How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?

Autores
Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.
Año de publicación
2008
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species.
Fil: Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. State University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marquet, Pablo A.. Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad, Santiago; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. National Center For Ecological Analysis And Synthesis; Estados Unidos
Materia
CHILE
CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY
GAP ANALYSIS
PRIORITY SITES
RESERVE NETWORK
VERTEBRATES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92822

id CONICETDig_57692e7460557781ab4c1d671ac3bf29
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92822
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?Tognelli, Marcelo FabioDe Arellano, Pablo I. RamirezMarquet, Pablo A.CHILECONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHYGAP ANALYSISPRIORITY SITESRESERVE NETWORKVERTEBRATEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species.Fil: Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. State University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Marquet, Pablo A.. Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad, Santiago; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. National Center For Ecological Analysis And Synthesis; Estados UnidosWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2008-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/92822Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.; How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 14; 1; 1-2008; 148-1581366-9516CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-12-23T13:39:20Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92822instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-12-23 13:39:20.943CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
title How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
spellingShingle How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio
CHILE
CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY
GAP ANALYSIS
PRIORITY SITES
RESERVE NETWORK
VERTEBRATES
title_short How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
title_full How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
title_fullStr How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
title_full_unstemmed How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
title_sort How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio
De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez
Marquet, Pablo A.
author Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio
author_facet Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio
De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez
Marquet, Pablo A.
author_role author
author2 De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez
Marquet, Pablo A.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CHILE
CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY
GAP ANALYSIS
PRIORITY SITES
RESERVE NETWORK
VERTEBRATES
topic CHILE
CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY
GAP ANALYSIS
PRIORITY SITES
RESERVE NETWORK
VERTEBRATES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species.
Fil: Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. State University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marquet, Pablo A.. Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad, Santiago; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. National Center For Ecological Analysis And Synthesis; Estados Unidos
description Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92822
Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.; How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 14; 1; 1-2008; 148-158
1366-9516
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92822
identifier_str_mv Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.; How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 14; 1; 1-2008; 148-158
1366-9516
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.x
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.x
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1852335293013688320
score 12.952241