A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue

Autores
Ballari, Sebastián A.; Roulier, Catherine Solange; Nielsen, Erik; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Anderson, Christopher Brian
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
To determine global trends in ecological restoration (ER) research, we conducted a geographically-explicit English-language literature review. We assessed a representative sample (n=603) of publications that use the ER concept (n=8,678). Only 19.2% (n=118) were explicit ER studies, and these were evaluated to determine geographic location, research framework, ER paradigm, journal disciplinary orientation, article type, disturbance factor studied, and ER-response measurements. The Global North produced 2x more studies than the South, and ecological research frameworks predominated overall. However, significantly more Southern studies operated under a postmodern paradigm (i.e., addressing ecosystem processes, functions and health) than in the North, where more studies sought to reconstitute pre-disturbance biotic assemblages (i.e., classical paradigm). Both regions published mostly in natural science journals, but significantly more in the North; in the South, there were significantly more publications in engineering journals. An incipient socio-ecological research framework was detected in the North (23.1%) and South (32.5%), but social science studies were only found in the North (11.5%). Plus, the North had significantly more conceptual publications. Opportunities exist in both regions to enhance a holistic ER perspective. Southern scientists and practitioners could pay attention to context-specific concepts and approaches. Understanding global and regional ER research trends can contribute to improving theoretical, practical and ethical outcomes.
Fil: Ballari, Sebastián A.. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. Administración de Parques Nacionales. Parque Nacional "Nahuel Huapi". Departamento Conservación y Educación Ambiental; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Roulier, Catherine Solange. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego. Instituto de Cultura, Sociedad y Estado; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Nielsen, Erik. Northern Arizona University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pizarro, J. Cristobal. Universidad de Concepción; Chile. Centro para el Impacto Socioeconómico de las Políticas Ambientales; Chile
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Materia
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
REMEDIATION
RESTORATION ECOLOGY
SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/126673
Acceder
id CONICETDig_44e457aabc9c2f0c66181dfbbe7878dd
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/126673
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge DialogueBallari, Sebastián A.Roulier, Catherine SolangeNielsen, ErikPizarro, J. CristobalAnderson, Christopher BrianECOLOGICAL RESTORATIONECOSYSTEM SERVICESENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATIONREMEDIATIONRESTORATION ECOLOGYSOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1To determine global trends in ecological restoration (ER) research, we conducted a geographically-explicit English-language literature review. We assessed a representative sample (n=603) of publications that use the ER concept (n=8,678). Only 19.2% (n=118) were explicit ER studies, and these were evaluated to determine geographic location, research framework, ER paradigm, journal disciplinary orientation, article type, disturbance factor studied, and ER-response measurements. The Global North produced 2x more studies than the South, and ecological research frameworks predominated overall. However, significantly more Southern studies operated under a postmodern paradigm (i.e., addressing ecosystem processes, functions and health) than in the North, where more studies sought to reconstitute pre-disturbance biotic assemblages (i.e., classical paradigm). Both regions published mostly in natural science journals, but significantly more in the North; in the South, there were significantly more publications in engineering journals. An incipient socio-ecological research framework was detected in the North (23.1%) and South (32.5%), but social science studies were only found in the North (11.5%). Plus, the North had significantly more conceptual publications. Opportunities exist in both regions to enhance a holistic ER perspective. Southern scientists and practitioners could pay attention to context-specific concepts and approaches. Understanding global and regional ER research trends can contribute to improving theoretical, practical and ethical outcomes.Fil: Ballari, Sebastián A.. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. Administración de Parques Nacionales. Parque Nacional "Nahuel Huapi". Departamento Conservación y Educación Ambiental; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaFil: Roulier, Catherine Solange. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego. Instituto de Cultura, Sociedad y Estado; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaFil: Nielsen, Erik. Northern Arizona University; Estados UnidosFil: Pizarro, J. Cristobal. Universidad de Concepción; Chile. Centro para el Impacto Socioeconómico de las Políticas Ambientales; ChileFil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; ArgentinaWolters Kluwer Medknow2020-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/126673Ballari, Sebastián A.; Roulier, Catherine Solange; Nielsen, Erik; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Anderson, Christopher Brian; A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue; Wolters Kluwer Medknow; Conservation and Society; 18; 3; 3-2020; 298-3100972-49230975-3133CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.conservationandsociety.orginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4103/cs.cs_19_91info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:40:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/126673instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:40:10.078CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
title A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
spellingShingle A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
Ballari, Sebastián A.
