Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers

Autores
Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; Andrew Tamburri, Damian
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment.
Fil: Garriga, Martín. Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Dalla Palma, Stefano. Tilburg School of Economics and Management; Países Bajos
Fil: Arias, Maxmiliano. No especifíca;
Fil: de Renzis, Alan Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pareschi, Remo. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia
Fil: Andrew Tamburri, Damian. Jheronimus Academy of Data Science; Países Bajos
Materia
BLOCKCHAIN
CRYPTOCURRENCIES
FRAMEWORK
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169064
Acceder
id CONICETDig_3b1e95d1a79a83e50852e2756c5d8034
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169064
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture driversGarriga, MartínDalla Palma, StefanoArias, Maxmilianode Renzis, Alan IsmaelPareschi, RemoAndrew Tamburri, DamianBLOCKCHAINCRYPTOCURRENCIESFRAMEWORKSOFTWARE ARCHITECTUREShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment.Fil: Garriga, Martín. Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Dalla Palma, Stefano. Tilburg School of Economics and Management; Países BajosFil: Arias, Maxmiliano. No especifíca;Fil: de Renzis, Alan Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Pareschi, Remo. Università degli Studi del Molise; ItaliaFil: Andrew Tamburri, Damian. Jheronimus Academy of Data Science; Países BajosJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd2020-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/169064Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; et al.; Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience; 8-2020; 1-211532-0626CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/cpe.5992info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:44:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/169064instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:44:22.439CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
title Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
spellingShingle Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
Garriga, Martín
BLOCKCHAIN
CRYPTOCURRENCIES
FRAMEWORK
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES
title_short Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
title_full Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
title_fullStr Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
title_full_unstemmed Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
title_sort Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Garriga, Martín
Dalla Palma, Stefano
Arias, Maxmiliano
de Renzis, Alan Ismael
Pareschi, Remo
Andrew Tamburri, Damian
author Garriga, Martín
author_facet Garriga, Martín
Dalla Palma, Stefano
Arias, Maxmiliano
de Renzis, Alan Ismael
Pareschi, Remo
Andrew Tamburri, Damian
author_role author
author2 Dalla Palma, Stefano
Arias, Maxmiliano
de Renzis, Alan Ismael
Pareschi, Remo
Andrew Tamburri, Damian
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv BLOCKCHAIN
CRYPTOCURRENCIES
FRAMEWORK
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES
topic BLOCKCHAIN
CRYPTOCURRENCIES
FRAMEWORK
SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment.
Fil: Garriga, Martín. Universidad Nacional del Comahue; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Dalla Palma, Stefano. Tilburg School of Economics and Management; Países Bajos
Fil: Arias, Maxmiliano. No especifíca;
Fil: de Renzis, Alan Ismael. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pareschi, Remo. Università degli Studi del Molise; Italia
Fil: Andrew Tamburri, Damian. Jheronimus Academy of Data Science; Países Bajos
description Blockchain is a decentralized transaction and data management solution, the technological leap behind the success of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. As the variety of existing blockchains and distributed ledgers continues to increase, adopters should focus on selecting the solution that best fits their needs and the requirements of their decentralized applications, rather than developing yet another blockchain from scratch. In this article we present a conceptual framework to aid software architects, developers, and decision makers to adopt the right blockchain technology. The framework exposes the interrelation between technological decisions and architectural features, capturing the knowledge from existing academic literature, industrial products, technical forums/blogs, and experts´ feedback. We empirically show the applicability of our framework by dissecting the platforms behind Bitcoin and other top 10 cryptocurrencies, aided by a focus group with researchers and industry practitioners. Then, we leverage the framework together with key notions of the architectural tradeoff analysis method to analyze four real-world blockchain case studies from industry and academia. Results shown that applying our framework leads to a deeper understanding of the architectural tradeoffs, allowing to assess technologies more objectively and select the one that best fit developers´ needs, ultimately cutting costs, reducing time-to-market and accelerating return on investment.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169064
Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; et al.; Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience; 8-2020; 1-21
1532-0626
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/169064
identifier_str_mv Garriga, Martín; Dalla Palma, Stefano; Arias, Maxmiliano; de Renzis, Alan Ismael; Pareschi, Remo; et al.; Blockchain and cryptocurrencies: A classification and comparison of architecture drivers; John Wiley & Sons Ltd; Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience; 8-2020; 1-21
1532-0626
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/cpe.5992
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782137968099328
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares