Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes

Autores
Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; Potts, Matthew D.
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits.
Fil: Butsic, Van. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. Berkeley University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Pallud, Leo. ENSTA ParisTech; Francia
Fil: Helmstedt, Kate J.. Queensland University of Technology; Australia
Fil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Potts, Matthew D.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos
Materia
CONSERVATION
LAND SHARING
LAND SPARING
OPTIMIZATION
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY
TRADE-OFFS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148407

id CONICETDig_2d0432425655a8209d14b0f9604bff2f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148407
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapesButsic, VanKuemmerle, TobiasPallud, LeoHelmstedt, Kate J.Macchi, LeandroPotts, Matthew D.CONSERVATIONLAND SHARINGLAND SPARINGOPTIMIZATIONSPATIAL HETEROGENEITYTRADE-OFFShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits.Fil: Butsic, Van. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. Berkeley University; Estados UnidosFil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Pallud, Leo. ENSTA ParisTech; FranciaFil: Helmstedt, Kate J.. Queensland University of Technology; AustraliaFil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Potts, Matthew D.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados UnidosEcological Society of America2020-04-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/148407Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; et al.; Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 30; 3; 14-4-2020; 1-321051-0761CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/eap.2057info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2057info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:32:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148407instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:32:41.567CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
title Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
spellingShingle Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
Butsic, Van
CONSERVATION
LAND SHARING
LAND SPARING
OPTIMIZATION
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY
TRADE-OFFS
title_short Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
title_full Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
title_fullStr Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
title_full_unstemmed Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
title_sort Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Butsic, Van
Kuemmerle, Tobias
Pallud, Leo
Helmstedt, Kate J.
Macchi, Leandro
Potts, Matthew D.
author Butsic, Van
author_facet Butsic, Van
Kuemmerle, Tobias
Pallud, Leo
Helmstedt, Kate J.
Macchi, Leandro
Potts, Matthew D.
author_role author
author2 Kuemmerle, Tobias
Pallud, Leo
Helmstedt, Kate J.
Macchi, Leandro
Potts, Matthew D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CONSERVATION
LAND SHARING
LAND SPARING
OPTIMIZATION
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY
TRADE-OFFS
topic CONSERVATION
LAND SHARING
LAND SPARING
OPTIMIZATION
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY
TRADE-OFFS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits.
Fil: Butsic, Van. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. Berkeley University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Pallud, Leo. ENSTA ParisTech; Francia
Fil: Helmstedt, Kate J.. Queensland University of Technology; Australia
Fil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Potts, Matthew D.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos
description Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/148407
Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; et al.; Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 30; 3; 14-4-2020; 1-32
1051-0761
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/148407
identifier_str_mv Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; et al.; Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 30; 3; 14-4-2020; 1-32
1051-0761
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/eap.2057
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2057
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Society of America
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Society of America
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614340863328256
score 13.070432