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
REMEDIATION
RESTORATION ECOLOGY
SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
title_short A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
title_full A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
title_fullStr A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
title_sort A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ballari, Sebastián A.
Roulier, Catherine Solange
Nielsen, Erik
Pizarro, J. Cristobal
Anderson, Christopher Brian
author Ballari, Sebastián A.
author_facet Ballari, Sebastián A.
Roulier, Catherine Solange
Nielsen, Erik
Pizarro, J. Cristobal
Anderson, Christopher Brian
author_role author
author2 Roulier, Catherine Solange
Nielsen, Erik
Pizarro, J. Cristobal
Anderson, Christopher Brian
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
REMEDIATION
RESTORATION ECOLOGY
SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
topic ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION
REMEDIATION
RESTORATION ECOLOGY
SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv To determine global trends in ecological restoration (ER) research, we conducted a geographically-explicit English-language literature review. We assessed a representative sample (n=603) of publications that use the ER concept (n=8,678). Only 19.2% (n=118) were explicit ER studies, and these were evaluated to determine geographic location, research framework, ER paradigm, journal disciplinary orientation, article type, disturbance factor studied, and ER-response measurements. The Global North produced 2x more studies than the South, and ecological research frameworks predominated overall. However, significantly more Southern studies operated under a postmodern paradigm (i.e., addressing ecosystem processes, functions and health) than in the North, where more studies sought to reconstitute pre-disturbance biotic assemblages (i.e., classical paradigm). Both regions published mostly in natural science journals, but significantly more in the North; in the South, there were significantly more publications in engineering journals. An incipient socio-ecological research framework was detected in the North (23.1%) and South (32.5%), but social science studies were only found in the North (11.5%). Plus, the North had significantly more conceptual publications. Opportunities exist in both regions to enhance a holistic ER perspective. Southern scientists and practitioners could pay attention to context-specific concepts and approaches. Understanding global and regional ER research trends can contribute to improving theoretical, practical and ethical outcomes.
Fil: Ballari, Sebastián A.. Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable. Administración de Parques Nacionales. Parque Nacional "Nahuel Huapi". Departamento Conservación y Educación Ambiental; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Roulier, Catherine Solange. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego. Instituto de Cultura, Sociedad y Estado; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
Fil: Nielsen, Erik. Northern Arizona University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pizarro, J. Cristobal. Universidad de Concepción; Chile. Centro para el Impacto Socioeconómico de las Políticas Ambientales; Chile
Fil: Anderson, Christopher Brian. Universidad Nacional de Tierra del Fuego; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas; Argentina
description To determine global trends in ecological restoration (ER) research, we conducted a geographically-explicit English-language literature review. We assessed a representative sample (n=603) of publications that use the ER concept (n=8,678). Only 19.2% (n=118) were explicit ER studies, and these were evaluated to determine geographic location, research framework, ER paradigm, journal disciplinary orientation, article type, disturbance factor studied, and ER-response measurements. The Global North produced 2x more studies than the South, and ecological research frameworks predominated overall. However, significantly more Southern studies operated under a postmodern paradigm (i.e., addressing ecosystem processes, functions and health) than in the North, where more studies sought to reconstitute pre-disturbance biotic assemblages (i.e., classical paradigm). Both regions published mostly in natural science journals, but significantly more in the North; in the South, there were significantly more publications in engineering journals. An incipient socio-ecological research framework was detected in the North (23.1%) and South (32.5%), but social science studies were only found in the North (11.5%). Plus, the North had significantly more conceptual publications. Opportunities exist in both regions to enhance a holistic ER perspective. Southern scientists and practitioners could pay attention to context-specific concepts and approaches. Understanding global and regional ER research trends can contribute to improving theoretical, practical and ethical outcomes.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/126673
Ballari, Sebastián A.; Roulier, Catherine Solange; Nielsen, Erik; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Anderson, Christopher Brian; A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue; Wolters Kluwer Medknow; Conservation and Society; 18; 3; 3-2020; 298-310
0972-4923
0975-3133
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/126673
identifier_str_mv Ballari, Sebastián A.; Roulier, Catherine Solange; Nielsen, Erik; Pizarro, J. Cristobal; Anderson, Christopher Brian; A Review of Ecological Restoration Research in the Global South and North to Promote Knowledge Dialogue; Wolters Kluwer Medknow; Conservation and Society; 18; 3; 3-2020; 298-310
0972-4923
0975-3133
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.conservationandsociety.org
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4103/cs.cs_19_91
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer Medknow
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer Medknow
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082891484758016
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares