Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs
- Autores
- Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Lux, Hanni; Ascasibar, Yago; Behroozi, Peter; Casado, Javier; Corbett Moran, Christine; Diemand, Juerg; Dolag, Klaus; Dominguez Tenreiro, Rosa; Elahi, Pascal; Falck, Bridget; Gottlober, Stefan; Han, Jiaxin; Klypin, Anatoly; Lukic, Zarija; Maciejewski, Michal; McBride, Cameron K.; Merchan, Manuel Enrique; Muldrew, Stuart I.; Neyrinck, Mark; Onions, Julian; Planelles, Susana; Potter, Doug; Quilis, Vicent; Rasera, Yann; Ricker, Paul M.; Roy, Fabrice; Ruiz, Andrés Nicolás; Sgró, Mario Agustín; Springel, Volker; Stadel, Joachim; Sutter, P. M.; Tweed, Dylan; Zemp, Marcel
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The ever increasing size and complexity of data coming from simulations of cosmic structure formation demand equally sophisticated tools for their analysis. During the past decade, the art of object finding in these simulations has hence developed into an important discipline itself. A multitude of codes based upon a huge variety of methods and techniques have been spawned yet the question remained as to whether or not they will provide the same (physical) information about the structures of interest. Here we summarize and extent previous work of the ‘halo finder comparison project’: we investigate in detail the (possible) origin of any deviations across finders. To this extent, we decipher and discuss differences in halo-finding methods, clearly separating them from the disparity in definitions of halo properties. We observe that different codes not only find different numbers of objects leading to a scatter of up to 20 per cent in the halo mass and Vmax function, but also that the particulars of those objects that are identified by all finders differ. The strength of the variation, however, depends on the property studied, e.g. the scatter in position, bulk velocity, mass and the peak value of the rotation curve is practically below a few per cent, whereas derived quantities such as spin and shape show larger deviations. Our study indicates that the prime contribution to differences in halo properties across codes stems from the distinct particle collection methods and – to a minor extent – the particular aspects of how the procedure for removing unbound particles is implemented. We close with a discussion of the relevance and implications of the scatter across different codes for other fields such as semi-analytical galaxy formation models, gravitational lensing and observables in general.
Fil: Knebe, Alexander. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España
Fil: Pearce, Frazer R.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido
Fil: Lux, Hanni. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Ascasibar, Yago. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España
Fil: Behroozi, Peter. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos
Fil: Casado, Javier. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España
Fil: Corbett Moran, Christine. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Diemand, Juerg. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Dolag, Klaus. Gobierno de la Republica Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut Fur Astrophysik; Alemania
Fil: Dominguez Tenreiro, Rosa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España
Fil: Elahi, Pascal. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory; China
Fil: Falck, Bridget. University of Portsmouth; Reino Unido
Fil: Gottlober, Stefan. Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam; Alemania
Fil: Han, Jiaxin. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory; China. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China. University Of Durham; Reino Unido
Fil: Klypin, Anatoly. New Mexico State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lukic, Zarija. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Estados Unidos. Los Alamos National High Magnetic Field Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Maciejewski, Michal. Gobierno de la Republica Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut Fur Astrophysik; Alemania
Fil: McBride, Cameron K.. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Merchan, Manuel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Muldrew, Stuart I.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido
Fil: Neyrinck, Mark. University Johns Hopkins; Estados Unidos
Fil: Onions, Julian. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido
Fil: Planelles, Susana. Università degli Studi di Trieste; Italia
Fil: Potter, Doug. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Quilis, Vicent. Universidad de Valencia; España
Fil: Rasera, Yann. Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7; Francia
Fil: Ricker, Paul M.. University of Illinois at Urbana; Estados Unidos
Fil: Roy, Fabrice. Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7; Francia
Fil: Ruiz, Andrés Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Sgró, Mario Agustín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; Argentina
Fil: Springel, Volker. Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies; Alemania
Fil: Stadel, Joachim. Universitat Zurich; Suiza
Fil: Sutter, P. M.. University of Illinois at Urbana; Estados Unidos. Ohio State University; Estados Unidos. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; Francia
Fil: Tweed, Dylan. The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem; Israel
Fil: Zemp, Marcel. Peking University; República de China - Materia
-
GALAXIES EVOLUTION
GALAXIES HALOES
