recent radiations are more diverged and specialized in their partnerships. In simulations, tree balance and the distribution of nodes through time were included in the best models for modularity, and the second best models for connectance and nestedness. In models assuming random evolutionary change through time (i.e. Brownian motion), less balanced trees and trees with nodes near the tips exhibited greater modularity, whereas in models with an early burst of radiation followed by relative stasis (i.e. early-burst models) more balanced trees and trees with nodes near roots had greater modularity. Synthesis. Overall, these results suggest that the shape of phylogenies can influence the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks. However, the mismatch between simulations and empirical data indicate that no simple model of trait evolution mimics that observed in real communities.Fil: Chamberlain, Scott. University Fraser Simon; CanadáFil: Vazquez, Diego P.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Carvalheiro, Luisa. University Of Leeds; Reino Unido. Naturalis Biodiversity Center; Países BajosFil: Elle, Elizabeth. University Fraser Simon; CanadáFil: Vamosi, Jaca C.. University of Calgary; CanadáWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2014-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/92561Chamberlain, Scott; Vazquez, Diego P.; Carvalheiro, Luisa; Elle, Elizabeth; Vamosi, Jaca C.; Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal of Ecology; 102; 5; 6-2014; 1234-12430022-0477CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12293info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:46:05Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92561instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:46:05.928CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
title Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
spellingShingle Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
Chamberlain, Scott
CONNECTANCE
DIVERSITY
MODULARITY
NESTEDNESS
NETWORK STRUCTURE
PHYLOGENY IMBALANCE
PLANT POPULATION AND COMMUNITY DYNAMICS
PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS
title_short Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
title_full Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
title_fullStr Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
title_sort Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chamberlain, Scott
Vazquez, Diego P.
Carvalheiro, Luisa
Elle, Elizabeth
Vamosi, Jaca C.
author Chamberlain, Scott
author_facet Chamberlain, Scott
Vazquez, Diego P.
Carvalheiro, Luisa
Elle, Elizabeth
Vamosi, Jaca C.
author_role author
author2 Vazquez, Diego P.
Carvalheiro, Luisa
Elle, Elizabeth
Vamosi, Jaca C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CONNECTANCE
DIVERSITY
MODULARITY
NESTEDNESS
NETWORK STRUCTURE
PHYLOGENY IMBALANCE
PLANT POPULATION AND COMMUNITY DYNAMICS
PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS
topic CONNECTANCE
DIVERSITY
MODULARITY
NESTEDNESS
NETWORK STRUCTURE
PHYLOGENY IMBALANCE
PLANT POPULATION AND COMMUNITY DYNAMICS
PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Summary: Species community composition is known to alter the network of interactions between two trophic levels, potentially affecting its functioning (e.g. plant pollination success) and the stability of communities. Phylogenies vary in shape with regard to the rate of evolutionary change across a tree (influencing tree balance) and variation in the timing of branching events (affecting the distribution of node ages in trees), both of which may influence the structure of species interaction networks. Because related species are likely to share many of the traits that regulate interactions, the shape of phylogenetic trees may provide some insights into the distribution of traits within communities, and hence the likelihood of interaction among species. However, little attention has been paid to the potential effects of changes in phylogenetic diversity (PD) on interaction networks. Phylogenetic diversity is influenced by species diversity within a community, but also how distantly-related the constituent species are from one another. Here, we evaluate the relationship between two important measures of phylogenetic diversity (tree shape and age of nodes) and the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks using empirical and simulated data. Whereas the former allows us to evaluate patterns in real communities, the latter allows us to evaluate more systematically the relationship between tree shape and network structure under three different models of trait evolution. In empirical networks, less balanced plant phylogenies were associated with lower connectance in interaction networks indicating that communities with the descendants of recent radiations are more diverged and specialized in their partnerships. In simulations, tree balance and the distribution of nodes through time were included in the best models for modularity, and the second best models for connectance and nestedness. In models assuming random evolutionary change through time (i.e. Brownian motion), less balanced trees and trees with nodes near the tips exhibited greater modularity, whereas in models with an early burst of radiation followed by relative stasis (i.e. early-burst models) more balanced trees and trees with nodes near roots had greater modularity. Synthesis. Overall, these results suggest that the shape of phylogenies can influence the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks. However, the mismatch between simulations and empirical data indicate that no simple model of trait evolution mimics that observed in real communities.
Fil: Chamberlain, Scott. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Vazquez, Diego P.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Carvalheiro, Luisa. University Of Leeds; Reino Unido. Naturalis Biodiversity Center; Países Bajos
Fil: Elle, Elizabeth. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Vamosi, Jaca C.. University of Calgary; Canadá
description Summary: Species community composition is known to alter the network of interactions between two trophic levels, potentially affecting its functioning (e.g. plant pollination success) and the stability of communities. Phylogenies vary in shape with regard to the rate of evolutionary change across a tree (influencing tree balance) and variation in the timing of branching events (affecting the distribution of node ages in trees), both of which may influence the structure of species interaction networks. Because related species are likely to share many of the traits that regulate interactions, the shape of phylogenetic trees may provide some insights into the distribution of traits within communities, and hence the likelihood of interaction among species. However, little attention has been paid to the potential effects of changes in phylogenetic diversity (PD) on interaction networks. Phylogenetic diversity is influenced by species diversity within a community, but also how distantly-related the constituent species are from one another. Here, we evaluate the relationship between two important measures of phylogenetic diversity (tree shape and age of nodes) and the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks using empirical and simulated data. Whereas the former allows us to evaluate patterns in real communities, the latter allows us to evaluate more systematically the relationship between tree shape and network structure under three different models of trait evolution. In empirical networks, less balanced plant phylogenies were associated with lower connectance in interaction networks indicating that communities with the descendants of recent radiations are more diverged and specialized in their partnerships. In simulations, tree balance and the distribution of nodes through time were included in the best models for modularity, and the second best models for connectance and nestedness. In models assuming random evolutionary change through time (i.e. Brownian motion), less balanced trees and trees with nodes near the tips exhibited greater modularity, whereas in models with an early burst of radiation followed by relative stasis (i.e. early-burst models) more balanced trees and trees with nodes near roots had greater modularity. Synthesis. Overall, these results suggest that the shape of phylogenies can influence the structure of plant-pollinator interaction networks. However, the mismatch between simulations and empirical data indicate that no simple model of trait evolution mimics that observed in real communities.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92561
Chamberlain, Scott; Vazquez, Diego P.; Carvalheiro, Luisa; Elle, Elizabeth; Vamosi, Jaca C.; Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal of Ecology; 102; 5; 6-2014; 1234-1243
0022-0477
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92561
identifier_str_mv Chamberlain, Scott; Vazquez, Diego P.; Carvalheiro, Luisa; Elle, Elizabeth; Vamosi, Jaca C.; Phylogenetic tree shape and the structure of mutualistic networks; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Journal of Ecology; 102; 5; 6-2014; 1234-1243
0022-0477
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12293
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083559314423808
score 13.22299