Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales

Autores
Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; Klatt, Björn K.; Olsson, Ola; Olsson, Pål Axel; Persson, Anna S.; Prentice, Honor C.; Rundlöf, Maj; Smith, Henrik G.
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?multiple-scale land sparing,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?multiple-scale land sparing,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.
Fil: Ekroos, Johan. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Ödman, Anja M.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Birkhofer, Klaus. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Herbertsson, Lina. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Klatt, Björn K.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Olsson, Ola. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Olsson, Pål Axel. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Persson, Anna S.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Prentice, Honor C.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Rundlöf, Maj. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Smith, Henrik G.. Lund University; Suecia
Materia
CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING
METAPOPULATION
PROTECTED AREA
HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK
LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION
LANDSCAPE MOSAIC
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60077

id CONICETDig_527a2051a2adc61ceba9733357699115
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60077
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial ScalesEkroos, JohanÖdman, Anja M.Andersson, Karl Georg SixtenBirkhofer, KlausHerbertsson, LinaKlatt, Björn K.Olsson, OlaOlsson, Pål AxelPersson, Anna S.Prentice, Honor C.Rundlöf, MajSmith, Henrik G.CENTRAL PLACE FORAGINGMETAPOPULATIONPROTECTED AREAHABITAT-PATCH NETWORKLANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATIONLANDSCAPE MOSAIChttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.Fil: Ekroos, Johan. Lund University; SueciaFil: Ödman, Anja M.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Lund University; SueciaFil: Birkhofer, Klaus. Lund University; SueciaFil: Herbertsson, Lina. Lund University; SueciaFil: Klatt, Björn K.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Olsson, Ola. Lund University; SueciaFil: Olsson, Pål Axel. Lund University; SueciaFil: Persson, Anna S.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Prentice, Honor C.. Lund University; SueciaFil: Rundlöf, Maj. Lund University; SueciaFil: Smith, Henrik G.. Lund University; SueciaFrontiers Media2016-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/60077Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; et al.; Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 3; 145; 1-2016; 1-112296-701XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:11:01Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/60077instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:11:02.152CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
title Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
spellingShingle Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
Ekroos, Johan
CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING
METAPOPULATION
PROTECTED AREA
HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK
LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION
LANDSCAPE MOSAIC
title_short Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
title_full Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
title_fullStr Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
title_full_unstemmed Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
title_sort Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ekroos, Johan
Ödman, Anja M.
Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten
Birkhofer, Klaus
Herbertsson, Lina
Klatt, Björn K.
Olsson, Ola
Olsson, Pål Axel
Persson, Anna S.
Prentice, Honor C.
Rundlöf, Maj
Smith, Henrik G.
author Ekroos, Johan
author_facet Ekroos, Johan
Ödman, Anja M.
Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten
Birkhofer, Klaus
Herbertsson, Lina
Klatt, Björn K.
Olsson, Ola
Olsson, Pål Axel
Persson, Anna S.
Prentice, Honor C.
Rundlöf, Maj
Smith, Henrik G.
author_role author
author2 Ödman, Anja M.
Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten
Birkhofer, Klaus
Herbertsson, Lina
Klatt, Björn K.
Olsson, Ola
Olsson, Pål Axel
Persson, Anna S.
Prentice, Honor C.
Rundlöf, Maj
Smith, Henrik G.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING
METAPOPULATION
PROTECTED AREA
HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK
LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION
LANDSCAPE MOSAIC
topic CENTRAL PLACE FORAGING
METAPOPULATION
PROTECTED AREA
HABITAT-PATCH NETWORK
LANDSCAPE COMPLEMENTATION
LANDSCAPE MOSAIC
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.
Fil: Ekroos, Johan. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Ödman, Anja M.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Birkhofer, Klaus. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Herbertsson, Lina. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Klatt, Björn K.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Olsson, Ola. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Olsson, Pål Axel. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Persson, Anna S.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Prentice, Honor C.. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Rundlöf, Maj. Lund University; Suecia
Fil: Smith, Henrik G.. Lund University; Suecia
description A common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscA common approach to the conservation of farmland biodiversity and the promotion of multifunctional landscapes, particularly in landscapes containing only small remnants of non-crop habitats, has been to maintain landscape heterogeneity and reduce land-use intensity. In contrast, it has recently been shown that devoting specific areas of non-crop habitats to conservation, segregated from high-yielding farmland (?land sparing?), can more effectively conserve biodiversity than promoting low-yielding, less intensively managed farmland occupying larger areas (?land sharing?). In the present paper we suggest that the debate over the relative merits of land sparing or land sharing is partly blurred by the differing spatial scales at which it is suggested that land sparing should be applied. We argue that there is no single correct spatial scale for segregating biodiversity protection and commodity production in multifunctional landscapes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.apes. Instead we propose an alternative conceptual construct, which we call ?<i>multiple-scale land sparing</i>,? targeting biodiversity and ecosystem services in transformed landscapes. We discuss how multiple-scale land sparing may overcome the apparent dichotomy between land sharing and land sparing and help to find acceptable compromises that conserve biodiversity and landscape multifunctionality.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/60077
Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; et al.; Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 3; 145; 1-2016; 1-11
2296-701X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/60077
identifier_str_mv Ekroos, Johan; Ödman, Anja M.; Andersson, Karl Georg Sixten; Birkhofer, Klaus; Herbertsson, Lina; et al.; Sparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial Scales; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution; 3; 145; 1-2016; 1-11
2296-701X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2015.00145/full
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614005132361728
score 13.070432