Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes
- Autores
- Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; Potts, Matthew D.
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits.
Fil: Butsic, Van. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. Berkeley University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Pallud, Leo. ENSTA ParisTech; Francia
Fil: Helmstedt, Kate J.. Queensland University of Technology; Australia
Fil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania
Fil: Potts, Matthew D.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
CONSERVATION
LAND SHARING
LAND SPARING
OPTIMIZATION
SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY
TRADE-OFFS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148407
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_2d0432425655a8209d14b0f9604bff2f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148407 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapesButsic, VanKuemmerle, TobiasPallud, LeoHelmstedt, Kate J.Macchi, LeandroPotts, Matthew D.CONSERVATIONLAND SHARINGLAND SPARINGOPTIMIZATIONSPATIAL HETEROGENEITYTRADE-OFFShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits.Fil: Butsic, Van. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. Berkeley University; Estados UnidosFil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Pallud, Leo. ENSTA ParisTech; FranciaFil: Helmstedt, Kate J.. Queensland University of Technology; AustraliaFil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universität zu Berlin; AlemaniaFil: Potts, Matthew D.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados UnidosEcological Society of America2020-04-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/148407Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; et al.; Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 30; 3; 14-4-2020; 1-321051-0761CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/eap.2057info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2057info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:32:41Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/148407instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:32:41.567CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes |
title |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes |
spellingShingle |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes Butsic, Van CONSERVATION LAND SHARING LAND SPARING OPTIMIZATION SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY TRADE-OFFS |
title_short |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes |
title_full |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes |
title_fullStr |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes |
title_sort |
Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Butsic, Van Kuemmerle, Tobias Pallud, Leo Helmstedt, Kate J. Macchi, Leandro Potts, Matthew D. |
author |
Butsic, Van |
author_facet |
Butsic, Van Kuemmerle, Tobias Pallud, Leo Helmstedt, Kate J. Macchi, Leandro Potts, Matthew D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kuemmerle, Tobias Pallud, Leo Helmstedt, Kate J. Macchi, Leandro Potts, Matthew D. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CONSERVATION LAND SHARING LAND SPARING OPTIMIZATION SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY TRADE-OFFS |
topic |
CONSERVATION LAND SHARING LAND SPARING OPTIMIZATION SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY TRADE-OFFS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits. Fil: Butsic, Van. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos. Berkeley University; Estados Unidos Fil: Kuemmerle, Tobias. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania Fil: Pallud, Leo. ENSTA ParisTech; Francia Fil: Helmstedt, Kate J.. Queensland University of Technology; Australia Fil: Macchi, Leandro. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto de Ecología Regional; Argentina. Universität zu Berlin; Alemania Fil: Potts, Matthew D.. University of California at Berkeley; Estados Unidos |
description |
Understanding the trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and agricultural production has become a fundamental question in sustainability science. Substantial research has focused on how species’ populations respond to agricultural intensification, with the goal to understand whether conservation policies that spatially separate agriculture and conservation or, alternatively, integrate the two are more beneficial. Spatial heterogeneity in both species abundance and agricultural productivity have been largely left out of this discussion, although these patterns are ubiquitous from local to global scales due to varying land capacity. Here, we address the question of how to align agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in heterogeneous landscapes. Using model simulations of species abundance and agricultural yields, we show that trade-offs between agricultural production and species’ abundance can be reduced by minimizing the cost (in terms of species abundance) of agricultural production. We find that when species’ abundance and agricultural yields vary across landscapes, the optimal strategy to minimize trade-offs is rarely pure land sparing or land sharing. Instead, landscapes that combine elements of both strategies are optimal. Additionally, we show how the reference population of a species is defined has important influences on optimization results. Our findings suggest that in the real world, understanding the impact of heterogeneous land capacity on biodiversity and agricultural production is crucial to designing multi-use landscapes that jointly maximize conservation and agricultural benefits. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-14 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/148407 Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; et al.; Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 30; 3; 14-4-2020; 1-32 1051-0761 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/148407 |
identifier_str_mv |
Butsic, Van; Kuemmerle, Tobias; Pallud, Leo; Helmstedt, Kate J.; Macchi, Leandro; et al.; Aligning biodiversity conservation and agricultural production in heterogeneous landscapes; Ecological Society of America; Ecological Applications; 30; 3; 14-4-2020; 1-32 1051-0761 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/eap.2057 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2057 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological Society of America |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological Society of America |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614340863328256 |
score |
13.070432 |