Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner

Autores
Trenti, Edgardo Javier; Barraza, Jose Fernando; Eckstein, Miguel P.
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We used the optimal perceptual learning paradigm (Eckstein, Abbey, Pham, & Shimozaki, 2004) to investigate the dynamics of human rapid learning processes in motion discrimination tasks and compare it to an optimal Bayesian learner. This paradigm consists of blocks of few trials defined by a set of target attributes, and it has been shown its ability to detect learning effects appearing as soon as after the first trial. In the present task a sequence consisting of four patches containing random-dot patterns is presented at four separate locations equidistant from a fixation point. On each trial, the random dots in three patches moved with a mean speed and the fourth, target patch, could move either with slower or faster mean speed. Observers' task was to indicate what speed, faster or slower, was present in the display. The mean direction of the target patch was kept invariant along a block of trials. Observers learned the target relevant motion direction through indirect feedback, leading to an improvement in speed identification performance ranging from 15% to 30% which is greater than previously studied contrast defined targets and faces. However, comparison to an ideal learner revealed incomplete or partial learning for the motion task which was lower than previously measured for contrast defined targets and faces. A sub-optimal model that included inefficiencies in the updating of motion direction weights due to memory effects could account for the human learning. Finally, the similarity of the rapid learning effect observed here for motion perception with that found for contrast defined targets for localization and identification tasks could be suggesting a general strategy for learning in the human visual system and some common limitations such as memory.
Fil: Trenti, Edgardo Javier. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina
Fil: Barraza, Jose Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Investigación en Luz, Ambiente y Visión. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Instituto de Investigación en Luz, Ambiente y Visión; Argentina
Fil: Eckstein, Miguel P.. University of California; Estados Unidos
Materia
LEARNING EFFICIENCY
LEARNING MOTION
OPTIMAL BAYESIAN LEARNER
PERCEPTUAL LEARNING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/97098

id CONICETDig_50cec73ebc7e98a7359573a6b7a098c1
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/97098
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learnerTrenti, Edgardo JavierBarraza, Jose FernandoEckstein, Miguel P.LEARNING EFFICIENCYLEARNING MOTIONOPTIMAL BAYESIAN LEARNERPERCEPTUAL LEARNINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2We used the optimal perceptual learning paradigm (Eckstein, Abbey, Pham, & Shimozaki, 2004) to investigate the dynamics of human rapid learning processes in motion discrimination tasks and compare it to an optimal Bayesian learner. This paradigm consists of blocks of few trials defined by a set of target attributes, and it has been shown its ability to detect learning effects appearing as soon as after the first trial. In the present task a sequence consisting of four patches containing random-dot patterns is presented at four separate locations equidistant from a fixation point. On each trial, the random dots in three patches moved with a mean speed and the fourth, target patch, could move either with slower or faster mean speed. Observers' task was to indicate what speed, faster or slower, was present in the display. The mean direction of the target patch was kept invariant along a block of trials. Observers learned the target relevant motion direction through indirect feedback, leading to an improvement in speed identification performance ranging from 15% to 30% which is greater than previously studied contrast defined targets and faces. However, comparison to an ideal learner revealed incomplete or partial learning for the motion task which was lower than previously measured for contrast defined targets and faces. A sub-optimal model that included inefficiencies in the updating of motion direction weights due to memory effects could account for the human learning. Finally, the similarity of the rapid learning effect observed here for motion perception with that found for contrast defined targets for localization and identification tasks could be suggesting a general strategy for learning in the human visual system and some common limitations such as memory.Fil: Trenti, Edgardo Javier. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; ArgentinaFil: Barraza, Jose Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Investigación en Luz, Ambiente y Visión. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Instituto de Investigación en Luz, Ambiente y Visión; ArgentinaFil: Eckstein, Miguel P.. University of California; Estados UnidosPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd2010-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/97098Trenti, Edgardo Javier; Barraza, Jose Fernando; Eckstein, Miguel P.; Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Vision Research; 50; 4; 2-2010; 460-4720042-6989CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698909004982info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-05T09:42:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/97098instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-05 09:42:28.998CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
title Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
spellingShingle Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
Trenti, Edgardo Javier
LEARNING EFFICIENCY
LEARNING MOTION
OPTIMAL BAYESIAN LEARNER
PERCEPTUAL LEARNING
title_short Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
title_full Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
title_fullStr Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
title_full_unstemmed Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
title_sort Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Trenti, Edgardo Javier
Barraza, Jose Fernando
Eckstein, Miguel P.
author Trenti, Edgardo Javier
author_facet Trenti, Edgardo Javier
Barraza, Jose Fernando
Eckstein, Miguel P.
author_role author
author2 Barraza, Jose Fernando
Eckstein, Miguel P.
