The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity
- Autores
- Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael
- Año de publicación
- 2007
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).
Fil: Lanata, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentina
Fil: Aldenderfer, Mark. No especifica;
Fil: Jochim, Michael. No especifica; - Materia
-
Proceso de revisión
Quality
Publication - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83307
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_2d0052d1e72da0f7be9134dcf7f5ca3b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83307 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American AntiquityLanata, Jose LuisAldenderfer, MarkJochim, MichaelProceso de revisiónQualityPublicationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).Fil: Lanata, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; ArgentinaFil: Aldenderfer, Mark. No especifica;Fil: Jochim, Michael. No especifica;Society for American Archaeology2007-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/83307Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael; The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity; Society for American Archaeology; SAA Archaeological Record; 7; 1; 12-2007; 12-151532-7299CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.saa.org/publications/the-saa-archaeological-recordinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-publications/publications/the-saa-archaeological-record/tsar-2007/jan07.pdf?sfvrsn=8ad26869_2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/156205info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:30:22Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/83307instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:30:22.767CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity |
title |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity |
spellingShingle |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity Lanata, Jose Luis Proceso de revisión Quality Publication |
title_short |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity |
title_full |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity |
title_fullStr |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity |
title_full_unstemmed |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity |
title_sort |
The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lanata, Jose Luis Aldenderfer, Mark Jochim, Michael |
author |
Lanata, Jose Luis |
author_facet |
Lanata, Jose Luis Aldenderfer, Mark Jochim, Michael |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aldenderfer, Mark Jochim, Michael |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Proceso de revisión Quality Publication |
topic |
Proceso de revisión Quality Publication |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968). Fil: Lanata, Jose Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Diversidad Cultural y Procesos de Cambio; Argentina Fil: Aldenderfer, Mark. No especifica; Fil: Jochim, Michael. No especifica; |
description |
Far from being perfect, the peer-review process is nevertheless the most effective way to assure the quality of a publication. Because they have used peer review from their very beginnings, American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).American Antiquity (AAQ) and Latin American Antiquity (LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968).(LAQ) are journals of high academic impact with strong reputations in the world academic community. The peer-review process seeks not only to identify the highest-quality manuscripts, but also works to improve the clarity of presentation of any author. The process is based on four fundamental principles: the importance of the diffusion of knowledge, the assurance of the preservation of knowledge in different media, the maintenance of control over the quality of knowledge that is disseminated, and the proper crediting to investigators and their discoveries and scientific contributions. Taken together, these principles maintain the excellence of scientific knowledge in any field (Meadows 1974; Ravetz 1973; Ziman 1968). |
publishDate |
2007 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2007-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83307 Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael; The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity; Society for American Archaeology; SAA Archaeological Record; 7; 1; 12-2007; 12-15 1532-7299 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/83307 |
identifier_str_mv |
Lanata, Jose Luis; Aldenderfer, Mark; Jochim, Michael; The peer-Review process for Amercan Antiquity and Latin American Antiquity; Society for American Archaeology; SAA Archaeological Record; 7; 1; 12-2007; 12-15 1532-7299 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.saa.org/publications/the-saa-archaeological-record info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://documents.saa.org/container/docs/default-source/doc-publications/publications/the-saa-archaeological-record/tsar-2007/jan07.pdf?sfvrsn=8ad26869_2 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/156205 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Society for American Archaeology |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Society for American Archaeology |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614312181628928 |
score |
13.070432 |