LUMINOSITY FUNCTION
GALAXIES STATISTICS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29314
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_43a247e29970be5f58ceef4b61193b6d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29314 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairsKnebe, AlexanderPearce, Frazer R.Lux, HanniAscasibar, YagoBehroozi, PeterCasado, JavierCorbett Moran, ChristineDiemand, JuergDolag, KlausDominguez Tenreiro, RosaElahi, PascalFalck, BridgetGottlober, StefanHan, JiaxinKlypin, AnatolyLukic, ZarijaMaciejewski, MichalMcBride, Cameron K.Merchan, Manuel EnriqueMuldrew, Stuart I.Neyrinck, MarkOnions, JulianPlanelles, SusanaPotter, DougQuilis, VicentRasera, YannRicker, Paul M.Roy, FabriceRuiz, Andrés NicolásSgró, Mario AgustínSpringel, VolkerStadel, JoachimSutter, P. M.Tweed, DylanZemp, MarcelGALAXIES EVOLUTIONGALAXIES HALOESLUMINOSITY FUNCTIONGALAXIES STATISTICShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The ever increasing size and complexity of data coming from simulations of cosmic structure formation demand equally sophisticated tools for their analysis. During the past decade, the art of object finding in these simulations has hence developed into an important discipline itself. A multitude of codes based upon a huge variety of methods and techniques have been spawned yet the question remained as to whether or not they will provide the same (physical) information about the structures of interest. Here we summarize and extent previous work of the ‘halo finder comparison project’: we investigate in detail the (possible) origin of any deviations across finders. To this extent, we decipher and discuss differences in halo-finding methods, clearly separating them from the disparity in definitions of halo properties. We observe that different codes not only find different numbers of objects leading to a scatter of up to 20 per cent in the halo mass and Vmax function, but also that the particulars of those objects that are identified by all finders differ. The strength of the variation, however, depends on the property studied, e.g. the scatter in position, bulk velocity, mass and the peak value of the rotation curve is practically below a few per cent, whereas derived quantities such as spin and shape show larger deviations. Our study indicates that the prime contribution to differences in halo properties across codes stems from the distinct particle collection methods and – to a minor extent – the particular aspects of how the procedure for removing unbound particles is implemented. We close with a discussion of the relevance and implications of the scatter across different codes for other fields such as semi-analytical galaxy formation models, gravitational lensing and observables in general.Fil: Knebe, Alexander. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Pearce, Frazer R.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino UnidoFil: Lux, Hanni. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Ascasibar, Yago. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Behroozi, Peter. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados UnidosFil: Casado, Javier. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Corbett Moran, Christine. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Diemand, Juerg. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Dolag, Klaus. Gobierno de la Republica Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut Fur Astrophysik; AlemaniaFil: Dominguez Tenreiro, Rosa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; EspañaFil: Elahi, Pascal. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory; ChinaFil: Falck, Bridget. University of Portsmouth; Reino UnidoFil: Gottlober, Stefan. Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam; AlemaniaFil: Han, Jiaxin. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory; China. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China. University Of Durham; Reino UnidoFil: Klypin, Anatoly. New Mexico State University; Estados UnidosFil: Lukic, Zarija. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Estados Unidos. Los Alamos National High Magnetic Field Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Maciejewski, Michal. Gobierno de la Republica Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut Fur Astrophysik; AlemaniaFil: McBride, Cameron K.. Vanderbilt University; Estados UnidosFil: Merchan, Manuel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Muldrew, Stuart I.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino UnidoFil: Neyrinck, Mark. University Johns Hopkins; Estados UnidosFil: Onions, Julian. The University Of Nottingham; Reino UnidoFil: Planelles, Susana. Università degli Studi di Trieste; ItaliaFil: Potter, Doug. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Quilis, Vicent. Universidad de Valencia; EspañaFil: Rasera, Yann. Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7; FranciaFil: Ricker, Paul M.. University of Illinois at Urbana; Estados UnidosFil: Roy, Fabrice. Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7; FranciaFil: Ruiz, Andrés Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Sgró, Mario Agustín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; ArgentinaFil: Springel, Volker. Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies; AlemaniaFil: Stadel, Joachim. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Sutter, P. M.. University of Illinois at Urbana; Estados Unidos. Ohio State University; Estados Unidos. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; FranciaFil: Tweed, Dylan. The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem; IsraelFil: Zemp, Marcel. Peking University; República de ChinaOxford University Press2013-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/29314Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Lux, Hanni; Ascasibar, Yago; Behroozi, Peter; et al.; Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs; Oxford University Press; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 435; 2; 10-2013; 1618-16580035-8711CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stt1403info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/435/2/1618/1043579info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0585info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:07:19Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/29314instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:07:19.509CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs |
title |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs |
spellingShingle |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs Knebe, Alexander GALAXIES EVOLUTION GALAXIES HALOES LUMINOSITY FUNCTION GALAXIES STATISTICS |
title_short |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs |
title_full |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs |
title_fullStr |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs |
title_sort |
Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Knebe, Alexander Pearce, Frazer R. Lux, Hanni Ascasibar, Yago Behroozi, Peter Casado, Javier Corbett Moran, Christine Diemand, Juerg Dolag, Klaus Dominguez Tenreiro, Rosa Elahi, Pascal Falck, Bridget Gottlober, Stefan Han, Jiaxin Klypin, Anatoly Lukic, Zarija Maciejewski, Michal McBride, Cameron K. Merchan, Manuel Enrique Muldrew, Stuart I. Neyrinck, Mark Onions, Julian Planelles, Susana Potter, Doug Quilis, Vicent Rasera, Yann Ricker, Paul M. Roy, Fabrice Ruiz, Andrés Nicolás Sgró, Mario Agustín Springel, Volker Stadel, Joachim Sutter, P. M. Tweed, Dylan Zemp, Marcel |
author |
Knebe, Alexander |
author_facet |
Knebe, Alexander Pearce, Frazer R. Lux, Hanni Ascasibar, Yago Behroozi, Peter Casado, Javier Corbett Moran, Christine Diemand, Juerg Dolag, Klaus Dominguez Tenreiro, Rosa Elahi, Pascal Falck, Bridget Gottlober, Stefan Han, Jiaxin Klypin, Anatoly Lukic, Zarija Maciejewski, Michal McBride, Cameron K. Merchan, Manuel Enrique Muldrew, Stuart I. Neyrinck, Mark Onions, Julian Planelles, Susana Potter, Doug Quilis, Vicent Rasera, Yann Ricker, Paul M. Roy, Fabrice Ruiz, Andrés Nicolás Sgró, Mario Agustín Springel, Volker Stadel, Joachim Sutter, P. M. Tweed, Dylan Zemp, Marcel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pearce, Frazer R. Lux, Hanni Ascasibar, Yago Behroozi, Peter Casado, Javier Corbett Moran, Christine Diemand, Juerg Dolag, Klaus Dominguez Tenreiro, Rosa Elahi, Pascal Falck, Bridget Gottlober, Stefan Han, Jiaxin Klypin, Anatoly Lukic, Zarija Maciejewski, Michal McBride, Cameron K. Merchan, Manuel Enrique Muldrew, Stuart I. Neyrinck, Mark Onions, Julian Planelles, Susana Potter, Doug Quilis, Vicent Rasera, Yann Ricker, Paul M. Roy, Fabrice Ruiz, Andrés Nicolás Sgró, Mario Agustín Springel, Volker Stadel, Joachim Sutter, P. M. Tweed, Dylan Zemp, Marcel |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
GALAXIES EVOLUTION GALAXIES HALOES LUMINOSITY FUNCTION GALAXIES STATISTICS |
topic |
GALAXIES EVOLUTION GALAXIES HALOES LUMINOSITY FUNCTION GALAXIES STATISTICS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The ever increasing size and complexity of data coming from simulations of cosmic structure formation demand equally sophisticated tools for their analysis. During the past decade, the art of object finding in these simulations has hence developed into an important discipline itself. A multitude of codes based upon a huge variety of methods and techniques have been spawned yet the question remained as to whether or not they will provide the same (physical) information about the structures of interest. Here we summarize and extent previous work of the ‘halo finder comparison project’: we investigate in detail the (possible) origin of any deviations across finders. To this extent, we decipher and discuss differences in halo-finding methods, clearly separating them from the disparity in definitions of halo properties. We observe that different codes not only find different numbers of objects leading to a scatter of up to 20 per cent in the halo mass and Vmax function, but also that the particulars of those objects that are identified by all finders differ. The strength of the variation, however, depends on the property studied, e.g. the scatter in position, bulk velocity, mass and the peak value of the rotation curve is practically below a few per cent, whereas derived quantities such as spin and shape show larger deviations. Our study indicates that the prime contribution to differences in halo properties across codes stems from the distinct particle collection methods and – to a minor extent – the particular aspects of how the procedure for removing unbound particles is implemented. We close with a discussion of the relevance and implications of the scatter across different codes for other fields such as semi-analytical galaxy formation models, gravitational lensing and observables in general. Fil: Knebe, Alexander. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España Fil: Pearce, Frazer R.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido Fil: Lux, Hanni. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido. University of Oxford; Reino Unido Fil: Ascasibar, Yago. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España Fil: Behroozi, Peter. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology; Estados Unidos. University of Stanford; Estados Unidos Fil: Casado, Javier. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España Fil: Corbett Moran, Christine. Universitat Zurich; Suiza Fil: Diemand, Juerg. Universitat Zurich; Suiza Fil: Dolag, Klaus. Gobierno de la Republica Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut Fur Astrophysik; Alemania Fil: Dominguez Tenreiro, Rosa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; España Fil: Elahi, Pascal. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory; China Fil: Falck, Bridget. University of Portsmouth; Reino Unido Fil: Gottlober, Stefan. Leibniz-Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam; Alemania Fil: Han, Jiaxin. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory; China. Chinese Academy of Sciences; República de China. University Of Durham; Reino Unido Fil: Klypin, Anatoly. New Mexico State University; Estados Unidos Fil: Lukic, Zarija. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Estados Unidos. Los Alamos National High Magnetic Field Laboratory; Estados Unidos Fil: Maciejewski, Michal. Gobierno de la Republica Federal de Alemania. Max Planck Institut Fur Astrophysik; Alemania Fil: McBride, Cameron K.. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos Fil: Merchan, Manuel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; Argentina Fil: Muldrew, Stuart I.. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido Fil: Neyrinck, Mark. University Johns Hopkins; Estados Unidos Fil: Onions, Julian. The University Of Nottingham; Reino Unido Fil: Planelles, Susana. Università degli Studi di Trieste; Italia Fil: Potter, Doug. Universitat Zurich; Suiza Fil: Quilis, Vicent. Universidad de Valencia; España Fil: Rasera, Yann. Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7; Francia Fil: Ricker, Paul M.. University of Illinois at Urbana; Estados Unidos Fil: Roy, Fabrice. Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7; Francia Fil: Ruiz, Andrés Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; Argentina Fil: Sgró, Mario Agustín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Observatorio Astronómico de Córdoba. Instituto de Astronomia Teórica y Experimental; Argentina Fil: Springel, Volker. Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies; Alemania Fil: Stadel, Joachim. Universitat Zurich; Suiza Fil: Sutter, P. M.. University of Illinois at Urbana; Estados Unidos. Ohio State University; Estados Unidos. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris; Francia Fil: Tweed, Dylan. The Hebrew University Of Jerusalem; Israel Fil: Zemp, Marcel. Peking University; República de China |
description |
The ever increasing size and complexity of data coming from simulations of cosmic structure formation demand equally sophisticated tools for their analysis. During the past decade, the art of object finding in these simulations has hence developed into an important discipline itself. A multitude of codes based upon a huge variety of methods and techniques have been spawned yet the question remained as to whether or not they will provide the same (physical) information about the structures of interest. Here we summarize and extent previous work of the ‘halo finder comparison project’: we investigate in detail the (possible) origin of any deviations across finders. To this extent, we decipher and discuss differences in halo-finding methods, clearly separating them from the disparity in definitions of halo properties. We observe that different codes not only find different numbers of objects leading to a scatter of up to 20 per cent in the halo mass and Vmax function, but also that the particulars of those objects that are identified by all finders differ. The strength of the variation, however, depends on the property studied, e.g. the scatter in position, bulk velocity, mass and the peak value of the rotation curve is practically below a few per cent, whereas derived quantities such as spin and shape show larger deviations. Our study indicates that the prime contribution to differences in halo properties across codes stems from the distinct particle collection methods and – to a minor extent – the particular aspects of how the procedure for removing unbound particles is implemented. We close with a discussion of the relevance and implications of the scatter across different codes for other fields such as semi-analytical galaxy formation models, gravitational lensing and observables in general. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/29314 Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Lux, Hanni; Ascasibar, Yago; Behroozi, Peter; et al.; Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs; Oxford University Press; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 435; 2; 10-2013; 1618-1658 0035-8711 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/29314 |
identifier_str_mv |
Knebe, Alexander; Pearce, Frazer R.; Lux, Hanni; Ascasibar, Yago; Behroozi, Peter; et al.; Structure finding in cosmological simulations: the state of affairs; Oxford University Press; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 435; 2; 10-2013; 1618-1658 0035-8711 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stt1403 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/435/2/1618/1043579 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.0585 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269998587838464 |
score |
13.13397 |