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv LEARNING EFFICIENCY
LEARNING MOTION
OPTIMAL BAYESIAN LEARNER
PERCEPTUAL LEARNING
topic LEARNING EFFICIENCY
LEARNING MOTION
OPTIMAL BAYESIAN LEARNER
PERCEPTUAL LEARNING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We used the optimal perceptual learning paradigm (Eckstein, Abbey, Pham, & Shimozaki, 2004) to investigate the dynamics of human rapid learning processes in motion discrimination tasks and compare it to an optimal Bayesian learner. This paradigm consists of blocks of few trials defined by a set of target attributes, and it has been shown its ability to detect learning effects appearing as soon as after the first trial. In the present task a sequence consisting of four patches containing random-dot patterns is presented at four separate locations equidistant from a fixation point. On each trial, the random dots in three patches moved with a mean speed and the fourth, target patch, could move either with slower or faster mean speed. Observers' task was to indicate what speed, faster or slower, was present in the display. The mean direction of the target patch was kept invariant along a block of trials. Observers learned the target relevant motion direction through indirect feedback, leading to an improvement in speed identification performance ranging from 15% to 30% which is greater than previously studied contrast defined targets and faces. However, comparison to an ideal learner revealed incomplete or partial learning for the motion task which was lower than previously measured for contrast defined targets and faces. A sub-optimal model that included inefficiencies in the updating of motion direction weights due to memory effects could account for the human learning. Finally, the similarity of the rapid learning effect observed here for motion perception with that found for contrast defined targets for localization and identification tasks could be suggesting a general strategy for learning in the human visual system and some common limitations such as memory.
Fil: Trenti, Edgardo Javier. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina
Fil: Barraza, Jose Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Investigación en Luz, Ambiente y Visión. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Instituto de Investigación en Luz, Ambiente y Visión; Argentina
Fil: Eckstein, Miguel P.. University of California; Estados Unidos
description We used the optimal perceptual learning paradigm (Eckstein, Abbey, Pham, & Shimozaki, 2004) to investigate the dynamics of human rapid learning processes in motion discrimination tasks and compare it to an optimal Bayesian learner. This paradigm consists of blocks of few trials defined by a set of target attributes, and it has been shown its ability to detect learning effects appearing as soon as after the first trial. In the present task a sequence consisting of four patches containing random-dot patterns is presented at four separate locations equidistant from a fixation point. On each trial, the random dots in three patches moved with a mean speed and the fourth, target patch, could move either with slower or faster mean speed. Observers' task was to indicate what speed, faster or slower, was present in the display. The mean direction of the target patch was kept invariant along a block of trials. Observers learned the target relevant motion direction through indirect feedback, leading to an improvement in speed identification performance ranging from 15% to 30% which is greater than previously studied contrast defined targets and faces. However, comparison to an ideal learner revealed incomplete or partial learning for the motion task which was lower than previously measured for contrast defined targets and faces. A sub-optimal model that included inefficiencies in the updating of motion direction weights due to memory effects could account for the human learning. Finally, the similarity of the rapid learning effect observed here for motion perception with that found for contrast defined targets for localization and identification tasks could be suggesting a general strategy for learning in the human visual system and some common limitations such as memory.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/97098
Trenti, Edgardo Javier; Barraza, Jose Fernando; Eckstein, Miguel P.; Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Vision Research; 50; 4; 2-2010; 460-472
0042-6989
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/97098
identifier_str_mv Trenti, Edgardo Javier; Barraza, Jose Fernando; Eckstein, Miguel P.; Learning motion: Human vs. optimal Bayesian learner; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; Vision Research; 50; 4; 2-2010; 460-472
0042-6989
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698909004982
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.visres.2009.10.018
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1847976997218680832
score 13.084122