Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
- Autores
- Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; Andrew Tamburri, Damian
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment.
Fil: Garriga, Martín. Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Dalla Palma, Stefano. Tilburg School of Economics and Management; Países Bajos
Fil: Arias, Maxmiliano. No especifíca;
Fil: de Renzis, Alan Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pareschi, Remo. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia
Fil: Andrew Tamburri, Damian. Jheronimus Academy of Data Science; Países Bajos - Materia
-
BLOCKCHAIN
CRYPTOCURRENCIES
FRAMEWORK
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169064
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_3b1e95d1a79a83e50852e2756c5d8034 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169064 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture driversGarriga, MartínDalla Palma, StefanoArias, Maxmilianode Renzis, Alan IsmaelPareschi, RemoAndrew Tamburri, DamianBLOCKCHAINCRYPTOCURRENCIESFRAMEWORKSOFTWARE ARCHITECTUREShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment.Fil: Garriga, Martín. Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Dalla Palma, Stefano. Tilburg School of Economics and Management; Países BajosFil: Arias, Maxmiliano. No especifíca;Fil: de Renzis, Alan Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Pareschi, Remo. Università degli Studi del Molise; ItaliaFil: Andrew Tamburri, Damian. Jheronimus Academy of Data Science; Países BajosJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd2020-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/169064Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; et al.; Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience; 8-2020; 1-211532-0626CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/cpe.5992info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:14:17Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169064instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:14:17.548CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers |
title |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers |
spellingShingle |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers Garriga, Martín BLOCKCHAIN CRYPTOCURRENCIES FRAMEWORK SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES |
title_short |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers |
title_full |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers |
title_fullStr |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers |
title_sort |
Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Garriga, Martín Dalla Palma, Stefano Arias, Maxmiliano de Renzis, Alan Ismael Pareschi, Remo Andrew Tamburri, Damian |
author |
Garriga, Martín |
author_facet |
Garriga, Martín Dalla Palma, Stefano Arias, Maxmiliano de Renzis, Alan Ismael Pareschi, Remo Andrew Tamburri, Damian |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dalla Palma, Stefano Arias, Maxmiliano de Renzis, Alan Ismael Pareschi, Remo Andrew Tamburri, Damian |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
BLOCKCHAIN CRYPTOCURRENCIES FRAMEWORK SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES |
topic |
BLOCKCHAIN CRYPTOCURRENCIES FRAMEWORK SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment. Fil: Garriga, Martín. Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Dalla Palma, Stefano. Tilburg School of Economics and Management; Países Bajos Fil: Arias, Maxmiliano. No especifíca; Fil: de Renzis, Alan Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Pareschi, Remo. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia Fil: Andrew Tamburri, Damian. Jheronimus Academy of Data Science; Países Bajos |
description |
Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169064 Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; et al.; Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience; 8-2020; 1-21 1532-0626 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169064 |
identifier_str_mv |
Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; et al.; Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience; 8-2020; 1-21 1532-0626 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/cpe.5992 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614069023145984 |
score |
13.070432 |