How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology

Autores
Pelegrin, Nicolas; Winemiller, Kirk Owen; Vitt, Laurie J.; Fitzgerald, Daniel B.; Pianka, Eric R
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: Environmental conditions on Earth are repeated in non-random patterns that often coincide with species from different regions and time periods having consistent combinations of morphological, physiological and behavioral traits. Observation of repeated trait combinations among species confronting similar environmental conditions suggest that adaptive trait combinations are constrained by functional tradeoffs within or across niche dimensions. In an earlier study, we assembled a high-resolution database of functional traits for 134 lizard species to explore ecological diversification in relation to five fundamental niche dimensions. Here we expand and further examine multivariate relationships in that dataset to assess the relative influence of niche dimensions on the distribution of species in 6-dimensional niche space and how these may deviate from distributions generated from null models. We then analyzed a dataset with lower functional-trait resolution for 1023 lizard species that was compiled from our dataset and a published database, representing most of the extant families and environmental conditions occupied by lizards globally. Ordinations from multivariate analysis were compared with null models to assess how ecological and historical factors have resulted in the conservation, divergence or convergence of lizard niches. Results: Lizard species clustered within a functional niche volume influenced mostly by functional traits associated with diet, activity, and habitat/substrate. Consistent patterns of trait combinations within and among niche dimensions yielded 24 functional groups that occupied a total niche space significantly smaller than plausible spaces projected by null models. Null model tests indicated that several functional groups are strongly constrained by phylogeny, such as nocturnality in the Gekkota and the secondarily acquired sit-and-wait foraging strategy in Iguania. Most of the widely distributed and species-rich families contained multiple functional groups thereby contributing to high incidence of niche convergence. Conclusions: Comparison of empirical patterns with those generated by null models suggests that ecological filters promote limited sets of trait combinations, especially where similar conditions occur, reflecting both niche convergence and conservatism. Widespread patterns of niche convergence following ancestral niche diversification support the idea that lizard niches are defined by trait-function relationships and interactions with environment that are, to some degree, predictable and independent of phylogeny.
Fil: Pelegrin, Nicolas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Winemiller, Kirk Owen. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vitt, Laurie J.. University Of Oklahoma; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fitzgerald, Daniel B.. United States Geological Survey; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pianka, Eric R. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Materia
ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE
EVOLUTIONARY CONVERGENCE
FUNCTIONAL GROUP
PERIODIC TABLE OF NICHES
PHYLOGENETIC NICHE CONSERVATISM
SAURIA
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184558

id CONICETDig_41b01924029b5152561a54a02c47708e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184558
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecologyPelegrin, NicolasWinemiller, Kirk OwenVitt, Laurie J.Fitzgerald, Daniel B.Pianka, Eric RADAPTIVE DIVERGENCEEVOLUTIONARY CONVERGENCEFUNCTIONAL GROUPPERIODIC TABLE OF NICHESPHYLOGENETIC NICHE CONSERVATISMSAURIAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Background: Environmental conditions on Earth are repeated in non-random patterns that often coincide with species from different regions and time periods having consistent combinations of morphological, physiological and behavioral traits. Observation of repeated trait combinations among species confronting similar environmental conditions suggest that adaptive trait combinations are constrained by functional tradeoffs within or across niche dimensions. In an earlier study, we assembled a high-resolution database of functional traits for 134 lizard species to explore ecological diversification in relation to five fundamental niche dimensions. Here we expand and further examine multivariate relationships in that dataset to assess the relative influence of niche dimensions on the distribution of species in 6-dimensional niche space and how these may deviate from distributions generated from null models. We then analyzed a dataset with lower functional-trait resolution for 1023 lizard species that was compiled from our dataset and a published database, representing most of the extant families and environmental conditions occupied by lizards globally. Ordinations from multivariate analysis were compared with null models to assess how ecological and historical factors have resulted in the conservation, divergence or convergence of lizard niches. Results: Lizard species clustered within a functional niche volume influenced mostly by functional traits associated with diet, activity, and habitat/substrate. Consistent patterns of trait combinations within and among niche dimensions yielded 24 functional groups that occupied a total niche space significantly smaller than plausible spaces projected by null models. Null model tests indicated that several functional groups are strongly constrained by phylogeny, such as nocturnality in the Gekkota and the secondarily acquired sit-and-wait foraging strategy in Iguania. Most of the widely distributed and species-rich families contained multiple functional groups thereby contributing to high incidence of niche convergence. Conclusions: Comparison of empirical patterns with those generated by null models suggests that ecological filters promote limited sets of trait combinations, especially where similar conditions occur, reflecting both niche convergence and conservatism. Widespread patterns of niche convergence following ancestral niche diversification support the idea that lizard niches are defined by trait-function relationships and interactions with environment that are, to some degree, predictable and independent of phylogeny.Fil: Pelegrin, Nicolas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Winemiller, Kirk Owen. