The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity

Autores
Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael
Año de publicación
2007
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).
Fil: Lanata, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentina
Fil: Aldenderfer, Mark. No especifica;
Fil: Jochim, Michael. No especifica;
Materia
Proceso de revisión
Quality
Publication
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83307

id CONICETDig_2d0052d1e72da0f7be9134dcf7f5ca3b
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83307
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American AntiquityLanata, Jose LuisAldenderfer, MarkJochim, MichaelProceso de revisiónQualityPublicationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).Fil: Lanata, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; ArgentinaFil: Aldenderfer, Mark. No especifica;Fil: Jochim, Michael. No especifica;Society for American Archaeology2007-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/83307Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael; The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity; Society for American Archaeology; SAA Archaeological Record; 7; 1; 12-2007; 12-151532-7299CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.saa.org/publications/the-saa-archaeological-recordinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-publications/publications/the-saa-archaeological-record/tsar-2007/jan07.pdf?sfvrsn=8ad26869_2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/156205info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:30:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83307instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:30:22.767CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
title The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
spellingShingle The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
Lanata, Jose Luis
Proceso de revisión
Quality
Publication
title_short The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
title_full The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
title_fullStr The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
title_full_unstemmed The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
title_sort The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lanata, Jose Luis
Aldenderfer, Mark
Jochim, Michael
author Lanata, Jose Luis
author_facet Lanata, Jose Luis
Aldenderfer, Mark
Jochim, Michael
author_role author
author2 Aldenderfer, Mark
Jochim, Michael
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Proceso de revisión
Quality
Publication
topic Proceso de revisión
Quality
Publication
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).
Fil: Lanata, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentina
Fil: Aldenderfer, Mark. No especifica;
Fil: Jochim, Michael. No especifica;
description Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).
publishDate 2007
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2007-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83307
Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael; The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity; Society for American Archaeology; SAA Archaeological Record; 7; 1; 12-2007; 12-15
1532-7299
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83307
identifier_str_mv Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael; The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity; Society for American Archaeology; SAA Archaeological Record; 7; 1; 12-2007; 12-15
1532-7299
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.saa.org/publications/the-saa-archaeological-record
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-publications/publications/the-saa-archaeological-record/tsar-2007/jan07.pdf?sfvrsn=8ad26869_2
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/156205
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Society for American Archaeology
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Society for American Archaeology
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614312181628928
score 13.070432