Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel

Autores
Sneegas, Gretchen; Seghezzo, Lucas; Brannstrom, Christian; Jepson, Wendy; Eckstein, Gabriel
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Israel has set ambitious goals in terms of the widespread adoption of desalination and water recycling technologies. Policymakers in Israel consider these technologies as the key to improve urban water security but knowledge of stakeholder views on this policy approach is not well established. We deployed the Q-methodology, a qualitative-quantitative approach, to empirically determine social perspectives on desalination and water recycling across a wide range of stakeholders in the Israeli water sector. We identified the following four distinctive social perspectives: (1) desalination should be the option of last resort; (2) desalination is moving us to an infinite resource; (3) equating savings to resources is a dangerous illusion; and (4) desalination is (risky) electric water. A common characteristic of these perspectives is the belief that desalination is necessary for a water-secure country, but desalination should not be the only source of drinking water in Israel. Our findings indicate that Israeli stakeholders show complex and contingent understandings of the pros and cons of desalination and water recycling and the risks involved in too much reliance on a limited number of water sources. We discuss the potential implications of our findings for water management and security in Israel and other places with water scarcity concerns.
Fil: Sneegas, Gretchen. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Seghezzo, Lucas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía no Convencional. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía no Convencional; Argentina
Fil: Brannstrom, Christian. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jepson, Wendy. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Eckstein, Gabriel. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Materia
DESALINATION
ISRAEL
Q-METHODOLOGY
SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES
WATER POLICY
WATER RECYCLING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203558

id CONICETDig_4d36b5da1d13f7621a1cd581d5e75b72
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203558
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in IsraelSneegas, GretchenSeghezzo, LucasBrannstrom, ChristianJepson, WendyEckstein, GabrielDESALINATIONISRAELQ-METHODOLOGYSOCIAL PERSPECTIVESWATER POLICYWATER RECYCLINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Israel has set ambitious goals in terms of the widespread adoption of desalination and water recycling technologies. Policymakers in Israel consider these technologies as the key to improve urban water security but knowledge of stakeholder views on this policy approach is not well established. We deployed the Q-methodology, a qualitative-quantitative approach, to empirically determine social perspectives on desalination and water recycling across a wide range of stakeholders in the Israeli water sector. We identified the following four distinctive social perspectives: (1) desalination should be the option of last resort; (2) desalination is moving us to an infinite resource; (3) equating savings to resources is a dangerous illusion; and (4) desalination is (risky) electric water. A common characteristic of these perspectives is the belief that desalination is necessary for a water-secure country, but desalination should not be the only source of drinking water in Israel. Our findings indicate that Israeli stakeholders show complex and contingent understandings of the pros and cons of desalination and water recycling and the risks involved in too much reliance on a limited number of water sources. We discuss the potential implications of our findings for water management and security in Israel and other places with water scarcity concerns.Fil: Sneegas, Gretchen. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Seghezzo, Lucas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía no Convencional. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía no Convencional; ArgentinaFil: Brannstrom, Christian. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Jepson, Wendy. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Eckstein, Gabriel. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosIWA Publishing2022-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/203558Sneegas, Gretchen; Seghezzo, Lucas; Brannstrom, Christian; Jepson, Wendy; Eckstein, Gabriel; Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel; IWA Publishing; Water Policy; 24; 11; 11-2022; 1772–17951366-7017CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iwaponline.com/wp/article/doi/10.2166/wp.2022.085/91796info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2166/wp.2022.085info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-12T09:38:55Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/203558instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-12 09:38:55.797CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
title Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
spellingShingle Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
Sneegas, Gretchen
DESALINATION
ISRAEL
Q-METHODOLOGY
SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES
WATER POLICY
WATER RECYCLING
title_short Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
title_full Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
title_fullStr Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
title_full_unstemmed Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
title_sort Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sneegas, Gretchen
Seghezzo, Lucas
Brannstrom, Christian
Jepson, Wendy
Eckstein, Gabriel
author Sneegas, Gretchen
author_facet Sneegas, Gretchen
Seghezzo, Lucas
Brannstrom, Christian
Jepson, Wendy
Eckstein, Gabriel
author_role author
author2 Seghezzo, Lucas
Brannstrom, Christian
Jepson, Wendy
Eckstein, Gabriel
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DESALINATION
ISRAEL
Q-METHODOLOGY
SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES
WATER POLICY
WATER RECYCLING
topic DESALINATION
ISRAEL
Q-METHODOLOGY
SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES
WATER POLICY
WATER RECYCLING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.7
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Israel has set ambitious goals in terms of the widespread adoption of desalination and water recycling technologies. Policymakers in Israel consider these technologies as the key to improve urban water security but knowledge of stakeholder views on this policy approach is not well established. We deployed the Q-methodology, a qualitative-quantitative approach, to empirically determine social perspectives on desalination and water recycling across a wide range of stakeholders in the Israeli water sector. We identified the following four distinctive social perspectives: (1) desalination should be the option of last resort; (2) desalination is moving us to an infinite resource; (3) equating savings to resources is a dangerous illusion; and (4) desalination is (risky) electric water. A common characteristic of these perspectives is the belief that desalination is necessary for a water-secure country, but desalination should not be the only source of drinking water in Israel. Our findings indicate that Israeli stakeholders show complex and contingent understandings of the pros and cons of desalination and water recycling and the risks involved in too much reliance on a limited number of water sources. We discuss the potential implications of our findings for water management and security in Israel and other places with water scarcity concerns.
Fil: Sneegas, Gretchen. University of Washington; Estados Unidos
Fil: Seghezzo, Lucas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta. Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía no Convencional. Universidad Nacional de Salta. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Física. Instituto de Investigaciones en Energía no Convencional; Argentina
Fil: Brannstrom, Christian. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jepson, Wendy. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Eckstein, Gabriel. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
description Israel has set ambitious goals in terms of the widespread adoption of desalination and water recycling technologies. Policymakers in Israel consider these technologies as the key to improve urban water security but knowledge of stakeholder views on this policy approach is not well established. We deployed the Q-methodology, a qualitative-quantitative approach, to empirically determine social perspectives on desalination and water recycling across a wide range of stakeholders in the Israeli water sector. We identified the following four distinctive social perspectives: (1) desalination should be the option of last resort; (2) desalination is moving us to an infinite resource; (3) equating savings to resources is a dangerous illusion; and (4) desalination is (risky) electric water. A common characteristic of these perspectives is the belief that desalination is necessary for a water-secure country, but desalination should not be the only source of drinking water in Israel. Our findings indicate that Israeli stakeholders show complex and contingent understandings of the pros and cons of desalination and water recycling and the risks involved in too much reliance on a limited number of water sources. We discuss the potential implications of our findings for water management and security in Israel and other places with water scarcity concerns.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203558
Sneegas, Gretchen; Seghezzo, Lucas; Brannstrom, Christian; Jepson, Wendy; Eckstein, Gabriel; Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel; IWA Publishing; Water Policy; 24; 11; 11-2022; 1772–1795
1366-7017
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/203558
identifier_str_mv Sneegas, Gretchen; Seghezzo, Lucas; Brannstrom, Christian; Jepson, Wendy; Eckstein, Gabriel; Do not put all your eggs in one basket: social perspectives on desalination and water recycling in Israel; IWA Publishing; Water Policy; 24; 11; 11-2022; 1772–1795
1366-7017
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iwaponline.com/wp/article/doi/10.2166/wp.2022.085/91796
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2166/wp.2022.085
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IWA Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IWA Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1848597409452523520
score 13.24909