How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?
- Autores
- Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.
- Año de publicación
- 2008
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species.
Fil: Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile
Fil: De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. State University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marquet, Pablo A.. Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad, Santiago; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. National Center For Ecological Analysis And Synthesis; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
CHILE
CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY
GAP ANALYSIS
PRIORITY SITES
RESERVE NETWORK
VERTEBRATES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92822
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_57692e7460557781ab4c1d671ac3bf29 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92822 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?Tognelli, Marcelo FabioDe Arellano, Pablo I. RamirezMarquet, Pablo A.CHILECONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHYGAP ANALYSISPRIORITY SITESRESERVE NETWORKVERTEBRATEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species.Fil: Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; ChileFil: De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. State University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Marquet, Pablo A.. Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad, Santiago; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. National Center For Ecological Analysis And Synthesis; Estados UnidosWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2008-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/92822Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.; How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 14; 1; 1-2008; 148-1581366-9516CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-12-23T13:39:20Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/92822instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-12-23 13:39:20.943CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? |
| title |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? |
| spellingShingle |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio CHILE CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY GAP ANALYSIS PRIORITY SITES RESERVE NETWORK VERTEBRATES |
| title_short |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? |
| title_full |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? |
| title_fullStr |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? |
| title_sort |
How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile? |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez Marquet, Pablo A. |
| author |
Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio |
| author_facet |
Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez Marquet, Pablo A. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez Marquet, Pablo A. |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CHILE CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY GAP ANALYSIS PRIORITY SITES RESERVE NETWORK VERTEBRATES |
| topic |
CHILE CONSERVATION BIOGEOGRAPHY GAP ANALYSIS PRIORITY SITES RESERVE NETWORK VERTEBRATES |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species. Fil: Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile Fil: De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. State University of New York; Estados Unidos Fil: Marquet, Pablo A.. Instituto de Ecologia y Biodiversidad, Santiago; Chile. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile; Chile. National Center For Ecological Analysis And Synthesis; Estados Unidos |
| description |
Increasingly, biogeographical knowledge and analysis are playing a fundamental role in assessing the representativeness of biodiversity in protected areas, and in identifying critical areas for conservation. With almost 20% of the country assigned to protected areas, Chile is well above the conservation target (i.e. 10-12%) proposed by many international conservation organizations. Moreover, the Chilean government has recently proposed new conservation priority sites to improve the current protected area network. Here, we used all 653 terrestrial vertebrate species present in continental Chile to assess the performance of the existing and proposed reserve networks. Using geographical information systems, we overlaid maps of species distribution, current protected areas, and proposed conservation priority sites to assess how well each species is represented within these networks. Additionally, we performed a systematic reserve selection procedure to identify alternative conservation areas for expanding the current reserve system. Our results show that over 13% of the species are not covered by any existing protected area, and that 73% of Chilean vertebrate species can be considered partial gaps, with only a small fraction of their geographical ranges currently under protection. The coverage is also deficient for endemic (species confined to Chile) and threatened species. While the proposed priority sites do increase coverage, we found that there are still several gaps and these are not the most efficient choices. Both the gap analysis and the reserve selection analysis identified important areas to be added to the existing reserve system, mostly in northern and central Chile. This study underscores the need for a systematic conservation planning approach to redefine the conservation priority sites in order to maximize the representation of species, particularly endemic and threatened species. |
| publishDate |
2008 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92822 Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.; How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 14; 1; 1-2008; 148-158 1366-9516 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/92822 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Tognelli, Marcelo Fabio; De Arellano, Pablo I. Ramirez; Marquet, Pablo A.; How well do the existing and proposed reserve networks represent vertebrate species in Chile?; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Diversity and Distributions; 14; 1; 1-2008; 148-158 1366-9516 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.x info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00437.x |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1852335293013688320 |
| score |
12.952241 |