Lloyd's Orthodoxy
- Autores
- Venezia, Luciano Javier
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In this paper, I will show that Lloyd’s reading of Hobbes’s account of political obedience is substantially similar to the mainstream philosophical interpretation. In particular, both include an “orthodox” interpretation of Hobbes’s political and legal philosophy. On the orthodox interpretation, the reasonableness of a choice is determined by the “weight” or “balance” of reasons. Subjects have reason to obey the law because so acting best satisfies their different desires and interests. I will argue that the practical reasoning that takes into consideration transcendent interests, and the reasoning that takes into account mundane interests, are structurally similar. The difference between them lies in the fact that transcendent interests always outweigh other first-order considerations, whilst the relative weight of mundane interests always enters into a calculation of the “balance” of reasons to be assessed each time.
Fil: Venezia, Luciano Javier. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centre d’Études Sociologiques et Politiques Raymond Aron; Francia - Materia
-
Lloyd
Law
Obedience
Authority
Reason - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/28503
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_502caed865b2e3b4c10f46aa20948d67 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/28503 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Lloyd's OrthodoxyVenezia, Luciano JavierLloydLawObedienceAuthorityReasonhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this paper, I will show that Lloyd’s reading of Hobbes’s account of political obedience is substantially similar to the mainstream philosophical interpretation. In particular, both include an “orthodox” interpretation of Hobbes’s political and legal philosophy. On the orthodox interpretation, the reasonableness of a choice is determined by the “weight” or “balance” of reasons. Subjects have reason to obey the law because so acting best satisfies their different desires and interests. I will argue that the practical reasoning that takes into consideration transcendent interests, and the reasoning that takes into account mundane interests, are structurally similar. The difference between them lies in the fact that transcendent interests always outweigh other first-order considerations, whilst the relative weight of mundane interests always enters into a calculation of the “balance” of reasons to be assessed each time.Fil: Venezia, Luciano Javier. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centre d’Études Sociologiques et Politiques Raymond Aron; FranciaBrill Academic Publishers2013-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/28503Venezia, Luciano Javier; Lloyd's Orthodoxy; Brill Academic Publishers; Hobbes Studies; 26; 2; 11-2013; 171-1840921-58911875-0257CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18750257-02602001info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18750257-02602001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:06:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/28503instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:06:50.106CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy |
title |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy |
spellingShingle |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy Venezia, Luciano Javier Lloyd Law Obedience Authority Reason |
title_short |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy |
title_full |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy |
title_fullStr |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy |
title_sort |
Lloyd's Orthodoxy |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Venezia, Luciano Javier |
author |
Venezia, Luciano Javier |
author_facet |
Venezia, Luciano Javier |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Lloyd Law Obedience Authority Reason |
topic |
Lloyd Law Obedience Authority Reason |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In this paper, I will show that Lloyd’s reading of Hobbes’s account of political obedience is substantially similar to the mainstream philosophical interpretation. In particular, both include an “orthodox” interpretation of Hobbes’s political and legal philosophy. On the orthodox interpretation, the reasonableness of a choice is determined by the “weight” or “balance” of reasons. Subjects have reason to obey the law because so acting best satisfies their different desires and interests. I will argue that the practical reasoning that takes into consideration transcendent interests, and the reasoning that takes into account mundane interests, are structurally similar. The difference between them lies in the fact that transcendent interests always outweigh other first-order considerations, whilst the relative weight of mundane interests always enters into a calculation of the “balance” of reasons to be assessed each time. Fil: Venezia, Luciano Javier. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Centre d’Études Sociologiques et Politiques Raymond Aron; Francia |
description |
In this paper, I will show that Lloyd’s reading of Hobbes’s account of political obedience is substantially similar to the mainstream philosophical interpretation. In particular, both include an “orthodox” interpretation of Hobbes’s political and legal philosophy. On the orthodox interpretation, the reasonableness of a choice is determined by the “weight” or “balance” of reasons. Subjects have reason to obey the law because so acting best satisfies their different desires and interests. I will argue that the practical reasoning that takes into consideration transcendent interests, and the reasoning that takes into account mundane interests, are structurally similar. The difference between them lies in the fact that transcendent interests always outweigh other first-order considerations, whilst the relative weight of mundane interests always enters into a calculation of the “balance” of reasons to be assessed each time. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/28503 Venezia, Luciano Javier; Lloyd's Orthodoxy; Brill Academic Publishers; Hobbes Studies; 26; 2; 11-2013; 171-184 0921-5891 1875-0257 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/28503 |
identifier_str_mv |
Venezia, Luciano Javier; Lloyd's Orthodoxy; Brill Academic Publishers; Hobbes Studies; 26; 2; 11-2013; 171-184 0921-5891 1875-0257 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18750257-02602001 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1163/18750257-02602001 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/msword application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brill Academic Publishers |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brill Academic Publishers |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269976406261760 |
score |
13.13397 |