What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?
- Autores
- Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies.
Fil: Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
QUANTUM THEORIES
FORMULATIONS
MINIMAL INTERPRETATION
EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239110
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_26089f9b53b9ade238f14d4463fbff98 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239110 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.QUANTUM THEORIESFORMULATIONSMINIMAL INTERPRETATIONEMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies.Fil: Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaAcademiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"2023-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/239110Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.; What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?; Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie; 67; 2; 7-2023; 153-1791220-54002821-4242CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.institutuldefilosofie.ro/page.php?153info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:53:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239110instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:53:31.169CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? |
title |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? |
spellingShingle |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F. QUANTUM THEORIES FORMULATIONS MINIMAL INTERPRETATION EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE |
title_short |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? |
title_full |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? |
title_fullStr |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? |
title_sort |
What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be? |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F. |
author |
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F. |
author_facet |
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F. |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
QUANTUM THEORIES FORMULATIONS MINIMAL INTERPRETATION EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE |
topic |
QUANTUM THEORIES FORMULATIONS MINIMAL INTERPRETATION EMPIRICAL EQUIVALENCE |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies. Fil: Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
description |
There are many so-called interpretations of quantum mechanics, but we presently do not have any clear-cut criteria to identify them. Usually, scientists do not distinguish the different interpretations of the standard quantum theory from its alternative or rival theories, although there is an established fact that there exist different – even non-empirically equivalent – quantum theories. In this article, I put forward some criteria to distinguish between formulations, interpretations, and alternatives to a given quantum theory. I then show that we have just some partial criteria to identify quantum theories and distinguish them from interpretations. According to such criteria, all interpretations of a given quantum theory must be empirically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are rival theories, and must not be logically equivalent to it, otherwise, they are different formulations of such theory. I conclude that interpreting a quantum theory cannot consist in providing a unique ontology for that theory because the same theory is compatible with many different ontologies. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239110 Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.; What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?; Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie; 67; 2; 7-2023; 153-179 1220-5400 2821-4242 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239110 |
identifier_str_mv |
Cassini, Alejandro Pablo F.; What an interpretation of quantum mechanics should be?; Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru"; Revue Roumaine de Philosophie; 67; 2; 7-2023; 153-179 1220-5400 2821-4242 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.institutuldefilosofie.ro/page.php?153 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru" |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academiei Romane. Institutului de Filosofie si Psihologie "Constantin Radulescu-Motru" |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269230238531584 |
score |
13.13397 |