Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands

Autores
Gaitan, Juan J.; Oliva, Gabriel Esteban; Bran, Donaldo E.; Maestre, Fernando T.; Aguiar, Martin Roberto; Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel; Buono, Gustavo G.; Ferrante, Daniela; Nakamatsu, Viviana B.; Ciari, Georgina; Salomone, Jorge M.; Massara, Virginia
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Drylands cover about 41% of Earth's land surface, and 65% of their area supports domestic livestock that depends on the above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) of natural vegetation. Thus, understanding how biotic and abiotic factors control ANPP and related ecosystem functions can largely help to create more sustainable land-use practices in rangelands, particularly in the context of ongoing global environmental change. We used 311 sites across a broad natural gradient in Patagonian rangelands to evaluate the relative importance of climate (temperature and precipitation) and vegetation structure (grass and shrub cover, species richness) as drivers of ANPP, precipitation-use efficiency (PUE) and precipitation marginal response (PMR). Climatic variables explained 60%, 52% and 12% of the variation in grass cover, shrub cover and species richness, respectively. Shrub cover increased in areas with warmer, drier and winter rainfall climates, while the response observed for both grass cover and species richness was the opposite. Climate and vegetation structure explained 70%, 60% and 29% of the variation in ANPP, PUE and PMR, respectively. These three variables increased with increasing vegetation cover, particularly grass cover. Species richness also increased with ANPP, PUE and PMR. ANPP increased, and PUE decreased with increasing mean annual precipitation, whereas PMR increased with the proportion of precipitation falling in spring–summer. Temperature had a strong negative effect on ANPP and PUE, and a positive direct effect on PMR. Standardized total effects from structural equation modelling showed that vegetation structure and climate had similar strengths as drivers of ecosystem functioning. Grass cover had the highest total effect on ANPP (0.58), PUE (0.55) and PMR (0.41). Among the climatic variables, mean annual precipitation had the strongest total effect on ANPP (0.51) and PUE (−0.41), and the proportion of the precipitation falling in spring–summer was the most influential on PMR (0.36). Synthesis. Vegetation structure is as important as climate in shaping ecosystem functioning Patagonian rangelands. Maintaining and enhancing vegetation cover and species richness, particularly in grasses, could reduce the adverse effects of climate change on ecosystem functioning in these ecosystems.
Fil: Gaitan, Juan J.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Oliva, Gabriel Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Bran, Donaldo E.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Maestre, Fernando T.. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnolog ía. Area de Biodiversidad y Conservación. Departamento de Biolog ía y Geolog ía; España
Fil: Aguiar, Martin Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis; Argentina
Fil: Buono, Gustavo G.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
Fil: Ferrante, Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Nakamatsu, Viviana B.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
Fil: Ciari, Georgina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental Agroforestal Esquel; Argentina
Fil: Salomone, Jorge M.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
Fil: Massara, Virginia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
Materia
Patagonian Steppe
Biogeografia
Estructura de La Vegetacion
Clima
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4253
Acceder
id CONICETDig_2eb422c7eab670303156c9d84e89ccaf
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4253
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelandsGaitan, Juan J.Oliva, Gabriel EstebanBran, Donaldo E.Maestre, Fernando T.Aguiar, Martin RobertoJobbagy Gampel, Esteban GabrielBuono, Gustavo G.Ferrante, DanielaNakamatsu, Viviana B.Ciari, GeorginaSalomone, Jorge M.Massara, VirginiaPatagonian SteppeBiogeografiaEstructura de La VegetacionClimahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Drylands cover about 41% of Earth's land surface, and 65% of their area supports domestic livestock that depends on the above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) of natural vegetation. Thus, understanding how biotic and abiotic factors control ANPP and related ecosystem functions can largely help to create more sustainable land-use practices in rangelands, particularly in the context of ongoing global environmental change. We used 311 sites across a broad natural gradient in Patagonian rangelands to evaluate the relative importance of climate (temperature and precipitation) and vegetation structure (grass and shrub cover, species richness) as drivers of ANPP, precipitation-use efficiency (PUE) and precipitation marginal response (PMR). Climatic variables explained 60%, 52% and 12% of the variation in grass cover, shrub cover and species richness, respectively. Shrub cover increased in areas with warmer, drier and winter rainfall climates, while the response observed for both grass cover and species richness was the opposite. Climate and vegetation structure explained 70%, 60% and 29% of the variation in ANPP, PUE and PMR, respectively. These three variables increased with increasing vegetation cover, particularly grass cover. Species richness also increased with ANPP, PUE and PMR. ANPP increased, and PUE decreased with increasing mean annual precipitation, whereas PMR increased with the proportion of precipitation falling in spring–summer. Temperature had a strong negative effect on ANPP and PUE, and a positive direct effect on PMR. Standardized total effects from structural equation modelling showed that vegetation structure and climate had similar strengths as drivers of ecosystem functioning. Grass cover had the highest total effect on ANPP (0.58), PUE (0.55) and PMR (0.41). Among the climatic variables, mean annual precipitation had the strongest total effect on ANPP (0.51) and PUE (−0.41), and the proportion of the precipitation falling in spring–summer was the most influential on PMR (0.36). Synthesis. Vegetation structure is as important as climate in shaping ecosystem functioning Patagonian rangelands. Maintaining and enhancing vegetation cover and species richness, particularly in grasses, could reduce the adverse effects of climate change on ecosystem functioning in these ecosystems.Fil: Gaitan, Juan J.