What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?

Autores
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies.
Fil: Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
QUANTUM THEORIES
FORMULATIONS
MINIMAL INTERPRETATION
EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239110

id CONICETDig_26089f9b53b9ade238f14d4463fbff98
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239110
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.QUANTUM THEORIESFORMULATIONSMINIMAL INTERPRETATIONEMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies.Fil: Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaAcademiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"2023-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/239110Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.; What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?; Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie; 67; 2; 7-2023; 153-1791220-54002821-4242CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.institutuldefilosofie.ro/page.php?153info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239110instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:31.169CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
title What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
spellingShingle What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.
QUANTUM THEORIES
FORMULATIONS
MINIMAL INTERPRETATION
EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE
title_short What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
title_full What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
title_fullStr What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
title_full_unstemmed What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
title_sort What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.
author Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.
author_facet Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv QUANTUM THEORIES
FORMULATIONS
MINIMAL INTERPRETATION
EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE
topic QUANTUM THEORIES
FORMULATIONS
MINIMAL INTERPRETATION
EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies.
Fil: Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239110
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.; What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?; Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie; 67; 2; 7-2023; 153-179
1220-5400
2821-4242
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239110
identifier_str_mv Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.; What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?; Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie; 67; 2; 7-2023; 153-179
1220-5400
2821-4242
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.institutuldefilosofie.ro/page.php?153
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269230238531584
score 13.13397