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Vitt, Laurie J.. University Of Oklahoma; Estados UnidosFil: Fitzgerald, Daniel B.. United States Geological Survey; Estados UnidosFil: Pianka, Eric R. University of Texas at Austin; Estados UnidosBioMed Central2021-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/184558Pelegrin, Nicolas; Winemiller, Kirk Owen; Vitt, Laurie J.; Fitzgerald, Daniel B.; Pianka, Eric R; How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology; BioMed Central; BMC Ecology and Evolution; 21; 1; 7-2021; 1-132730-7182CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-021-01877-8info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s12862-021-01877-8info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:22:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/184558instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:22:48.877CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
title How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
spellingShingle How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
Pelegrin, Nicolas
ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE
EVOLUTIONARY CONVERGENCE
FUNCTIONAL GROUP
PERIODIC TABLE OF NICHES
PHYLOGENETIC NICHE CONSERVATISM
SAURIA
title_short How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
title_full How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
title_fullStr How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
title_full_unstemmed How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
title_sort How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pelegrin, Nicolas
Winemiller, Kirk Owen
Vitt, Laurie J.
Fitzgerald, Daniel B.
Pianka, Eric R
author Pelegrin, Nicolas
author_facet Pelegrin, Nicolas
Winemiller, Kirk Owen
Vitt, Laurie J.
Fitzgerald, Daniel B.
Pianka, Eric R
author_role author
author2 Winemiller, Kirk Owen
Vitt, Laurie J.
Fitzgerald, Daniel B.
Pianka, Eric R
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE
EVOLUTIONARY CONVERGENCE
FUNCTIONAL GROUP
PERIODIC TABLE OF NICHES
PHYLOGENETIC NICHE CONSERVATISM
SAURIA
topic ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE
EVOLUTIONARY CONVERGENCE
FUNCTIONAL GROUP
PERIODIC TABLE OF NICHES
PHYLOGENETIC NICHE CONSERVATISM
SAURIA
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: Environmental conditions on Earth are repeated in non-random patterns that often coincide with species from different regions and time periods having consistent combinations of morphological, physiological and behavioral traits. Observation of repeated trait combinations among species confronting similar environmental conditions suggest that adaptive trait combinations are constrained by functional tradeoffs within or across niche dimensions. In an earlier study, we assembled a high-resolution database of functional traits for 134 lizard species to explore ecological diversification in relation to five fundamental niche dimensions. Here we expand and further examine multivariate relationships in that dataset to assess the relative influence of niche dimensions on the distribution of species in 6-dimensional niche space and how these may deviate from distributions generated from null models. We then analyzed a dataset with lower functional-trait resolution for 1023 lizard species that was compiled from our dataset and a published database, representing most of the extant families and environmental conditions occupied by lizards globally. Ordinations from multivariate analysis were compared with null models to assess how ecological and historical factors have resulted in the conservation, divergence or convergence of lizard niches. Results: Lizard species clustered within a functional niche volume influenced mostly by functional traits associated with diet, activity, and habitat/substrate. Consistent patterns of trait combinations within and among niche dimensions yielded 24 functional groups that occupied a total niche space significantly smaller than plausible spaces projected by null models. Null model tests indicated that several functional groups are strongly constrained by phylogeny, such as nocturnality in the Gekkota and the secondarily acquired sit-and-wait foraging strategy in Iguania. Most of the widely distributed and species-rich families contained multiple functional groups thereby contributing to high incidence of niche convergence. Conclusions: Comparison of empirical patterns with those generated by null models suggests that ecological filters promote limited sets of trait combinations, especially where similar conditions occur, reflecting both niche convergence and conservatism. Widespread patterns of niche convergence following ancestral niche diversification support the idea that lizard niches are defined by trait-function relationships and interactions with environment that are, to some degree, predictable and independent of phylogeny.
