El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte

Autores
Napoli, Santiago Juan
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This paper aims to inquire Novalis’ philosophical, theological and political readings about the controversy that involved Johann Gottlieb Fichte and ended up with his removal as a profesor at the University of Jena, the so-called Atheismusstreit. The article’s main thesis statement affirms that Novalis possesses a truly detailed knowledge of the discussions within this controversy. At the same time, and with certain nuances, he exhibites a considerable political and philosophical affinity with Fichte’s plea. In order to demonstrate this statement, we examine Novalis’ correspondence, alongside two of his main works: Das Allgemeine Brouillon. Materialien zur Enzyklopädistik and Die Christenheit oder Europa, both belonging to 1799, the year in which the controversy primarily took place.
Fil: Napoli, Santiago Juan. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
Materia
GOD
ATHEISM
CHRISTIANITY
CENSORSHIP
HARDENBERG
IDEALISM
FICHTE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/138709
Acceder
id CONICETDig_3bc1d3d79a8576f154898ad9d45e39a0
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/138709
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de FichteNapoli, Santiago JuanGODATHEISMCHRISTIANITYCENSORSHIPHARDENBERGIDEALISMFICHTEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This paper aims to inquire Novalis’ philosophical, theological and political readings about the controversy that involved Johann Gottlieb Fichte and ended up with his removal as a profesor at the University of Jena, the so-called Atheismusstreit. The article’s main thesis statement affirms that Novalis possesses a truly detailed knowledge of the discussions within this controversy. At the same time, and with certain nuances, he exhibites a considerable political and philosophical affinity with Fichte’s plea. In order to demonstrate this statement, we examine Novalis’ correspondence, alongside two of his main works: Das Allgemeine Brouillon. Materialien zur Enzyklopädistik and Die Christenheit oder Europa, both belonging to 1799, the year in which the controversy primarily took place.Fil: Napoli, Santiago Juan. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; ArgentinaEuroPhilosophie2021-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/138709Napoli, Santiago Juan; El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte; EuroPhilosophie; Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte; 21; 6-2021; 1-152258-014XCONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/ref.1614info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/ref/1614info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-26T08:58:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/138709instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-26 08:58:00.995CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
title El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
spellingShingle El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
Napoli, Santiago Juan
GOD
ATHEISM
CHRISTIANITY
CENSORSHIP
HARDENBERG
IDEALISM
FICHTE
title_short El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
title_full El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
title_fullStr El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
title_full_unstemmed El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
title_sort El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Napoli, Santiago Juan
author Napoli, Santiago Juan
author_facet Napoli, Santiago Juan
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv GOD
ATHEISM
CHRISTIANITY
CENSORSHIP
HARDENBERG
IDEALISM
FICHTE
topic GOD
ATHEISM
CHRISTIANITY
CENSORSHIP
HARDENBERG
IDEALISM
FICHTE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This paper aims to inquire Novalis’ philosophical, theological and political readings about the controversy that involved Johann Gottlieb Fichte and ended up with his removal as a profesor at the University of Jena, the so-called Atheismusstreit. The article’s main thesis statement affirms that Novalis possesses a truly detailed knowledge of the discussions within this controversy. At the same time, and with certain nuances, he exhibites a considerable political and philosophical affinity with Fichte’s plea. In order to demonstrate this statement, we examine Novalis’ correspondence, alongside two of his main works: Das Allgemeine Brouillon. Materialien zur Enzyklopädistik and Die Christenheit oder Europa, both belonging to 1799, the year in which the controversy primarily took place.
Fil: Napoli, Santiago Juan. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Humanidades; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca; Argentina
description This paper aims to inquire Novalis’ philosophical, theological and political readings about the controversy that involved Johann Gottlieb Fichte and ended up with his removal as a profesor at the University of Jena, the so-called Atheismusstreit. The article’s main thesis statement affirms that Novalis possesses a truly detailed knowledge of the discussions within this controversy. At the same time, and with certain nuances, he exhibites a considerable political and philosophical affinity with Fichte’s plea. In order to demonstrate this statement, we examine Novalis’ correspondence, alongside two of his main works: Das Allgemeine Brouillon. Materialien zur Enzyklopädistik and Die Christenheit oder Europa, both belonging to 1799, the year in which the controversy primarily took place.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/138709
Napoli, Santiago Juan; El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte; EuroPhilosophie; Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte; 21; 6-2021; 1-15
2258-014X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/138709
identifier_str_mv Napoli, Santiago Juan; El profesor, el teólogo y el político: Novalis frente al Atheismusstreit de Fichte; EuroPhilosophie; Revista de Estud(i)os sobre Fichte; 21; 6-2021; 1-15
2258-014X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/ref.1614
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/ref/1614
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EuroPhilosophie
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EuroPhilosophie
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1849873232314761216
score 13.011256

Publicaciones similares