The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant
- Autores
- Marey, Macarena
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In this paper, I examine Kant's reception of and solution to the problem of the unity of the political will. I propose that Kant distances himself from the modern paradigmatic foundations of sovereignty principally with his theses of the ideality of the general will (section II) and of the apriority of the justification of popular sovereignty (section III). My interpretative hypothesis is that Kant solves the problem by grounding sovereignty in a conceptual element which is new in the history of political philosophy, i. e. the a priori unified omnilateral will. In section IV, I explain why my reading of the ideality of the general will can respond to seemingly plausible objections arising from Kant's own texts and how it works in the face of concrete political states of affairs.
Fil: Marey, Macarena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
GENERAL WILL
POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY
OMNILATERAL WILL
LEGITIMACY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/176967
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_2066996b44e4bb689c8a7bf15d359f8a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/176967 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kantMarey, MacarenaGENERAL WILLPOPULAR SOVEREIGNTYOMNILATERAL WILLLEGITIMACYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this paper, I examine Kant's reception of and solution to the problem of the unity of the political will. I propose that Kant distances himself from the modern paradigmatic foundations of sovereignty principally with his theses of the ideality of the general will (section II) and of the apriority of the justification of popular sovereignty (section III). My interpretative hypothesis is that Kant solves the problem by grounding sovereignty in a conceptual element which is new in the history of political philosophy, i. e. the a priori unified omnilateral will. In section IV, I explain why my reading of the ideality of the general will can respond to seemingly plausible objections arising from Kant's own texts and how it works in the face of concrete political states of affairs.Fil: Marey, Macarena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaDe Gruyter2018-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/176967Marey, Macarena; The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant; De Gruyter; Kant-Studien; 109; 4; 6-2018; 557-5800022-8877CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/kant.2018.109.issue-4/kant-2018-4001/kant-2018-4001.xmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/kant-2018-4001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:47:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/176967instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:47:59.062CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant |
title |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant |
spellingShingle |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant Marey, Macarena GENERAL WILL POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY OMNILATERAL WILL LEGITIMACY |
title_short |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant |
title_full |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant |
title_fullStr |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant |
title_full_unstemmed |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant |
title_sort |
The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Marey, Macarena |
author |
Marey, Macarena |
author_facet |
Marey, Macarena |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
GENERAL WILL POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY OMNILATERAL WILL LEGITIMACY |
topic |
GENERAL WILL POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY OMNILATERAL WILL LEGITIMACY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In this paper, I examine Kant's reception of and solution to the problem of the unity of the political will. I propose that Kant distances himself from the modern paradigmatic foundations of sovereignty principally with his theses of the ideality of the general will (section II) and of the apriority of the justification of popular sovereignty (section III). My interpretative hypothesis is that Kant solves the problem by grounding sovereignty in a conceptual element which is new in the history of political philosophy, i. e. the a priori unified omnilateral will. In section IV, I explain why my reading of the ideality of the general will can respond to seemingly plausible objections arising from Kant's own texts and how it works in the face of concrete political states of affairs. Fil: Marey, Macarena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
In this paper, I examine Kant's reception of and solution to the problem of the unity of the political will. I propose that Kant distances himself from the modern paradigmatic foundations of sovereignty principally with his theses of the ideality of the general will (section II) and of the apriority of the justification of popular sovereignty (section III). My interpretative hypothesis is that Kant solves the problem by grounding sovereignty in a conceptual element which is new in the history of political philosophy, i. e. the a priori unified omnilateral will. In section IV, I explain why my reading of the ideality of the general will can respond to seemingly plausible objections arising from Kant's own texts and how it works in the face of concrete political states of affairs. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/176967 Marey, Macarena; The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant; De Gruyter; Kant-Studien; 109; 4; 6-2018; 557-580 0022-8877 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/176967 |
identifier_str_mv |
Marey, Macarena; The ideal character of the general will and popular sovereignty in kant; De Gruyter; Kant-Studien; 109; 4; 6-2018; 557-580 0022-8877 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/kant.2018.109.issue-4/kant-2018-4001/kant-2018-4001.xml info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1515/kant-2018-4001 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
De Gruyter |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
De Gruyter |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268894763417600 |
score |
13.13397 |