Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico

Autores
Etchemendy, Sebastian; Puente. Ignacio
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In the early 1980s Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico had commercial banking sectors that were dominated by local banks. The largest countries in Latin America were subjected to common international economic pressures during both the neoliberal 1980s and 1990s – including the expansion of capital markets in the periphery and integration into the regional trade agreements NAFTA and Mercosur – and the post1998 financial turmoil. By 2015, however, the three countries had consolidated alternative commercial banking systems: domestic private group dominated (Brazil), mixed (i.e., ownership more evenly divided among public, private domestic, and foreign banks (Argentina), and foreign bank dominated (Mexico). The article traces these alternative outcomes to the power of prereform private financial groups, the virulence of “twin crises” in the transition from fixed to floating exchange rates, and the (contingent) role played by government ideology.
Fil: Etchemendy, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Departamento de Ciencia Política y Estudios Internacionales; Argentina
Fil: Puente. Ignacio. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados Unidos
Materia
Political Economy
Latin America
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76296

id CONICETDig_5ba5c536d7265170a2f84e76d98ac345
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76296
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and MexicoEtchemendy, SebastianPuente. IgnacioPolitical EconomyLatin Americahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In the early 1980s Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico had commercial banking sectors that were dominated by local banks. The largest countries in Latin America were subjected to common international economic pressures during both the neoliberal 1980s and 1990s – including the expansion of capital markets in the periphery and integration into the regional trade agreements NAFTA and Mercosur – and the post1998 financial turmoil. By 2015, however, the three countries had consolidated alternative commercial banking systems: domestic private group dominated (Brazil), mixed (i.e., ownership more evenly divided among public, private domestic, and foreign banks (Argentina), and foreign bank dominated (Mexico). The article traces these alternative outcomes to the power of prereform private financial groups, the virulence of “twin crises” in the transition from fixed to floating exchange rates, and the (contingent) role played by government ideology.Fil: Etchemendy, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Departamento de Ciencia Política y Estudios Internacionales; ArgentinaFil: Puente. Ignacio. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados UnidosGerman Institute of Global and Area Studies/Leibniz2017-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/76296Etchemendy, Sebastian; Puente. Ignacio; Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico; German Institute of Global and Area Studies/Leibniz; Journal of Politics in Latin America; 9; 1; 6-2017; 3-311868-4890CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jpla/article/view/1034info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T12:02:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76296instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 12:02:14.532CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
title Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
spellingShingle Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
Etchemendy, Sebastian
Political Economy
Latin America
title_short Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
title_full Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
title_fullStr Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
title_full_unstemmed Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
title_sort Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Etchemendy, Sebastian
Puente. Ignacio
author Etchemendy, Sebastian
author_facet Etchemendy, Sebastian
Puente. Ignacio
author_role author
author2 Puente. Ignacio
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Political Economy
Latin America
topic Political Economy
Latin America
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In the early 1980s Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico had commercial banking sectors that were dominated by local banks. The largest countries in Latin America were subjected to common international economic pressures during both the neoliberal 1980s and 1990s – including the expansion of capital markets in the periphery and integration into the regional trade agreements NAFTA and Mercosur – and the post1998 financial turmoil. By 2015, however, the three countries had consolidated alternative commercial banking systems: domestic private group dominated (Brazil), mixed (i.e., ownership more evenly divided among public, private domestic, and foreign banks (Argentina), and foreign bank dominated (Mexico). The article traces these alternative outcomes to the power of prereform private financial groups, the virulence of “twin crises” in the transition from fixed to floating exchange rates, and the (contingent) role played by government ideology.
Fil: Etchemendy, Sebastian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Departamento de Ciencia Política y Estudios Internacionales; Argentina
Fil: Puente. Ignacio. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Estados Unidos
description In the early 1980s Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico had commercial banking sectors that were dominated by local banks. The largest countries in Latin America were subjected to common international economic pressures during both the neoliberal 1980s and 1990s – including the expansion of capital markets in the periphery and integration into the regional trade agreements NAFTA and Mercosur – and the post1998 financial turmoil. By 2015, however, the three countries had consolidated alternative commercial banking systems: domestic private group dominated (Brazil), mixed (i.e., ownership more evenly divided among public, private domestic, and foreign banks (Argentina), and foreign bank dominated (Mexico). The article traces these alternative outcomes to the power of prereform private financial groups, the virulence of “twin crises” in the transition from fixed to floating exchange rates, and the (contingent) role played by government ideology.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/76296
Etchemendy, Sebastian; Puente. Ignacio; Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico; German Institute of Global and Area Studies/Leibniz; Journal of Politics in Latin America; 9; 1; 6-2017; 3-31
1868-4890
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/76296
identifier_str_mv Etchemendy, Sebastian; Puente. Ignacio; Power and Crisis: Explaining Varieties of Banking Systems in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico; German Institute of Global and Area Studies/Leibniz; Journal of Politics in Latin America; 9; 1; 6-2017; 3-31
1868-4890
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jpla/article/view/1034
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv German Institute of Global and Area Studies/Leibniz
publisher.none.fl_str_mv German Institute of Global and Area Studies/Leibniz
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782357705588736
score 12.982451