The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms

Autores
Sacchi, Emiliano
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics.
Fil: Sacchi, Emiliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Materia
Biopolitics
Security Mechanism
Power
Governmentality
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9832

id CONICETDig_36128de73e1514149341417cd2ff892c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9832
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanismsSacchi, EmilianoBiopoliticsSecurity MechanismPowerGovernmentalityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics.Fil: Sacchi, Emiliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaWiley2011-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/9832Sacchi, Emiliano; The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms; Wiley; International Social Science Journal; 62; 205-206; 9-2011; 391-4020020-87011468-2451enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/issj.12009/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/issj.12009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:27:49Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/9832instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:27:50.091CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
title The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
spellingShingle The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
Sacchi, Emiliano
Biopolitics
Security Mechanism
Power
Governmentality
title_short The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
title_full The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
title_fullStr The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
title_sort The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sacchi, Emiliano
author Sacchi, Emiliano
author_facet Sacchi, Emiliano
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biopolitics
Security Mechanism
Power
Governmentality
topic Biopolitics
Security Mechanism
Power
Governmentality
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics.
Fil: Sacchi, Emiliano. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte; Argentina
description This article proposes a way of problematising the concept of biopolitics based on foucauldian and post-foucauldian reflection in order to steer the question towards the meaning of biopolitics, we take as our starting point the relationship between philosphy and the present, as understood by Michel Foucault. From there, a series of questions are posed around the paradoxical economics of relationships between Bios and Thanatos and their varios reading by Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben, and Roberto Esposito. On this subject, the links between biopolitics and racist and immunity apparatuses are explored. It is posited that although both apparatuses are fundamental to the modern biopolitical diagram, the Foucauldian concept of biopolitics cannot be reduced to them alone. Consquently, a hypothesis is proposed that biopolitics and the very notion of life cannot be understood without taking into a count the emergence of the concept of "population" and the mutiple "security mechanisms". Only through those security mechanisms it is possible to perceive the paradoxical structure of biopolitics.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9832
Sacchi, Emiliano; The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms; Wiley; International Social Science Journal; 62; 205-206; 9-2011; 391-402
0020-8701
1468-2451
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/9832
identifier_str_mv Sacchi, Emiliano; The biopolitical paradox: population and security mechanisms; Wiley; International Social Science Journal; 62; 205-206; 9-2011; 391-402
0020-8701
1468-2451
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/issj.12009/abstract
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/issj.12009
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083419618934784
score 13.22299