Fil: Pelegrin, Nicolas. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Winemiller, Kirk Owen. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vitt, Laurie J.. University Of Oklahoma; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fitzgerald, Daniel B.. United States Geological Survey; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pianka, Eric R. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
description Background: Environmental conditions on Earth are repeated in non-random patterns that often coincide with species from different regions and time periods having consistent combinations of morphological, physiological and behavioral traits. Observation of repeated trait combinations among species confronting similar environmental conditions suggest that adaptive trait combinations are constrained by functional tradeoffs within or across niche dimensions. In an earlier study, we assembled a high-resolution database of functional traits for 134 lizard species to explore ecological diversification in relation to five fundamental niche dimensions. Here we expand and further examine multivariate relationships in that dataset to assess the relative influence of niche dimensions on the distribution of species in 6-dimensional niche space and how these may deviate from distributions generated from null models. We then analyzed a dataset with lower functional-trait resolution for 1023 lizard species that was compiled from our dataset and a published database, representing most of the extant families and environmental conditions occupied by lizards globally. Ordinations from multivariate analysis were compared with null models to assess how ecological and historical factors have resulted in the conservation, divergence or convergence of lizard niches. Results: Lizard species clustered within a functional niche volume influenced mostly by functional traits associated with diet, activity, and habitat/substrate. Consistent patterns of trait combinations within and among niche dimensions yielded 24 functional groups that occupied a total niche space significantly smaller than plausible spaces projected by null models. Null model tests indicated that several functional groups are strongly constrained by phylogeny, such as nocturnality in the Gekkota and the secondarily acquired sit-and-wait foraging strategy in Iguania. Most of the widely distributed and species-rich families contained multiple functional groups thereby contributing to high incidence of niche convergence. Conclusions: Comparison of empirical patterns with those generated by null models suggests that ecological filters promote limited sets of trait combinations, especially where similar conditions occur, reflecting both niche convergence and conservatism. Widespread patterns of niche convergence following ancestral niche diversification support the idea that lizard niches are defined by trait-function relationships and interactions with environment that are, to some degree, predictable and independent of phylogeny.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184558
Pelegrin, Nicolas; Winemiller, Kirk Owen; Vitt, Laurie J.; Fitzgerald, Daniel B.; Pianka, Eric R; How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology; BioMed Central; BMC Ecology and Evolution; 21; 1; 7-2021; 1-13
2730-7182
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/184558
identifier_str_mv Pelegrin, Nicolas; Winemiller, Kirk Owen; Vitt, Laurie J.; Fitzgerald, Daniel B.; Pianka, Eric R; How do lizard niches conserve, diverge or converge? Further exploration of saurian evolutionary ecology; BioMed Central; BMC Ecology and Evolution; 21; 1; 7-2021; 1-13
2730-7182
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bmcevolbiol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12862-021-01877-8
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s12862-021-01877-8
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842981257173008384
score 12.48226