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Oliva, Gabriel Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Bran, Donaldo E.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Maestre, Fernando T.. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnolog ía. Area de Biodiversidad y Conservación. Departamento de Biolog ía y Geolog ía; EspañaFil: Aguiar, Martin Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaFil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis; ArgentinaFil: Buono, Gustavo G.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; ArgentinaFil: Ferrante, Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Nakamatsu, Viviana B.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; ArgentinaFil: Ciari, Georgina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental Agroforestal Esquel; ArgentinaFil: Salomone, Jorge M.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; ArgentinaFil: Massara, Virginia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; ArgentinaWiley2014-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/4253Gaitan, Juan J.; Oliva, Gabriel Esteban; Bran, Donaldo E.; Maestre, Fernando T.; Aguiar, Martin Roberto; et al.; Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands; Wiley; Journal of Ecology; 102; 6; 11-2014; 1419-14280022-0477enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12273/abstractinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0022-0477info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.12273info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:05:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/4253instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:05:48.641CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
title Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
spellingShingle Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
Gaitan, Juan J.
Patagonian Steppe
Biogeografia
Estructura de La Vegetacion
Clima
title_short Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
title_full Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
title_fullStr Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
title_full_unstemmed Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
title_sort Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gaitan, Juan J.
Oliva, Gabriel Esteban
Bran, Donaldo E.
Maestre, Fernando T.
Aguiar, Martin Roberto
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Buono, Gustavo G.
Ferrante, Daniela
Nakamatsu, Viviana B.
Ciari, Georgina
Salomone, Jorge M.
Massara, Virginia
author Gaitan, Juan J.
author_facet Gaitan, Juan J.
Oliva, Gabriel Esteban
Bran, Donaldo E.
Maestre, Fernando T.
Aguiar, Martin Roberto
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Buono, Gustavo G.
Ferrante, Daniela
Nakamatsu, Viviana B.
Ciari, Georgina
Salomone, Jorge M.
Massara, Virginia
author_role author
author2 Oliva, Gabriel Esteban
Bran, Donaldo E.
Maestre, Fernando T.
Aguiar, Martin Roberto
Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel
Buono, Gustavo G.
Ferrante, Daniela
Nakamatsu, Viviana B.
Ciari, Georgina
Salomone, Jorge M.
Massara, Virginia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Patagonian Steppe
Biogeografia
Estructura de La Vegetacion
Clima
topic Patagonian Steppe
Biogeografia
Estructura de La Vegetacion
Clima
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Drylands cover about 41% of Earth's land surface, and 65% of their area supports domestic livestock that depends on the above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) of natural vegetation. Thus, understanding how biotic and abiotic factors control ANPP and related ecosystem functions can largely help to create more sustainable land-use practices in rangelands, particularly in the context of ongoing global environmental change. We used 311 sites across a broad natural gradient in Patagonian rangelands to evaluate the relative importance of climate (temperature and precipitation) and vegetation structure (grass and shrub cover, species richness) as drivers of ANPP, precipitation-use efficiency (PUE) and precipitation marginal response (PMR). Climatic variables explained 60%, 52% and 12% of the variation in grass cover, shrub cover and species richness, respectively. Shrub cover increased in areas with warmer, drier and winter rainfall climates, while the response observed for both grass cover and species richness was the opposite. Climate and vegetation structure explained 70%, 60% and 29% of the variation in ANPP, PUE and PMR, respectively. These three variables increased with increasing vegetation cover, particularly grass cover. Species richness also increased with ANPP, PUE and PMR. ANPP increased, and PUE decreased with increasing mean annual precipitation, whereas PMR increased with the proportion of precipitation falling in spring–summer. Temperature had a strong negative effect on ANPP and PUE, and a positive direct effect on PMR. Standardized total effects from structural equation modelling showed that vegetation structure and climate had similar strengths as drivers of ecosystem functioning. Grass cover had the highest total effect on ANPP (0.58), PUE (0.55) and PMR (0.41). Among the climatic variables, mean annual precipitation had the strongest total effect on ANPP (0.51) and PUE (−0.41), and the proportion of the precipitation falling in spring–summer was the most influential on PMR (0.36). Synthesis. Vegetation structure is as important as climate in shaping ecosystem functioning Patagonian rangelands. Maintaining and enhancing vegetation cover and species richness, particularly in grasses, could reduce the adverse effects of climate change on ecosystem functioning in these ecosystems.
