Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
- Autores
- Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; Klatt, Björn K.; Olsson, Ola; Olsson, Pål Axel; Persson, Anna S.; Prentice, Honor C.; Rundlöf, Maj; Smith, Henrik G.
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?multiple-scale land sparing,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?multiple-scale land sparing,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.
Fil: Ekroos, Johan. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Ödman, Anja M.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Birkhofer, Klaus. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Herbertsson, Lina. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Klatt, Björn K.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Olsson, Ola. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Olsson, Pål Axel. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Persson, Anna S.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Prentice, Honor C.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Rundlöf, Maj. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Smith, Henrik G.. Lund University; Suecia - Materia
-
CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING
METAPOPULATION
PROTECTED AREA
HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK
LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION
LANDSCAPE MOSAIC - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60077
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_527a2051a2adc61ceba9733357699115 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60077 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial ScalesEkroos, JohanÖdman, Anja M.Andersson, Karl Georg SixtenBirkhofer, KlausHerbertsson, LinaKlatt, Björn K.Olsson, OlaOlsson, Pål AxelPersson, Anna S.Prentice, Honor C.Rundlöf, MajSmith, Henrik G.CENTRAL PLACE FORAGINGMETAPOPULATIONPROTECTED AREAHABITAT-PATCH NETWORKLANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATIONLANDSCAPE MOSAIChttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.Fil: Ekroos, Johan. Lund University; SueciaFil: Ödman, Anja M.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Lund University; SueciaFil: Birkhofer, Klaus. Lund University; SueciaFil: Herbertsson, Lina. Lund University; SueciaFil: Klatt, Björn K.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Olsson, Ola. Lund University; SueciaFil: Olsson, Pål Axel. Lund University; SueciaFil: Persson, Anna S.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Prentice, Honor C.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Rundlöf, Maj. Lund University; SueciaFil: Smith, Henrik G.. Lund University; SueciaFrontiers Media2016-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/60077Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; et al.; Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 3; 145; 1-2016; 1-112296-701XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:11:01Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60077instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:11:02.152CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales |
title |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales |
spellingShingle |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales Ekroos, Johan CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING METAPOPULATION PROTECTED AREA HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION LANDSCAPE MOSAIC |
title_short |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales |
title_full |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales |
title_fullStr |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales |
title_sort |
Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ekroos, Johan Ödman, Anja M. Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten Birkhofer, Klaus Herbertsson, Lina Klatt, Björn K. Olsson, Ola Olsson, Pål Axel Persson, Anna S. Prentice, Honor C. Rundlöf, Maj Smith, Henrik G. |
author |
Ekroos, Johan |
author_facet |
Ekroos, Johan Ödman, Anja M. Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten Birkhofer, Klaus Herbertsson, Lina Klatt, Björn K. Olsson, Ola Olsson, Pål Axel Persson, Anna S. Prentice, Honor C. Rundlöf, Maj Smith, Henrik G. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ödman, Anja M. Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten Birkhofer, Klaus Herbertsson, Lina Klatt, Björn K. Olsson, Ola Olsson, Pål Axel Persson, Anna S. Prentice, Honor C. Rundlöf, Maj Smith, Henrik G. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING METAPOPULATION PROTECTED AREA HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION LANDSCAPE MOSAIC |
topic |
CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING METAPOPULATION PROTECTED AREA HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION LANDSCAPE MOSAIC |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality. Fil: Ekroos, Johan. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Ödman, Anja M.. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Birkhofer, Klaus. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Herbertsson, Lina. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Klatt, Björn K.. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Olsson, Ola. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Olsson, Pål Axel. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Persson, Anna S.. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Prentice, Honor C.. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Rundlöf, Maj. Lund University; Suecia Fil: Smith, Henrik G.. Lund University; Suecia |
description |
A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/60077 Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; et al.; Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 3; 145; 1-2016; 1-11 2296-701X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/60077 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; et al.; Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 3; 145; 1-2016; 1-11 2296-701X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145/full |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614005132361728 |
score |
13.070432 |