Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment

Autores
Gros, Alexis Emanuel
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In the present paper, I intend to systematically revisit Thomas Luckmann’s account of the relation between phenomenology and sociology and to assess its strengths and weaknesses in terms of constructive criticism. In order to achieve this aim, I will proceed in three steps. First (1), I will reconstruct the Luckmannian approach by means of an exhaustive analysis of his programmatic texts. Second (2), I will identify its strengths and merits. And finally (3), I will discuss its shortcomings and try to correct them in two ways, namely, by bringing Luckmann into a dialogue with other sociological-theoretical and phenomenological accounts, and by counteracting some of his problematic claims with alternative insights contained in his own work.
Fil: Gros, Alexis Emanuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universitat Jena; Alemania. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
PHENOMENOLOGICAL SOCIOLOGY
PHENOMENOLOGY
PROTO-SOCIOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY
THOMAS LUCKMANN
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165562
Acceder
id CONICETDig_581e10b0c4ed66481aa3ab09c86aaab9
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165562
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical AssessmentGros, Alexis EmanuelPHENOMENOLOGICAL SOCIOLOGYPHENOMENOLOGYPROTO-SOCIOLOGYSOCIOLOGYTHOMAS LUCKMANNhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5In the present paper, I intend to systematically revisit Thomas Luckmann’s account of the relation between phenomenology and sociology and to assess its strengths and weaknesses in terms of constructive criticism. In order to achieve this aim, I will proceed in three steps. First (1), I will reconstruct the Luckmannian approach by means of an exhaustive analysis of his programmatic texts. Second (2), I will identify its strengths and merits. And finally (3), I will discuss its shortcomings and try to correct them in two ways, namely, by bringing Luckmann into a dialogue with other sociological-theoretical and phenomenological accounts, and by counteracting some of his problematic claims with alternative insights contained in his own work.Fil: Gros, Alexis Emanuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universitat Jena; Alemania. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaSpringer Nature2021-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/165562Gros, Alexis Emanuel; Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment; Springer Nature; Human Studies; 44; 2; 6-2021; 201-2310163-85481572-851XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10746-021-09577-4info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-021-09577-4info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:18:34Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165562instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:18:34.802CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
title Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
spellingShingle Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
Gros, Alexis Emanuel
PHENOMENOLOGICAL SOCIOLOGY
PHENOMENOLOGY
PROTO-SOCIOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY
THOMAS LUCKMANN
title_short Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
title_full Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
title_fullStr Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
title_sort Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gros, Alexis Emanuel
author Gros, Alexis Emanuel
author_facet Gros, Alexis Emanuel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PHENOMENOLOGICAL SOCIOLOGY
PHENOMENOLOGY
PROTO-SOCIOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY
THOMAS LUCKMANN
topic PHENOMENOLOGICAL SOCIOLOGY
PHENOMENOLOGY
PROTO-SOCIOLOGY
SOCIOLOGY
THOMAS LUCKMANN
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In the present paper, I intend to systematically revisit Thomas Luckmann’s account of the relation between phenomenology and sociology and to assess its strengths and weaknesses in terms of constructive criticism. In order to achieve this aim, I will proceed in three steps. First (1), I will reconstruct the Luckmannian approach by means of an exhaustive analysis of his programmatic texts. Second (2), I will identify its strengths and merits. And finally (3), I will discuss its shortcomings and try to correct them in two ways, namely, by bringing Luckmann into a dialogue with other sociological-theoretical and phenomenological accounts, and by counteracting some of his problematic claims with alternative insights contained in his own work.
Fil: Gros, Alexis Emanuel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universitat Jena; Alemania. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description In the present paper, I intend to systematically revisit Thomas Luckmann’s account of the relation between phenomenology and sociology and to assess its strengths and weaknesses in terms of constructive criticism. In order to achieve this aim, I will proceed in three steps. First (1), I will reconstruct the Luckmannian approach by means of an exhaustive analysis of his programmatic texts. Second (2), I will identify its strengths and merits. And finally (3), I will discuss its shortcomings and try to correct them in two ways, namely, by bringing Luckmann into a dialogue with other sociological-theoretical and phenomenological accounts, and by counteracting some of his problematic claims with alternative insights contained in his own work.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/165562
Gros, Alexis Emanuel; Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment; Springer Nature; Human Studies; 44; 2; 6-2021; 201-231
0163-8548
1572-851X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/165562
identifier_str_mv Gros, Alexis Emanuel; Thomas Luckmann on the Relation Between Phenomenology and Sociology: A Constructive Critical Assessment; Springer Nature; Human Studies; 44; 2; 6-2021; 201-231
0163-8548
1572-851X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s10746-021-09577-4
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-021-09577-4
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842981016086511616
score 12.993085

Publicaciones similares