Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula

Autores
Hamilton, Maria; Jae Choi, Chang; Charmaine, Cheuk Man Yung; Mascioni, Martina; Vernet, Maria; Worden, Alexandra
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The West Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is considered vulnerable to warming, yet we still know little about the molecular diversity of the phytoplankton inhabiting WAP fjords. We examined phytoplankton community structure during two WAP expeditions using 16S rRNA gene V1-V2 amplicon sequencing, phylogenetic analyses and flow cytometric cell enumeration. Samples were collected from Andvord Bay in austral spring and fall (2015-2016). While abundant taxa in plastid-derived amplicons included prasinophyte and prymnesiophyte algae, the majority of samples were dominated by either cryptophyte or stramenopile amplicons. The stramenopiles consisted of diatoms, dictyochophytes, pelagophytes, and bolidophytes, and made up the bulk of the phytoplankton amplicons during fall, a period when phytoplankton cell counts were low. In contrast, spring phytoplankton counts ranged up to 10,204 cells/mL and most stations were dominated by cryptophytes (up to 3,088 cells/mL) which formed 12.5% of cytometry-based cell counts at the surface. Cryptophytes within the Geminigera/Teleaulax clade had the highest relative plastid amplicon abundances (up to 90%) at the majority of inner bay stations, with diatoms increasing in the outer bay and strait. Characterization by 16S and 18S full-length gene sequencing and electron microscopy revealed that these cryptophytes are different from cultured taxa and morphologically characterized Antarctic chryptophytes. Both the relative cryptophyte amplicon abundance, as well as the flow cytometric based cryptophyte cell abundance, showed a positive correlation with chlorophyll concentration (r=0.51, p-value< 0.05, and r=0.59, p-value<0.05, respectively). Thus it appears that one of the key phytoplankton taxa in this sensitive environment may be a previously uncharacterized species, who’s ecological and biogeochemical role should further be examined.
Fil: Hamilton, Maria. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jae Choi, Chang. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Charmaine, Cheuk Man Yung. The Hong Kong University Of Science And Technology; Hong Kong
Fil: Mascioni, Martina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Ficología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Vernet, Maria. University of California at San Diego. Scripps Institution of Oceanography; Estados Unidos
Fil: Worden, Alexandra. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute; Estados Unidos
Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020
Estados Unidos
Ocean Sciences Meeting
Materia
WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA
CRYPTOPHYTES
16S SRNA
STRAMENOPILES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155171

id CONICETDig_3985cee7f6399552eabb7db93aea774b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155171
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic PeninsulaHamilton, MariaJae Choi, ChangCharmaine, Cheuk Man YungMascioni, MartinaVernet, MariaWorden, AlexandraWESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULACRYPTOPHYTES16S SRNASTRAMENOPILEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The West Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is considered vulnerable to warming, yet we still know little about the molecular diversity of the phytoplankton inhabiting WAP fjords. We examined phytoplankton community structure during two WAP expeditions using 16S rRNA gene V1-V2 amplicon sequencing, phylogenetic analyses and flow cytometric cell enumeration. Samples were collected from Andvord Bay in austral spring and fall (2015-2016). While abundant taxa in plastid-derived amplicons included prasinophyte and prymnesiophyte algae, the majority of samples were dominated by either cryptophyte or stramenopile amplicons. The stramenopiles consisted of diatoms, dictyochophytes, pelagophytes, and bolidophytes, and made up the bulk of the phytoplankton amplicons during fall, a period when phytoplankton cell counts were low. In contrast, spring phytoplankton counts ranged up to 10,204 cells/mL and most stations were dominated by cryptophytes (up to 3,088 cells/mL) which formed 12.5% of cytometry-based cell counts at the surface. Cryptophytes within the Geminigera/Teleaulax clade had the highest relative plastid amplicon abundances (up to 90%) at the majority of inner bay stations, with diatoms increasing in the outer bay and strait. Characterization by 16S and 18S full-length gene sequencing and electron microscopy revealed that these cryptophytes are different from cultured taxa and morphologically characterized Antarctic chryptophytes. Both the relative cryptophyte amplicon abundance, as well as the flow cytometric based cryptophyte cell abundance, showed a positive correlation with chlorophyll concentration (r=0.51, p-value< 0.05, and r=0.59, p-value<0.05, respectively). Thus it appears that one of the key phytoplankton taxa in this sensitive environment may be a previously uncharacterized species, who’s ecological and biogeochemical role should further be examined.Fil: Hamilton, Maria. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Jae Choi, Chang. University of Texas at Austin; Estados UnidosFil: Charmaine, Cheuk Man Yung. The Hong Kong University Of Science And Technology; Hong KongFil: Mascioni, Martina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Ficología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Vernet, Maria. University of California at San Diego. Scripps Institution of Oceanography; Estados UnidosFil: Worden, Alexandra. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute; Estados UnidosOcean Sciences Meeting 2020Estados UnidosOcean Sciences MeetingAmerican Geophysical Union2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectCongresoBookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/155171Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula; Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020; Estados Unidos; 2020; 1-1CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://agu.confex.com/agu/osm20/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/645385Internacionalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:08:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/155171instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:08:45.68CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
title Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
spellingShingle Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
Hamilton, Maria
WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA
CRYPTOPHYTES
16S SRNA
STRAMENOPILES
title_short Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
title_full Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
title_fullStr Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
title_full_unstemmed Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
title_sort Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hamilton, Maria
Jae Choi, Chang
Charmaine, Cheuk Man Yung
Mascioni, Martina
Vernet, Maria
Worden, Alexandra
author Hamilton, Maria
author_facet Hamilton, Maria
Jae Choi, Chang
Charmaine, Cheuk Man Yung
Mascioni, Martina
Vernet, Maria
Worden, Alexandra
author_role author
author2 Jae Choi, Chang
Charmaine, Cheuk Man Yung
Mascioni, Martina
Vernet, Maria
Worden, Alexandra
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA
CRYPTOPHYTES
16S SRNA
STRAMENOPILES
topic WESTERN ANTARCTIC PENINSULA
CRYPTOPHYTES
16S SRNA
STRAMENOPILES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The West Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is considered vulnerable to warming, yet we still know little about the molecular diversity of the phytoplankton inhabiting WAP fjords. We examined phytoplankton community structure during two WAP expeditions using 16S rRNA gene V1-V2 amplicon sequencing, phylogenetic analyses and flow cytometric cell enumeration. Samples were collected from Andvord Bay in austral spring and fall (2015-2016). While abundant taxa in plastid-derived amplicons included prasinophyte and prymnesiophyte algae, the majority of samples were dominated by either cryptophyte or stramenopile amplicons. The stramenopiles consisted of diatoms, dictyochophytes, pelagophytes, and bolidophytes, and made up the bulk of the phytoplankton amplicons during fall, a period when phytoplankton cell counts were low. In contrast, spring phytoplankton counts ranged up to 10,204 cells/mL and most stations were dominated by cryptophytes (up to 3,088 cells/mL) which formed 12.5% of cytometry-based cell counts at the surface. Cryptophytes within the Geminigera/Teleaulax clade had the highest relative plastid amplicon abundances (up to 90%) at the majority of inner bay stations, with diatoms increasing in the outer bay and strait. Characterization by 16S and 18S full-length gene sequencing and electron microscopy revealed that these cryptophytes are different from cultured taxa and morphologically characterized Antarctic chryptophytes. Both the relative cryptophyte amplicon abundance, as well as the flow cytometric based cryptophyte cell abundance, showed a positive correlation with chlorophyll concentration (r=0.51, p-value< 0.05, and r=0.59, p-value<0.05, respectively). Thus it appears that one of the key phytoplankton taxa in this sensitive environment may be a previously uncharacterized species, who’s ecological and biogeochemical role should further be examined.
Fil: Hamilton, Maria. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jae Choi, Chang. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Charmaine, Cheuk Man Yung. The Hong Kong University Of Science And Technology; Hong Kong
Fil: Mascioni, Martina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. División Ficología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Vernet, Maria. University of California at San Diego. Scripps Institution of Oceanography; Estados Unidos
Fil: Worden, Alexandra. Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute; Estados Unidos
Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020
Estados Unidos
Ocean Sciences Meeting
description The West Antarctic Peninsula (WAP) is considered vulnerable to warming, yet we still know little about the molecular diversity of the phytoplankton inhabiting WAP fjords. We examined phytoplankton community structure during two WAP expeditions using 16S rRNA gene V1-V2 amplicon sequencing, phylogenetic analyses and flow cytometric cell enumeration. Samples were collected from Andvord Bay in austral spring and fall (2015-2016). While abundant taxa in plastid-derived amplicons included prasinophyte and prymnesiophyte algae, the majority of samples were dominated by either cryptophyte or stramenopile amplicons. The stramenopiles consisted of diatoms, dictyochophytes, pelagophytes, and bolidophytes, and made up the bulk of the phytoplankton amplicons during fall, a period when phytoplankton cell counts were low. In contrast, spring phytoplankton counts ranged up to 10,204 cells/mL and most stations were dominated by cryptophytes (up to 3,088 cells/mL) which formed 12.5% of cytometry-based cell counts at the surface. Cryptophytes within the Geminigera/Teleaulax clade had the highest relative plastid amplicon abundances (up to 90%) at the majority of inner bay stations, with diatoms increasing in the outer bay and strait. Characterization by 16S and 18S full-length gene sequencing and electron microscopy revealed that these cryptophytes are different from cultured taxa and morphologically characterized Antarctic chryptophytes. Both the relative cryptophyte amplicon abundance, as well as the flow cytometric based cryptophyte cell abundance, showed a positive correlation with chlorophyll concentration (r=0.51, p-value< 0.05, and r=0.59, p-value<0.05, respectively). Thus it appears that one of the key phytoplankton taxa in this sensitive environment may be a previously uncharacterized species, who’s ecological and biogeochemical role should further be examined.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
Congreso
Book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
status_str publishedVersion
format conferenceObject
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155171
Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula; Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020; Estados Unidos; 2020; 1-1
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/155171
identifier_str_mv Phytoplankton Community Structure Across a Fjord in the West Antarctic Peninsula; Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020; Estados Unidos; 2020; 1-1
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://agu.confex.com/agu/osm20/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/645385
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Internacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Geophysical Union
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Geophysical Union
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613958529449984
score 13.070432