Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders

Autores
Almada, Melina Soledad; Gonzalez, Alda; Corronca, Jose Antonio
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Sustainable agro-ecological design is challenging when the goal is self-regulation of the system. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the agropastoral design system affects the spider community, as spiders are the main predators in these production systems, and to determine those designs which maximize the diversity and density of spiders. The study was conducted during 2009/2010, at the Experimental Research Station of Agriculture (EEA-INTA) Reconquista (Santa Fe, Argentina) where we considered four different designs: C1 (five agricultural fields), C2 (three agricultural fields and fourlivestock fields), C3 (six agricultural fields and one livestock field) and C4 (five agricultural fields and one forest area). In each design, the spiders were collected by pitfall traps and suction samples with a G-Vac (garden-vacuum). The designs proposed were considered on the basis of environmental heterogeneity. The C4 treatment had the greatest number of species, followed by C2, C3 and C1 (183, 178, 144 and 14 species, respectively), and C2 presented the greatest abundance of spiders followed by C4, C3 and C1 (n=5708, 4785, 4271 and 3448, respectively). Eight guilds were present in C3 and C4. This study is the first to evaluate the diversity of spiders in agropastoral systems in Argentina. Our results show that designs that include more fields with livestock orequal to those for agriculture, as well as forest areas, increase environmental heterogeneity. Therefore, the presence of a biological controller and dominant predatory group will be possible with sustainable designs that have environmental heterogeneity, contributing to improved pest control in agricultural systems.
Fil: Almada, Melina Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gonzalez, Alda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Corronca, Jose Antonio. Universidad Nacional de Salta; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
AGRO-ECOLOGICAL DESIGN
ARANEOFAUNA
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/64122
Acceder
id CONICETDig_2f2853e730d1363ca84c1e09162dfc1a
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/64122
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spidersAlmada, Melina SoledadGonzalez, AldaCorronca, Jose AntonioAGRO-ECOLOGICAL DESIGNARANEOFAUNABIOLOGICAL CONTROLENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Sustainable agro-ecological design is challenging when the goal is self-regulation of the system. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the agropastoral design system affects the spider community, as spiders are the main predators in these production systems, and to determine those designs which maximize the diversity and density of spiders. The study was conducted during 2009/2010, at the Experimental Research Station of Agriculture (EEA-INTA) Reconquista (Santa Fe, Argentina) where we considered four different designs: C1 (five agricultural fields), C2 (three agricultural fields and fourlivestock fields), C3 (six agricultural fields and one livestock field) and C4 (five agricultural fields and one forest area). In each design, the spiders were collected by pitfall traps and suction samples with a G-Vac (garden-vacuum). The designs proposed were considered on the basis of environmental heterogeneity. The C4 treatment had the greatest number of species, followed by C2, C3 and C1 (183, 178, 144 and 14 species, respectively), and C2 presented the greatest abundance of spiders followed by C4, C3 and C1 (n=5708, 4785, 4271 and 3448, respectively). Eight guilds were present in C3 and C4. This study is the first to evaluate the diversity of spiders in agropastoral systems in Argentina. Our results show that designs that include more fields with livestock orequal to those for agriculture, as well as forest areas, increase environmental heterogeneity. Therefore, the presence of a biological controller and dominant predatory group will be possible with sustainable designs that have environmental heterogeneity, contributing to improved pest control in agricultural systems.Fil: Almada, Melina Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gonzalez, Alda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; ArgentinaFil: Corronca, Jose Antonio. Universidad Nacional de Salta; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaSpanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology2017-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/64122Almada, Melina Soledad; Gonzalez, Alda; Corronca, Jose Antonio; Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders; Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology; Spanish Journal Of Agricultural Research; 15; 1; 3-2017; 1-101695-971XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5424/sjar/2017151-9712info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/9712info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:39:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/64122instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:39:29.043CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
title Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
spellingShingle Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
Almada, Melina Soledad
AGRO-ECOLOGICAL DESIGN
ARANEOFAUNA
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY
title_short Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
title_full Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
title_fullStr Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
title_sort Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Almada, Melina Soledad
Gonzalez, Alda
Corronca, Jose Antonio
author Almada, Melina Soledad
author_facet Almada, Melina Soledad
Gonzalez, Alda
Corronca, Jose Antonio
author_role author
author2 Gonzalez, Alda
Corronca, Jose Antonio
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv AGRO-ECOLOGICAL DESIGN
ARANEOFAUNA
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY
topic AGRO-ECOLOGICAL DESIGN
ARANEOFAUNA
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
ENVIRONMENTAL HETEROGENEITY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Sustainable agro-ecological design is challenging when the goal is self-regulation of the system. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the agropastoral design system affects the spider community, as spiders are the main predators in these production systems, and to determine those designs which maximize the diversity and density of spiders. The study was conducted during 2009/2010, at the Experimental Research Station of Agriculture (EEA-INTA) Reconquista (Santa Fe, Argentina) where we considered four different designs: C1 (five agricultural fields), C2 (three agricultural fields and fourlivestock fields), C3 (six agricultural fields and one livestock field) and C4 (five agricultural fields and one forest area). In each design, the spiders were collected by pitfall traps and suction samples with a G-Vac (garden-vacuum). The designs proposed were considered on the basis of environmental heterogeneity. The C4 treatment had the greatest number of species, followed by C2, C3 and C1 (183, 178, 144 and 14 species, respectively), and C2 presented the greatest abundance of spiders followed by C4, C3 and C1 (n=5708, 4785, 4271 and 3448, respectively). Eight guilds were present in C3 and C4. This study is the first to evaluate the diversity of spiders in agropastoral systems in Argentina. Our results show that designs that include more fields with livestock orequal to those for agriculture, as well as forest areas, increase environmental heterogeneity. Therefore, the presence of a biological controller and dominant predatory group will be possible with sustainable designs that have environmental heterogeneity, contributing to improved pest control in agricultural systems.
Fil: Almada, Melina Soledad. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gonzalez, Alda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Corronca, Jose Antonio. Universidad Nacional de Salta; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Sustainable agro-ecological design is challenging when the goal is self-regulation of the system. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the agropastoral design system affects the spider community, as spiders are the main predators in these production systems, and to determine those designs which maximize the diversity and density of spiders. The study was conducted during 2009/2010, at the Experimental Research Station of Agriculture (EEA-INTA) Reconquista (Santa Fe, Argentina) where we considered four different designs: C1 (five agricultural fields), C2 (three agricultural fields and fourlivestock fields), C3 (six agricultural fields and one livestock field) and C4 (five agricultural fields and one forest area). In each design, the spiders were collected by pitfall traps and suction samples with a G-Vac (garden-vacuum). The designs proposed were considered on the basis of environmental heterogeneity. The C4 treatment had the greatest number of species, followed by C2, C3 and C1 (183, 178, 144 and 14 species, respectively), and C2 presented the greatest abundance of spiders followed by C4, C3 and C1 (n=5708, 4785, 4271 and 3448, respectively). Eight guilds were present in C3 and C4. This study is the first to evaluate the diversity of spiders in agropastoral systems in Argentina. Our results show that designs that include more fields with livestock orequal to those for agriculture, as well as forest areas, increase environmental heterogeneity. Therefore, the presence of a biological controller and dominant predatory group will be possible with sustainable designs that have environmental heterogeneity, contributing to improved pest control in agricultural systems.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/64122
Almada, Melina Soledad; Gonzalez, Alda; Corronca, Jose Antonio; Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders; Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology; Spanish Journal Of Agricultural Research; 15; 1; 3-2017; 1-10
1695-971X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/64122
identifier_str_mv Almada, Melina Soledad; Gonzalez, Alda; Corronca, Jose Antonio; Evaluation of the design effects of different agropastoral systems on the diversity and density of spiders; Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology; Spanish Journal Of Agricultural Research; 15; 1; 3-2017; 1-10
1695-971X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5424/sjar/2017151-9712
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/9712
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Spanish National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782058945314816
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares