The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
- Autores
- Sacchi, Emiliano
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics.
Fil: Sacchi, Emiliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte; Argentina - Materia
-
Biopolitics
Security Mechanism
Power
Governmentality - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9832
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_36128de73e1514149341417cd2ff892c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9832 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanismsSacchi, EmilianoBiopoliticsSecurity MechanismPowerGovernmentalityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics.Fil: Sacchi, Emiliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaWiley2011-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/9832Sacchi, Emiliano; The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms; Wiley; International Social Science Journal; 62; 205-206; 9-2011; 391-4020020-87011468-2451enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/issj.12009/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/issj.12009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:27:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9832instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:27:50.091CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms |
title |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms |
spellingShingle |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms Sacchi, Emiliano Biopolitics Security Mechanism Power Governmentality |
title_short |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms |
title_full |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms |
title_fullStr |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms |
title_sort |
The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Sacchi, Emiliano |
author |
Sacchi, Emiliano |
author_facet |
Sacchi, Emiliano |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Biopolitics Security Mechanism Power Governmentality |
topic |
Biopolitics Security Mechanism Power Governmentality |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics. Fil: Sacchi, Emiliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte; Argentina |
description |
This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9832 Sacchi, Emiliano; The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms; Wiley; International Social Science Journal; 62; 205-206; 9-2011; 391-402 0020-8701 1468-2451 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9832 |
identifier_str_mv |
Sacchi, Emiliano; The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms; Wiley; International Social Science Journal; 62; 205-206; 9-2011; 391-402 0020-8701 1468-2451 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/issj.12009/abstract info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/issj.12009 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083419618934784 |
score |
13.22299 |