Fil: Gaitan, Juan J.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Oliva, Gabriel Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Bran, Donaldo E.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Norte. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria San Carlos de Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Maestre, Fernando T.. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnolog ía. Area de Biodiversidad y Conservación. Departamento de Biolog ía y Geolog ía; España
Fil: Aguiar, Martin Roberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Fil: Jobbagy Gampel, Esteban Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico San Luis. Instituto de Matemática Aplicada de San Luis; Argentina
Fil: Buono, Gustavo G.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
Fil: Ferrante, Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Nakamatsu, Viviana B.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
Fil: Ciari, Georgina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agropecuaria. Estación Experimental Agroforestal Esquel; Argentina
Fil: Salomone, Jorge M.. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
Fil: Massara, Virginia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Centro Regional Patagonia Sur. Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Chubut; Argentina
description Drylands cover about 41% of Earth's land surface, and 65% of their area supports domestic livestock that depends on the above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) of natural vegetation. Thus, understanding how biotic and abiotic factors control ANPP and related ecosystem functions can largely help to create more sustainable land-use practices in rangelands, particularly in the context of ongoing global environmental change. We used 311 sites across a broad natural gradient in Patagonian rangelands to evaluate the relative importance of climate (temperature and precipitation) and vegetation structure (grass and shrub cover, species richness) as drivers of ANPP, precipitation-use efficiency (PUE) and precipitation marginal response (PMR). Climatic variables explained 60%, 52% and 12% of the variation in grass cover, shrub cover and species richness, respectively. Shrub cover increased in areas with warmer, drier and winter rainfall climates, while the response observed for both grass cover and species richness was the opposite. Climate and vegetation structure explained 70%, 60% and 29% of the variation in ANPP, PUE and PMR, respectively. These three variables increased with increasing vegetation cover, particularly grass cover. Species richness also increased with ANPP, PUE and PMR. ANPP increased, and PUE decreased with increasing mean annual precipitation, whereas PMR increased with the proportion of precipitation falling in spring–summer. Temperature had a strong negative effect on ANPP and PUE, and a positive direct effect on PMR. Standardized total effects from structural equation modelling showed that vegetation structure and climate had similar strengths as drivers of ecosystem functioning. Grass cover had the highest total effect on ANPP (0.58), PUE (0.55) and PMR (0.41). Among the climatic variables, mean annual precipitation had the strongest total effect on ANPP (0.51) and PUE (−0.41), and the proportion of the precipitation falling in spring–summer was the most influential on PMR (0.36). Synthesis. Vegetation structure is as important as climate in shaping ecosystem functioning Patagonian rangelands. Maintaining and enhancing vegetation cover and species richness, particularly in grasses, could reduce the adverse effects of climate change on ecosystem functioning in these ecosystems.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4253
Gaitan, Juan J.; Oliva, Gabriel Esteban; Bran, Donaldo E.; Maestre, Fernando T.; Aguiar, Martin Roberto; et al.; Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands; Wiley; Journal of Ecology; 102; 6; 11-2014; 1419-1428
0022-0477
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/4253
identifier_str_mv Gaitan, Juan J.; Oliva, Gabriel Esteban; Bran, Donaldo E.; Maestre, Fernando T.; Aguiar, Martin Roberto; et al.; Vegetation structure is as important as climate to explain ecosystem functioning across Patagonian rangelands; Wiley; Journal of Ecology; 102; 6; 11-2014; 1419-1428
0022-0477
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2745.12273/abstract
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0022-0477
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/DOI:10.1111/1365-2745.12273
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781344833601536
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares